> Yes, in fact, I was thinking on make 2.2.x the new trunk. It is a good > time to do it.
I've no strong feelings the one way or the other. We just need to discuss it upfront and then do the switch in a public way and make everyone aware of it (blog, tweets, etc). LieGrue, strub ----- Original Message ----- > From: Leonardo Uribe <[email protected]> > To: MyFaces Development <[email protected]>; Mark Struberg > <[email protected]> > Cc: > Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 5:09 PM > Subject: Re: state of 2.2.x branch > > 2012/11/16 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: >> core/branches/2.2.x is the official JSF-2.2 branch, isn't? >> > > Yes. > >> trunk is still 2.1.x but 2.2 goes into that branch afaik. >> > > Yes, in fact, I was thinking on make 2.2.x the new trunk. It is a good > time to do it. > > regards, > > Leonardo > >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: Leonardo Uribe <[email protected]> >>> To: MyFaces Development <[email protected]>; Mark Struberg > <[email protected]> >>> Cc: >>> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 4:26 PM >>> Subject: Re: state of 2.2.x branch >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> Mark, I have not been working in 2.2.x branch. Don't blame me! > (don't >>> you get tired? because I am tired). Werner created the branch to work >>> on client-window javascript part. The environment he uses does not >>> require compile the java part, and at the end of the day he just >>> synchronize the changes with the code in the branch. >>> >>> I tried to compile it and it works, but I have not run the artifacts. >>> >>> The idea is work on that branch, but my strategy is do not put >>> incomplete code or not running code in the svn, and work creating >>> patches or creating branches and merging changes. Only complete >>> features. >>> >>> regards, >>> >>> Leonardo >>> >>> 2012/11/16 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: >>>> PS: again, this should not be a personal critic. Every one makes > errors. >>> Only the ones who do not work at all don't make errors :) >>>> >>>> >>>> It just makes it clear that all of us must contribute more, > actively review >>> changes and help out! >>>> And Leo, you must open your mind to ideas of other people to let > this >>> happen without endless (not technically backed) discussions. >>>> >>>> LieGrue, >>>> strub >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> From: Mark Struberg <[email protected]> >>>>> To: My Faces Development <[email protected]> >>>>> Cc: >>>>> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 9:32 AM >>>>> Subject: state of 2.2.x branch >>>>> >>>>> I tried to keep trunk and core/branches/2.2.x in sync. But > this is >>> currently >>>>> totally broken >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> A.) it doesn't compile >>>>> B.) there are JavaScript compilation errors >>>>> c.) it still states a mixture of 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT and > description says >>> 2.1 in the >>>>> poms >>>>> >>>>> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/branches/2.2.x/pom.xml >>>>> >>>>> Please tell me that I'm wrong and are looking at the wrong > files. >>> Otherwise >>>>> I gonna cry now. >>>>> >>>>> I hope we didn't CI deploy that broken stuff already... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> LieGrue, >>>>> strub >>>>> >>> >
