I strongly agree to track issues on github, the integration with
github issues and PRs is very good and there's a lot of people already
using it on other projects.


On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 5:34 AM, Fabio Utzig <ut...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
> I prefer as much information in a single place as possible, and GH as been 
> adding more and more "project management" features making it better suited as 
> a Jira alternative (and btw, we already made this move with MCUBoot!).
> Cheers,
> Fabio Utzig
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018, at 2:27 PM, Christopher Collins wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 12:26:17AM -0800, aditi hilbert wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Multiple people have suggested that issues be tracked on Github close
>> > to the code. The benefit is that contributors don’t have to switch
>> > between two systems to raise and clear issues.  Please let your
>> > thoughts known either way.
>> I agree with switching to github issues.
>> Jira seems more powerful and I do like it, but I find the extra
>> flexibility is outweighed by the difficulty of using two different
>> systems (github for PRs, Jira for issues).
>> Chris

Miguel Azevedo

Reply via email to