So we just do 2.3-M1 - 1000 until we know what happens in Jakarta / JSF.next?
Am Mo., 16. Dez. 2019 um 15:32 Uhr schrieb Werner Punz < [email protected]>: > I think we should stick to the milestone naming convention. > Given that it is a work in progress. > > Cheers > > Werner > > > > Am 16.12.19 um 12:50 schrieb Thomas Andraschko: > > ok, guys - i committed the extension now into > > myfaces-core/extensions/quarkus. > > > > it would be great if we can agree on the version/naming. > > Thanks to Werner, i think "myfaces next" is the correct naming. > > But how should we name it? > > > > don't change the group/artifactId but change version to: 2.3-next-M1? > > if we have a final release under the same name, it would be: 2.3-next-1 > > > > WDYT? > > >
