[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-4309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16968611#comment-16968611
]
Bill Lucy commented on MYFACES-4309:
------------------------------------
I've done a PR at [https://github.com/apache/myfaces/pull/71] that in my
(limited so far) testing preserves the pre-4297 behavior for the correct app
configs and scopes. That is, FACELETS_BUFFER_SIZE doesn't need to be set.
These changes will be a lot less strict for creating sessions than the original
4297 fix, but I think the primary cases for 4297 should still be covered. What
do you think [~tandraschko] and [~ncister] ?
> Session is broken in some cases due to MYFACES-4297
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MYFACES-4309
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-4309
> Project: MyFaces Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.3.5
> Reporter: Bill Lucy
> Assignee: Bill Lucy
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The changes made for MYFACES-4297 introduced a problem: in some cases a
> session is not created early enough for a session cookie to be written out on
> a response before it is committed, due to the small default response buffer
> size. As mentioned in the comments for 4297, that behavior causes a problem
> for the ViewScope (and I expect the session as well.)
> As discussed, increasing the javax.faces.FACELETS_BUFFER_SIZE is a
> workaround, but that's not ideal for a few reasons:
> 1. apps using the default buffer size value will be broken by the new
> behavior when updating to 2.3.5
> 2. there doesn't appear to be a way to update the buffer size for JSPs
> We should consider revisiting the changes made in MYFACES-4297. Or, if
> nothing else, we might want to add some way to change the default buffer size
> on the JSP path.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)