2012/11/16 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>:
> core/branches/2.2.x is the official JSF-2.2 branch, isn't?
>

Yes.

> trunk is still 2.1.x but 2.2 goes into that branch afaik.
>

Yes, in fact, I was thinking on make 2.2.x the new trunk. It is a good
time to do it.

regards,

Leonardo

> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Leonardo Uribe <[email protected]>
>> To: MyFaces Development <[email protected]>; Mark Struberg 
>> <[email protected]>
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 4:26 PM
>> Subject: Re: state of 2.2.x branch
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Mark, I have not been working in 2.2.x branch. Don't blame me! (don't
>> you get tired? because I am tired). Werner created the branch to work
>> on client-window javascript part. The environment he uses does not
>> require compile the java part, and at the end of the day he just
>> synchronize the changes with the code in the branch.
>>
>> I tried to compile it and it works, but I have not run the artifacts.
>>
>> The idea is work on that branch, but my strategy is do not put
>> incomplete code or not running code in the svn, and work creating
>> patches or creating branches and merging changes. Only complete
>> features.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Leonardo
>>
>> 2012/11/16 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>:
>>>  PS: again, this should not be a personal critic. Every one makes errors.
>> Only the ones who do not work at all don't make errors :)
>>>
>>>
>>>  It just makes it clear that all of us must contribute more, actively review
>> changes and help out!
>>>  And Leo, you must open your mind to ideas of other people to let this
>> happen without endless (not technically backed) discussions.
>>>
>>>  LieGrue,
>>>  strub
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  ----- Original Message -----
>>>>  From: Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
>>>>  To: My Faces Development <[email protected]>
>>>>  Cc:
>>>>  Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 9:32 AM
>>>>  Subject: state of 2.2.x branch
>>>>
>>>>  I tried to keep trunk and core/branches/2.2.x in sync. But this is
>> currently
>>>>  totally broken
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  A.) it doesn't compile
>>>>  B.) there are JavaScript compilation errors
>>>>  c.) it still states a mixture of 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT and description says
>> 2.1 in the
>>>>  poms
>>>>
>>>>  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/branches/2.2.x/pom.xml
>>>>
>>>>  Please tell me that I'm wrong and are looking at the wrong files.
>> Otherwise
>>>>  I gonna cry now.
>>>>
>>>>  I hope we didn't CI deploy that broken stuff already...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  LieGrue,
>>>>  strub
>>>>
>>

Reply via email to