Hi Michał,
Yes, that is what you should be seeing, because the message is being sent to
the GROUP; originator receives it as well.
If you change it to the destination / target address, you wouldn’t see Received.
To test this, you would require two devices.
Assuming Device A and B.
With all three flags disabled and unique address ( node_address in mesh_init.c
Line 28).
Device A ( button Pressed ) -> Device B should say in the Log Received. ( Model
callback method - mesh_init.c Line 78 )
Device B ( button Pressed ) -> Device A should say in the Log Received.
With all three flags enabled and unique node_address.
Device A ( button Pressed )-> Device B will not receive any message.
Device B ( button Pressed )-> Device A will not receive any message.
With only BLE_ROLE* flags disabled on Device B and all three flags disabled on
Device B, and unique node_address.
Device A ( button Pressed )-> Device B should say in the Log Received.
Device B ( button Pressed )-> Device A will not receive any message.
Thanks,
Aditya Xavier.
> On 18-May-2018, at 3:23 PM, Michał Narajowski <michal.narajow...@codecoup.pl>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Aditya,
>
> I enabled these flags:
>
> BLE_ROLE_BROADCASTER: 1
> BLE_ROLE_PERIPHERAL: 1
> BLE_EXT_ADV: 1
>
> And this is what i see after pushing the button a few times:
>
> 045120 #mesh-onoff STATUS
> 045121 #mesh-onoff STATUS: Sent !
> 045123 Received
> 045263 #mesh-onoff STATUS
> 045264 #mesh-onoff STATUS: Sent !
> 045266 Received
> 045402 #mesh-onoff STATUS
> 045402 #mesh-onoff STATUS: Sent !
> 045404 Received
> 045535 #mesh-onoff STATUS
> 045536 #mesh-onoff STATUS: Sent !
> 045538 Received
> 046559 #mesh-onoff STATUS
> 046559 #mesh-onoff STATUS: Sent !
> 046561 Received
> 046601 #mesh-onoff STATUS
> 046602 #mesh-onoff STATUS: Sent !
> 046604 Received
> 046627 #mesh-onoff STATUS
> 046628 #mesh-onoff STATUS: Sent !
> 046630 Received
> 046656 #mesh-onoff STATUS
> 046656 #mesh-onoff STATUS: Sent !
> 046658 Received
>
>
>
> Is this what I should see? What are your symptoms?
>
> Best regards
> Michał Narajowski
>
> pt., 18 maj 2018 o 11:47 Aditya Xavier <adityaxav...@me.com> napisał(a):
>
>> Hi Łukasz,
>>
>> Disabling only the following flags in syscfg.yml allows the device to
>> receive but not send mesh messages.
>>
>> BLE_ROLE_BROADCASTER: 1
>> BLE_ROLE_PERIPHERAL: 1
>>
>> Disabling BLE_EXT_ADV: 1, flag allows the device to send and receive mesh
>> messages.
>>
>> And as I said earlier enabling all three of them, does not allow the
>> device to send / receive mesh messages.
>>
>> It is quite possible its a mistake on my end. Would be grateful if you let
>> me know what am I doing wrong :)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Aditya Xavier.
>>
>>
>>> On 18-May-2018, at 2:59 PM, Aditya Xavier <adityaxav...@me.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Łukasz,
>>>
>>> Am actually sending it to the Group Address.
>>>
>>> In main.c :- Line 27
>>> void button_cb(struct os_event *ev)
>>> {
>>> mesh_msg_send(MODEL_ID_CBOR_ACTION, GROUP_ADDR, "HELLO WORLD", 12);
>>>
>>> }
>>>
>>> And its relevant method :-
>>>
>>> In mesh_init.c :- Line 138.
>>> void mesh_msg_send(uint16_t model_id, uint16_t target_address, char
>> *tmsg, uint16_t tlen)
>>> {
>>> struct os_mbuf *msg = NET_BUF_SIMPLE(10 + tlen);
>>> struct bt_mesh_msg_ctx ctx = {
>>> .net_idx = net_idx,
>>> .app_idx = app_idx,
>>> // .addr = node_address,
>>> // .addr = GROUP_ADDR,
>>> .addr = target_address,
>>> .send_ttl = BT_MESH_TTL_MAX,
>>> };
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Which I registered here :-
>>> In mesh_init.c :- Line 129.
>>> * Add model subscription */
>>> bt_mesh_cfg_mod_sub_add_vnd(net_idx, node_address, node_address,
>> GROUP_ADDR,
>>> MOD_LF, CID_VENDOR, NULL);
>>>
>>> Also, I believe the mesh_msg_send is correctly because it works
>> correctly when I switch off the following flags.
>>>
>>> BLE_ROLE_BROADCASTER: 1
>>> BLE_ROLE_PERIPHERAL: 1
>>> BLE_EXT_ADV: 1
>>>
>>> Please do correct me if am wrong.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Aditya Xavier.
>>>
>>>> On 18-May-2018, at 2:53 PM, Łukasz Rymanowski <
>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Aditya,
>>>>
>>>> Sending to destination with same address as source will result in
>> sending
>>>> msg to source. It will not go into the air.
>>>>
>>>> Best
>>>> Łukasz
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 17 May 2018 at 12:21, Aditya Xavier <adityaxav...@me.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Łukasz,
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry for the late reply.
>>>>>
>>>>> I created a test application for BLE + MESH co-existence, to test the
>>>>> functionality and your patch.
>>>>>
>>>>> The following are my observations.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. On enabling any of the following flags, MESH is unable to send
>> /
>>>>> receive messages don’t work. (Using mesh_model_send)
>>>>>
>>>>> BLE_ROLE_BROADCASTER: 1
>>>>> BLE_ROLE_PERIPHERAL: 1
>>>>> BLE_EXT_ADV: 1
>>>>>
>>>>> 2. Incase using the same Node_Address on two devices, send/
>> receive
>>>>> messages don't work. ( This might be as per protocol specifications,
>> am not
>>>>> aware)
>>>>>
>>>>> You can try the application to verify the same.
>>>>> 1. Do remember the node_address value should be unique. You can
>>>>> change the same in mesh_init.c
>>>>> 2. You can enable BLE / mesh by changing the relevant value in
>>>>> headers.h ( ble_enable and mesh_enable )
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Please let me know your findings and in case of any mistake on my part,
>>>>> please let me know.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for looking into it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Aditya Xavier.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 15-May-2018, at 7:59 PM, Łukasz Rymanowski <
>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Aditya,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 12 May 2018 at 08:23, Aditya Xavier <adityaxav...@me.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Łukasz,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for looking into it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As per the documentation,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To make use of it application needs to set BLE_EXT_ADV and
>>>>>>> BLE_MULTI_ADV_INSTANCES at least to 1. Mesh will use last available
>>>>>>> advertising instance for PB-ADV and second to last for PB-GATT and
>>>>>>> PROXY
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What would happen when the Application is not utilizing PB-ADV /
>>>>> PB-GATT ?
>>>>>>> i.e. provisioned Mesh Instance co-existing with a BLE instance ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ah this is error in the documentation. Instead of PB_ADV/GATT It
>> should
>>>>> be
>>>>>> ADV bearer and GATT bearer. Actually also name of #defines
>>>>>> BLE_ADV_PB_ADV/GATT_IDX is not good. Thanks for pointing it out. Would
>>>>> you
>>>>>> mind to send PR for this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In general, when BLE_EXT_ADV is enabled and application wants to use
>> BLE
>>>>>> instance and Mesh, then
>>>>>> a) BLE_MULTI_ADV_INSTANCES shall be set at least to 1 if ADV bearer
>> is
>>>>> used
>>>>>> b) BLE_MULTI_ADV_INSTANCES shall be set at least to 2 if ADV and GATT
>>>>>> bearer is used
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Trying to understand whether this would require me to enable PB-ADV /
>>>>>>> PB-GATT because my application uses neither.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There should be no need for this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Similarly, please correct me if am wrong but I would need to set
>>>>>>> BLE_MULTI_ADV_INSTANCES to 2 to have MESH and BLE coexist.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, 1 is enough. It is because BLE_MULTI_ADV_INSTANCES stays for an
>>>>>> additional instances. There is always one available.
>>>>>> Actually I understand that name 'BLE_MULTI_ADV_INSTANCES' might be
>>>>>> confusing. Hopefully decryption of this flag in nimble/syscfg.yml
>> makes
>>>>> it
>>>>>> clear.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Aditya Xavier.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best
>>>>>> Łukasz
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10-May-2018, at 1:16 PM, Łukasz Rymanowski <
>>>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We found the issue which was related to latest controller changes.
>>>>>>>> Basically controller does not allow now to mix legacy HCI with ext
>> adv
>>>>>>> HCI
>>>>>>>> which of course is good. The PR
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/pull/8 is fixed now.
>>>>>>>> I removed RFC and I plan to merge it soon.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> @Aditya - feedback very welcome.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> \Łukasz
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 7 May 2018 at 13:41, Łukasz Rymanowski <
>>>>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Aditya,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sorry for late answer.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Could you please provide btmon logs along with console logs so we
>> can
>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>> you to analyze what is going on?
>>>>>>>>> Here is instruction how to get btmon logs:
>>>>>>>>> https://www.codecoup.pl/blog/support-for-btmon-in-mynewt/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks and best regards
>>>>>>>>> Łukasz
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 at 11:48, Aditya Xavier <adityaxav...@me.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Łukasz,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Any update on it? Were you able to check this ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Bt_mesh_model_send does not work after enabling BLE_EXT_ADV..
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Or, can you give me a sample code where it works so that I can
>> check
>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>> there is something am doing wrong.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Aditya Xavier.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 20-Apr-2018, at 3:56 PM, Aditya Xavier <adityaxav...@me.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Łukasz,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, was able to build btshell + blemesh into nrf52832.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I think I found an issue with regards to bt_mesh_model_send
>> method.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It seems bt_mesh_model_send is no longer working.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In my test app, I have remove all ble code, and using only
>> blemesh (
>>>>>>>>>> auto provisioning ) and send a message to another device over mesh
>>>>> on a
>>>>>>>>>> press of a button.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> When I disable BLE_EXT_ADV and BLE_MULTI_ADV_INSTANCES, it works.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Can you try and confirm it works ?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> Aditya Xavier
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19-Apr-2018, at 2:00 PM, Łukasz Rymanowski <
>>>>>>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl <mailto:
>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Aditya,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to hack around flash map instead of removing code.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I would do something like this (hopefully calculations are OK).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/hw/bsp/nrf52dk/bsp.yml
>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -41,11 +41,11 @@ bsp.flash_map:
>>>>>>>>>>>> FLASH_AREA_IMAGE_0:
>>>>>>>>>>>> device: 0
>>>>>>>>>>>> offset: 0x00008000
>>>>>>>>>>>> - size: 232kB
>>>>>>>>>>>> + size: 462kB
>>>>>>>>>>>> FLASH_AREA_IMAGE_1:
>>>>>>>>>>>> device: 0
>>>>>>>>>>>> - offset: 0x00042000
>>>>>>>>>>>> - size: 232kB
>>>>>>>>>>>> + offset: 0x0007B800
>>>>>>>>>>>> + size: 2kB
>>>>>>>>>>>> FLASH_AREA_IMAGE_SCRATCH:
>>>>>>>>>>>> device: 0
>>>>>>>>>>>> offset: 0x0007c000
>>>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/hw/bsp/nrf52dk/nrf52xxaa.ld
>>>>>>> b/hw/bsp/nrf52dk/nrf52xxaa.ld
>>>>>>>>>>>> index 9433e37fd..55e293da1 100644
>>>>>>>>>>>> --- a/hw/bsp/nrf52dk/nrf52xxaa.ld
>>>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/hw/bsp/nrf52dk/nrf52xxaa.ld
>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
>>>>>>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>>>>>>> MEMORY
>>>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLASH (rx) : ORIGIN = 0x00008000, LENGTH = 0x3a000
>>>>>>>>>>>> + FLASH (rx) : ORIGIN = 0x00008000, LENGTH = 0x73800
>>>>>>>>>>>> RAM (rwx) : ORIGIN = 0x20000000, LENGTH = 0x10000
>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Make sure to rebuild boot and app and then try.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>>>>>> Łukasz
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19 April 2018 at 07:30, Aditya Xavier <adityaxav...@me.com
>>>>>>> <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>> adityaxav...@me.com> <mailto:adityaxav...@me.com <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>> adityaxav...@me.com>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Łukasz,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> PFA the app I used to test Mesh using multi advertising
>> instances.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I get the following error.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ts=275343728ssb, mod=4 level=3] adv_send: Advertising failed:
>>>>> err 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I had to comment out a lot of code to get it in a flash-able
>> size.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aditya Xavier.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18-Apr-2018, at 1:13 PM, Aditya Xavier <adityaxav...@me.com
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:adityaxav...@me.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Łukasz,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am using nrf52832, hence the problem of flash overflow.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would create a test app, using btshell + blemesh + the flags
>> which
>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> recommended, and test again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aditya Xavier.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18-Apr-2018, at 12:29 PM, Łukasz Rymanowski <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl <mailto:
>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Aditya,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there is flash overflow consider removing some features from
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What HW are you using? We are running on nrf52840
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW There is no special application. It is btshell plus those 4
>>>>>>> flags
>>>>>>>>>> (
>>>>>>>>>>>>> BLE_EXT_ADV, BLE_MULTI_ADV_INSTANCES, BLE_MESH,
>> BLE_MESH_SHELL) .
>>>>>>> Of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> course you need my PR. I did not test it personally, but I
>> know
>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>> worked
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for Michal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please share your target configuration,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Łukasz
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17 April 2018 at 12:04, Aditya Xavier <adityaxav...@me.com
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:adityaxav...@me.com> <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> adityaxav...@me.com <mailto:adityaxav...@me.com> <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>> adityaxav...@me.com <mailto:adityaxav...@me.com>> <
>>>>> adityaxav...@me.com
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:adityaxav...@me.com> <mailto:adityaxav...@me.com <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>> adityaxav...@me.com>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Łukasz,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Been trying to join both blemesh_shell and bt_shell, but there
>> is
>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem of flash overflow.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Created another app, which basically is btshell and some
>> portions
>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> blemesh, but that didn’t work.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is it possible for you to share a sample / test app ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aditya Xavier.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10-Apr-2018, at 1:09 PM, Łukasz Rymanowski <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl <mailto:
>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Michał, Aditya,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just upload a new version of PR:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/pull/8 <
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/pull/8> <
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/pull/8 <
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/pull/8>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It contains fixes for the problem mentioned above, however
>>>>> solution
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> bit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> different from what Michał suggested.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @MIchał, could you take a look?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Aditya, Could you be able to test it and give us a feedback on
>>>>>>> this?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Łukasz
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6 April 2018 at 14:08, Michał Narajowski <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> michal.narajow...@codecoup.pl <mailto:
>>>>> michal.narajow...@codecoup.pl
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:michal.narajow...@codecoup.pl <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>> michal.narajow...@codecoup.pl>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Aditya,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mesh is using Adv extensions under the hood if you have
>> Łukasz's
>>>>>>> patch
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and enable BLE_EXT_ADV and set BLE_MULTI_ADV_INSTANCES to at
>> least
>>>>>>> 1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blemesh_shell has a command "init" which initializes mesh stack
>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> starts advertising Unprovisioned Mesh Beacon.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I tested this now and I noticed a bug. Here is a patch for that
>>>>> bug:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://pastebin.com/gbyX8H56 <https://pastebin.com/gbyX8H56>
>> <
>>>>>>>>>> https://pastebin.com/gbyX8H56 <https://pastebin.com/gbyX8H56>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please apply it on top of Łukasz's branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hope that helps. Let us know how it works for you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> BR,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Michał
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2018-04-06 11:09 GMT+02:00 Aditya Xavier <adityaxav...@me.com
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:adityaxav...@me.com> <mailto:adityaxav...@me.com <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>> adityaxav...@me.com>>>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Michał / Łukasz,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have been trying to understand the blemesh_shell, and I fail
>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> understand how / where it is using the Advertisement
>> extensions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Basically, could you point me towards the difference if I need
>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> implement, in order to use blemesh instead.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> From what I gathered / understood after going through the code
>> is
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> blemesh_shell basically allows various functions to be
>> triggered
>>>>>>>>>> through
>>>>>>>>>>>>> shell commands.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aditya Xavier.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 03-Apr-2018, at 3:54 PM, Michał Narajowski <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> michal.narajow...@codecoup.pl <mailto:
>>>>> michal.narajow...@codecoup.pl
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:michal.narajow...@codecoup.pl <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>> michal.narajow...@codecoup.pl>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Aditya,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please set BLE_MESH: 1 and BLE_MESH_SHELL: 1 and you should be
>>>>> able
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> use both btshell and mesh shell. Let us know how that works for
>>>>> you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> av...@gmail.com <mailto:av...@gmail.com> <mailto:
>> av...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:av...@gmail.com>> <mailto:av...@gmail.com <mailto:
>>>>>>> av...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:av...@gmail.com <mailto:av...@gmail.com>> <
>> av...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:av...@gmail.com> <mailto:av...@gmail.com <mailto:
>>>>>>> av...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Michał
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2018-04-03 7:56 GMT+02:00 Aditya Xavier <adityaxav...@me.com
>>>>>>> <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>> adityaxav...@me.com> <mailto:adityaxav...@me.com <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>> adityaxav...@me.com>> <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> adityaxav...@me.com <mailto:adityaxav...@me.com> <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>> adityaxav...@me.com <mailto:adityaxav...@me.com>> <
>>>>> adityaxav...@me.com
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:adityaxav...@me.com> <mailto:adityaxav...@me.com <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>> adityaxav...@me.com>>>>>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Łukasz,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any pointers, as to what needs to be implemented from the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> blemesh_shell app ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aditya Xavier.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 02-Apr-2018, at 11:34 PM, Łukasz Rymanowski <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl <mailto:
>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl>> <mailto:
>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl> <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl <mailto:
>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl <mailto:
>>>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl>
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Second thought
>>>>>>>>>>>>> av...@gmail.com <mailto:av...@gmail.com> <mailto:
>> av...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:av...@gmail.com>> <mailto:av...@gmail.com <mailto:
>>>>>>> av...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:av...@gmail.com <mailto:av...@gmail.com>> <
>> av...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:av...@gmail.com> <mailto:av...@gmail.com <mailto:
>>>>>>> av...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aditya,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since I did not test it a lot, would it be possible to give us
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback how
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it works for you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lukasz
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018, 20:01 Łukasz Rymanowski <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Aditya.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018, 19:14 Aditya Xavier <adityaxav...@me.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Łukasz,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there anything special required to get this working along
>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> BLE ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For e.g. would the btshell app code for ADV_EXT work along with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mesh with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the provided patches ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In addition to configuration mentioned in PR commit message,
>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> btshell
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> app would have to enable ble mesh and ble mesh shell (check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> blemesh_shell
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> app for that)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mesh and BLE seems to compile however, am currently unable to
>> get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mesh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> working.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, any reason why this was not accepted yet ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> People are busy with other stuff I guess. I think it will be
>>>>> merged
>>>>>>>>>>>>> eventually.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aditya Xavier.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lukasz
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20-Mar-2018, at 12:57 AM, Sterling Hughes <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sterling.hughes.pub...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 - this is great, thanks Lukasz!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19 Mar 2018, at 6:36, Łukasz Rymanowski wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I saw people asking around about possibility to advertise with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-mesh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> data while mesh is running on Mynewt. Well this is possible to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> do but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> course it brings a lot of risk for mesh operations and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> especially
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> friendship scenario. However I went ahead and added support for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> this in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mynewt and I'm interested in how it works for you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So here is a PR which makes use of multi instances from BT5
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Advertising
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> extensions and basically allows you to create additional
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> instances
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> contains non-mesh data.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/pull/8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Instructions on how to enable it you can find in the commit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> message.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Comments are welcome
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Łukasz
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
