All right!
Will prepare 2.3-next-M1 this week and start a release vote :)

Am Mo., 16. Dez. 2019 um 15:53 Uhr schrieb Werner Punz <
[email protected]>:

> 2.3-next-m1... yeah why not?
> We still can release stable versions once we think we should do it.
>
>
>
> Am 16.12.19 um 15:48 schrieb Thomas Andraschko:
> > So we just do 2.3-M1 - 1000 until we know what happens in Jakarta /
> > JSF.next?
> >
> > Am Mo., 16. Dez. 2019 um 15:32 Uhr schrieb Werner Punz
> > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:
> >
> >     I think we should stick to the milestone naming convention.
> >     Given that it is a work in progress.
> >
> >     Cheers
> >
> >     Werner
> >
> >
> >
> >     Am 16.12.19 um 12:50 schrieb Thomas Andraschko:
> >      > ok, guys - i committed the extension now into
> >      > myfaces-core/extensions/quarkus.
> >      >
> >      > it would be great if we can agree on the version/naming.
> >      > Thanks to Werner, i think "myfaces next" is the correct naming.
> >      > But how should we name it?
> >      >
> >      > don't change the group/artifactId but change version to:
> 2.3-next-M1?
> >      > if we have a final release under the same name, it would be:
> >     2.3-next-1
> >      >
> >      > WDYT?
> >
> >
>
>
>

Reply via email to