I think the question is why there isn't a helper like BeanValidation.isBeanValidation() specified ? Implementation could be somewhat similar to what MyFaces does today. But I wonder why this wasn't done...
-M On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > in order to work on Trinidad 2.0 and 303 support (yeah need to check > what Gerhard did for extVal) I > took a quick look at the UIInput. > > I noticed a few lines containing a call like this: > > => BeanValidator.isAvailable > > This is a public field which is only there in MyFaces, not in the JSF > 2.0 API ([1]). > > I know that the entire handling of checking if there is a JSR 303 > implementation is > a little bit ugly, but I am not sure if we should introduce such a > "public" field to the > BeanValidator validator class. > > => wouldn't be good if extensions would start to rely on this field; I > guess not there on the RI ;-) > => does this violate the TCK ? Or would it be ? I am not sure here > two, as it is a public field > > Maybe we should make the make the check become a private thing ? > > -Matthias > > > [1] http://java.sun.com/javaee/javaserverfaces/2.0/docs/api/index.html > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
