+1 I strongly agree to track issues on github, the integration with github issues and PRs is very good and there's a lot of people already using it on other projects. Thanks,
Miguel On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 5:34 AM, Fabio Utzig <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > I prefer as much information in a single place as possible, and GH as been > adding more and more "project management" features making it better suited as > a Jira alternative (and btw, we already made this move with MCUBoot!). > > Cheers, > Fabio Utzig > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018, at 2:27 PM, Christopher Collins wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 12:26:17AM -0800, aditi hilbert wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Multiple people have suggested that issues be tracked on Github close >> > to the code. The benefit is that contributors don’t have to switch >> > between two systems to raise and clear issues. Please let your >> > thoughts known either way. >> >> I agree with switching to github issues. >> >> Jira seems more powerful and I do like it, but I find the extra >> flexibility is outweighed by the difficulty of using two different >> systems (github for PRs, Jira for issues). >> >> Chris -- -- Miguel Azevedo
