yes, I can share my current setting.

I now fixed most occurrences, but there are a few classes which have 400++ LOC 
in one method, and I think this should get handled by someone which is more 
into myfaces-core than I am.

I will attach my current config to the wiki.

LieGrue,
strub



----- Original Message -----
> From: Michael Kurz <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: 
> Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2011 1:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] extend maximum allowed line length from 120 to 160
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> I can help you on this one - but probably not before Monday or Tuesday.
> 
> Btw.: Do you already have a settings file for IntelliJ 10.5?
> 
> regards
> Michael
> 
> 
> Am 28.10.2011 20:49, schrieb Mark Struberg:
>>  As I said earlier, the 160 char/line proposal was just made because I'm 
> pretty tired of fixing the checkstyle issues in myfaces-core already.
>> 
>> 
>>  If anyone is up for taking that piece of cake, then I'd be happy. 
> Otherwise I will do it over the weekend.
>> 
>>  LieGrue,
>>  strub
>> 
>>>  ________________________________
>>>  From: Blake Sullivan<[email protected]>
>>>  To: MyFaces Development<[email protected]>
>>>  Cc: Gerhard Petracek<[email protected]>
>>>  Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 8:13 PM
>>>  Subject: Re: [VOTE] extend maximum allowed line length from 120 to 160
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  I personally find 120 characters to be the best balance.  On the bright 
> side, I expect that once we can use the diamond operator in JDK 7, the 
> pressure 
> for longer lines will decrease.
>>> 
>>>  -- Blake Sullivan
>>> 
>>>  On 10/28/11 10:33 AM, Gerhard Petracek wrote:
>>>  @80: -1!
>>>>  @rest: +0
>>>> 
>>>>  regards,
>>>>  gerhard
>>>> 
>>>>  http://www.irian.at
>>>> 
>>>>  Your JSF powerhouse -
>>>>  JSF Consulting, Development and
>>>>  Courses in English and German
>>>> 
>>>>  Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>  2011/10/28 Volker Weber<[email protected]>
>>>> 
>>>>  Hi Mark,
>>>>> 
>>>>>  2011/10/28 Mark Struberg<[email protected]>:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>  Volker, source code is no newspaper.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>  just wanted to support the statement of easier reading in smaller
>>>>>  columns, of cause code is no newspaper, but it still need
>>               easy
>>>>>  reading.
>>>>> 
>>>>>  I don't like to scroll left and right to read the code, and
>>               even at
>>>>>  work were i got the widest screen the 1920px did not suffice
>>               to see
>>>>>  more than 120 characters with the project and structure
>>               sidebars left
>>>>>  and right, which i would not like to miss.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>  Regards,
>>>>>      Volker
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  Imo 80 chars is definitely fine for C or perl with
>>                   cryptic syntax (programmed that myself for 20 years) but
>>                   it's not nice for languages where descriptive variable
>>                   and method names are 'socially accepted' ;)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  LieGrue,
>>>>>>  strub
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>  From: Volker Weber<[email protected]>
>>>>>>>  To: MyFaces Development<[email protected]>; 
> Mark Struberg<[email protected]>
>>>>>>>  Cc:
>>>>>>>  Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 9:22 AM
>>>>>>>  Subject: Re: [VOTE] extend maximum allowed line
>>                   length from 120 to 160
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  Hi,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  -1.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  In my opinion 160 characters is much to wide,
>>                   the current 120 is not
>>>>>>>  the preferred, but the allowed max width.
>>>>>>>  I vote for 80 characters as preferred max
>>                   width.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  In general reading is easier if the text is not
>>                   too wide, thats why
>>>>>>>  newspaper articles are layouted in columns.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  Regards,
>>>>>>>       Volker
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  2011/10/26 Mark Struberg<[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>    Hi!
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>    Currently we have really long and very
>>                   descriptive variable names in
>>>>>>>  MyFaces.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>    I personally like that, but due to that we
>>                   are really often exceeding the
>>>>>>>  120 character per line.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>    Thus my question: should we extend this
>>                   from 120 to 160 characters being
>>>>>>>  allowed per line?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>    [+1] yup make 160 the max default
>>>>>>>>    [0] don't care
>>>>>>>>    [-1] nope, let's stick with 120
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>    open for 72h ...
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>    Please make use of your vote, because I
>>                   will activate the checkstyle checks
>>>>>>>  soon ;)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>    here is my +1.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>    LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>    strub
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  --
>>>>>>>  inexso - information exchange solutions GmbH
>>>>>>>  Ofener Str. 30      | 26121 Oldenburg
>>>>>>>  Tel.: +49 441 219 730 56 |
>>>>>>>  FAX:  +49 441 219 730 66 | eMail: 
> [email protected]
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  Firmensitz: Oldenburg | Amtsgericht Oldenburg
>>                   HRB 205251
>>>>>>>  Geschäftsführer: Stefan Schulte, Michael
>>                   Terschüren
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>  --
>>>>>  inexso - information exchange solutions GmbH
>>>>>  Ofener Str. 30      | 26121 Oldenburg
>>>>>  Tel.: +49 441 219 730 56 |
>>>>>  FAX:  +49 441 219 730 66 | eMail: [email protected]
>>>>> 
>>>>>  Firmensitz: Oldenburg | Amtsgericht Oldenburg HRB 205251
>>>>>  Geschäftsführer: Stefan Schulte, Michael Terschüren
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>

Reply via email to