2.3-next-m1... yeah why not?
We still can release stable versions once we think we should do it.
Am 16.12.19 um 15:48 schrieb Thomas Andraschko:
So we just do 2.3-M1 - 1000 until we know what happens in Jakarta /
JSF.next?
Am Mo., 16. Dez. 2019 um 15:32 Uhr schrieb Werner Punz
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:
I think we should stick to the milestone naming convention.
Given that it is a work in progress.
Cheers
Werner
Am 16.12.19 um 12:50 schrieb Thomas Andraschko:
> ok, guys - i committed the extension now into
> myfaces-core/extensions/quarkus.
>
> it would be great if we can agree on the version/naming.
> Thanks to Werner, i think "myfaces next" is the correct naming.
> But how should we name it?
>
> don't change the group/artifactId but change version to: 2.3-next-M1?
> if we have a final release under the same name, it would be:
2.3-next-1
>
> WDYT?
