Hi Aditya,
BLE_ROLE_BROADCASTER should not have an impact on this. There is only one
place in the code where this is used:
include/nimble/nimble_opt_auto.h:37: #define NIMBLE_BLE_ADVERTISE
\
(MYNEWT_VAL(BLE_ROLE_BROADCASTER) || MYNEWT_VAL(BLE_ROLE_PERIPHERAL))
Best regards
Michał Narajowski
pt., 18 maj 2018 o 14:02 Aditya Xavier <adityaxav...@me.com> napisał(a):
> Hi Michał,
>
> A correction.
>
> It seems its out of the two BLE_ROLE* flags, its only BLE_ROLE_BROADCASTER
> that has an adverse effect.
> Enabling BLE_ROLE_BROADCASTER stops the device from receiving messages.
>
> Thanks,
> Aditya Xavier.
>
>
>
>
> > On 18-May-2018, at 3:44 PM, Aditya Xavier <adityaxav...@me.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Michał,
> >
> > Yes, that is what you should be seeing, because the message is being
> sent to the GROUP; originator receives it as well.
> > If you change it to the destination / target address, you wouldn’t see
> Received.
> >
> > To test this, you would require two devices.
> >
> > Assuming Device A and B.
> >
> > With all three flags disabled and unique address ( node_address in
> mesh_init.c Line 28).
> > Device A ( button Pressed ) -> Device B should say in the Log Received.
> ( Model callback method - mesh_init.c Line 78 )
> > Device B ( button Pressed ) -> Device A should say in the Log Received.
> >
> > With all three flags enabled and unique node_address.
> > Device A ( button Pressed )-> Device B will not receive any message.
> > Device B ( button Pressed )-> Device A will not receive any message.
> >
> > With only BLE_ROLE* flags disabled on Device B and all three flags
> disabled on Device B, and unique node_address.
> > Device A ( button Pressed )-> Device B should say in the Log Received.
> > Device B ( button Pressed )-> Device A will not receive any message.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Aditya Xavier.
> >
> >
> >> On 18-May-2018, at 3:23 PM, Michał Narajowski <
> michal.narajow...@codecoup.pl> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Aditya,
> >>
> >> I enabled these flags:
> >>
> >> BLE_ROLE_BROADCASTER: 1
> >> BLE_ROLE_PERIPHERAL: 1
> >> BLE_EXT_ADV: 1
> >>
> >> And this is what i see after pushing the button a few times:
> >>
> >> 045120 #mesh-onoff STATUS
> >> 045121 #mesh-onoff STATUS: Sent !
> >> 045123 Received
> >> 045263 #mesh-onoff STATUS
> >> 045264 #mesh-onoff STATUS: Sent !
> >> 045266 Received
> >> 045402 #mesh-onoff STATUS
> >> 045402 #mesh-onoff STATUS: Sent !
> >> 045404 Received
> >> 045535 #mesh-onoff STATUS
> >> 045536 #mesh-onoff STATUS: Sent !
> >> 045538 Received
> >> 046559 #mesh-onoff STATUS
> >> 046559 #mesh-onoff STATUS: Sent !
> >> 046561 Received
> >> 046601 #mesh-onoff STATUS
> >> 046602 #mesh-onoff STATUS: Sent !
> >> 046604 Received
> >> 046627 #mesh-onoff STATUS
> >> 046628 #mesh-onoff STATUS: Sent !
> >> 046630 Received
> >> 046656 #mesh-onoff STATUS
> >> 046656 #mesh-onoff STATUS: Sent !
> >> 046658 Received
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Is this what I should see? What are your symptoms?
> >>
> >> Best regards
> >> Michał Narajowski
> >>
> >> pt., 18 maj 2018 o 11:47 Aditya Xavier <adityaxav...@me.com>
> napisał(a):
> >>
> >>> Hi Łukasz,
> >>>
> >>> Disabling only the following flags in syscfg.yml allows the device to
> >>> receive but not send mesh messages.
> >>>
> >>> BLE_ROLE_BROADCASTER: 1
> >>> BLE_ROLE_PERIPHERAL: 1
> >>>
> >>> Disabling BLE_EXT_ADV: 1, flag allows the device to send and receive
> mesh
> >>> messages.
> >>>
> >>> And as I said earlier enabling all three of them, does not allow the
> >>> device to send / receive mesh messages.
> >>>
> >>> It is quite possible its a mistake on my end. Would be grateful if you
> let
> >>> me know what am I doing wrong :)
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Aditya Xavier.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On 18-May-2018, at 2:59 PM, Aditya Xavier <adityaxav...@me.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Łukasz,
> >>>>
> >>>> Am actually sending it to the Group Address.
> >>>>
> >>>> In main.c :- Line 27
> >>>> void button_cb(struct os_event *ev)
> >>>> {
> >>>> mesh_msg_send(MODEL_ID_CBOR_ACTION, GROUP_ADDR, "HELLO WORLD", 12);
> >>>>
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> And its relevant method :-
> >>>>
> >>>> In mesh_init.c :- Line 138.
> >>>> void mesh_msg_send(uint16_t model_id, uint16_t target_address, char
> >>> *tmsg, uint16_t tlen)
> >>>> {
> >>>> struct os_mbuf *msg = NET_BUF_SIMPLE(10 + tlen);
> >>>> struct bt_mesh_msg_ctx ctx = {
> >>>> .net_idx = net_idx,
> >>>> .app_idx = app_idx,
> >>>> // .addr = node_address,
> >>>> // .addr = GROUP_ADDR,
> >>>> .addr = target_address,
> >>>> .send_ttl = BT_MESH_TTL_MAX,
> >>>> };
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Which I registered here :-
> >>>> In mesh_init.c :- Line 129.
> >>>> * Add model subscription */
> >>>> bt_mesh_cfg_mod_sub_add_vnd(net_idx, node_address, node_address,
> >>> GROUP_ADDR,
> >>>> MOD_LF, CID_VENDOR, NULL);
> >>>>
> >>>> Also, I believe the mesh_msg_send is correctly because it works
> >>> correctly when I switch off the following flags.
> >>>>
> >>>> BLE_ROLE_BROADCASTER: 1
> >>>> BLE_ROLE_PERIPHERAL: 1
> >>>> BLE_EXT_ADV: 1
> >>>>
> >>>> Please do correct me if am wrong.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Aditya Xavier.
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 18-May-2018, at 2:53 PM, Łukasz Rymanowski <
> >>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi Aditya,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sending to destination with same address as source will result in
> >>> sending
> >>>>> msg to source. It will not go into the air.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best
> >>>>> Łukasz
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, 17 May 2018 at 12:21, Aditya Xavier <adityaxav...@me.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Łukasz,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Sorry for the late reply.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I created a test application for BLE + MESH co-existence, to test
> the
> >>>>>> functionality and your patch.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The following are my observations.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 1. On enabling any of the following flags, MESH is unable to
> send
> >>> /
> >>>>>> receive messages don’t work. (Using mesh_model_send)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> BLE_ROLE_BROADCASTER: 1
> >>>>>> BLE_ROLE_PERIPHERAL: 1
> >>>>>> BLE_EXT_ADV: 1
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 2. Incase using the same Node_Address on two devices, send/
> >>> receive
> >>>>>> messages don't work. ( This might be as per protocol specifications,
> >>> am not
> >>>>>> aware)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You can try the application to verify the same.
> >>>>>> 1. Do remember the node_address value should be unique. You can
> >>>>>> change the same in mesh_init.c
> >>>>>> 2. You can enable BLE / mesh by changing the relevant value in
> >>>>>> headers.h ( ble_enable and mesh_enable )
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Please let me know your findings and in case of any mistake on my
> part,
> >>>>>> please let me know.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks for looking into it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Aditya Xavier.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 15-May-2018, at 7:59 PM, Łukasz Rymanowski <
> >>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi Aditya,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Sat, 12 May 2018 at 08:23, Aditya Xavier <adityaxav...@me.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi Łukasz,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks for looking into it.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> As per the documentation,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> To make use of it application needs to set BLE_EXT_ADV and
> >>>>>>>> BLE_MULTI_ADV_INSTANCES at least to 1. Mesh will use last
> available
> >>>>>>>> advertising instance for PB-ADV and second to last for PB-GATT and
> >>>>>>>> PROXY
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> What would happen when the Application is not utilizing PB-ADV /
> >>>>>> PB-GATT ?
> >>>>>>>> i.e. provisioned Mesh Instance co-existing with a BLE instance ?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Ah this is error in the documentation. Instead of PB_ADV/GATT It
> >>> should
> >>>>>> be
> >>>>>>> ADV bearer and GATT bearer. Actually also name of #defines
> >>>>>>> BLE_ADV_PB_ADV/GATT_IDX is not good. Thanks for pointing it out.
> Would
> >>>>>> you
> >>>>>>> mind to send PR for this?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In general, when BLE_EXT_ADV is enabled and application wants to
> use
> >>> BLE
> >>>>>>> instance and Mesh, then
> >>>>>>> a) BLE_MULTI_ADV_INSTANCES shall be set at least to 1 if ADV
> bearer
> >>> is
> >>>>>> used
> >>>>>>> b) BLE_MULTI_ADV_INSTANCES shall be set at least to 2 if ADV and
> GATT
> >>>>>>> bearer is used
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Trying to understand whether this would require me to enable
> PB-ADV /
> >>>>>>>> PB-GATT because my application uses neither.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> There should be no need for this.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Similarly, please correct me if am wrong but I would need to set
> >>>>>>>> BLE_MULTI_ADV_INSTANCES to 2 to have MESH and BLE coexist.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> No, 1 is enough. It is because BLE_MULTI_ADV_INSTANCES stays for
> an
> >>>>>>> additional instances. There is always one available.
> >>>>>>> Actually I understand that name 'BLE_MULTI_ADV_INSTANCES' might be
> >>>>>>> confusing. Hopefully decryption of this flag in nimble/syscfg.yml
> >>> makes
> >>>>>> it
> >>>>>>> clear.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>> Aditya Xavier.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Best
> >>>>>>> Łukasz
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 10-May-2018, at 1:16 PM, Łukasz Rymanowski <
> >>>>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> We found the issue which was related to latest controller
> changes.
> >>>>>>>>> Basically controller does not allow now to mix legacy HCI with
> ext
> >>> adv
> >>>>>>>> HCI
> >>>>>>>>> which of course is good. The PR
> >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/pull/8 is fixed now.
> >>>>>>>>> I removed RFC and I plan to merge it soon.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> @Aditya - feedback very welcome.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> \Łukasz
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 7 May 2018 at 13:41, Łukasz Rymanowski <
> >>>>>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Aditya,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Sorry for late answer.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Could you please provide btmon logs along with console logs so
> we
> >>> can
> >>>>>>>> help
> >>>>>>>>>> you to analyze what is going on?
> >>>>>>>>>> Here is instruction how to get btmon logs:
> >>>>>>>>>> https://www.codecoup.pl/blog/support-for-btmon-in-mynewt/
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks and best regards
> >>>>>>>>>> Łukasz
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 at 11:48, Aditya Xavier <
> adityaxav...@me.com>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Łukasz,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Any update on it? Were you able to check this ?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Bt_mesh_model_send does not work after enabling BLE_EXT_ADV..
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Or, can you give me a sample code where it works so that I can
> >>> check
> >>>>>> if
> >>>>>>>>>>> there is something am doing wrong.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>> Aditya Xavier.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 20-Apr-2018, at 3:56 PM, Aditya Xavier <
> adityaxav...@me.com>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Łukasz,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, was able to build btshell + blemesh into nrf52832.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I think I found an issue with regards to bt_mesh_model_send
> >>> method.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> It seems bt_mesh_model_send is no longer working.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> In my test app, I have remove all ble code, and using only
> >>> blemesh (
> >>>>>>>>>>> auto provisioning ) and send a message to another device over
> mesh
> >>>>>> on a
> >>>>>>>>>>> press of a button.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> When I disable BLE_EXT_ADV and BLE_MULTI_ADV_INSTANCES, it
> works.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Can you try and confirm it works ?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Aditya Xavier
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19-Apr-2018, at 2:00 PM, Łukasz Rymanowski <
> >>>>>>>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl <mailto:
> >>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Aditya,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to hack around flash map instead of removing code.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I would do something like this (hopefully calculations are
> OK).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/hw/bsp/nrf52dk/bsp.yml
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -41,11 +41,11 @@ bsp.flash_map:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> FLASH_AREA_IMAGE_0:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> device: 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> offset: 0x00008000
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> - size: 232kB
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + size: 462kB
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> FLASH_AREA_IMAGE_1:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> device: 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> - offset: 0x00042000
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> - size: 232kB
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + offset: 0x0007B800
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + size: 2kB
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> FLASH_AREA_IMAGE_SCRATCH:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> device: 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> offset: 0x0007c000
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/hw/bsp/nrf52dk/nrf52xxaa.ld
> >>>>>>>> b/hw/bsp/nrf52dk/nrf52xxaa.ld
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> index 9433e37fd..55e293da1 100644
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> --- a/hw/bsp/nrf52dk/nrf52xxaa.ld
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/hw/bsp/nrf52dk/nrf52xxaa.ld
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> */
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> MEMORY
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> {
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLASH (rx) : ORIGIN = 0x00008000, LENGTH = 0x3a000
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + FLASH (rx) : ORIGIN = 0x00008000, LENGTH = 0x73800
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> RAM (rwx) : ORIGIN = 0x20000000, LENGTH = 0x10000
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Make sure to rebuild boot and app and then try.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Łukasz
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19 April 2018 at 07:30, Aditya Xavier <
> adityaxav...@me.com
> >>>>>>>> <mailto:
> >>>>>>>>>>> adityaxav...@me.com> <mailto:adityaxav...@me.com <mailto:
> >>>>>>>>>>> adityaxav...@me.com>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Łukasz,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> PFA the app I used to test Mesh using multi advertising
> >>> instances.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I get the following error.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ts=275343728ssb, mod=4 level=3] adv_send: Advertising
> failed:
> >>>>>> err 3
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I had to comment out a lot of code to get it in a flash-able
> >>> size.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aditya Xavier.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18-Apr-2018, at 1:13 PM, Aditya Xavier <
> adityaxav...@me.com
> >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:adityaxav...@me.com>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Łukasz,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am using nrf52832, hence the problem of flash overflow.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would create a test app, using btshell + blemesh + the flags
> >>> which
> >>>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> recommended, and test again.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aditya Xavier.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18-Apr-2018, at 12:29 PM, Łukasz Rymanowski <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl <mailto:
> >>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Aditya,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there is flash overflow consider removing some features
> from
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What HW are you using? We are running on nrf52840
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW There is no special application. It is btshell plus
> those 4
> >>>>>>>> flags
> >>>>>>>>>>> (
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> BLE_EXT_ADV, BLE_MULTI_ADV_INSTANCES, BLE_MESH,
> >>> BLE_MESH_SHELL) .
> >>>>>>>> Of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> course you need my PR. I did not test it personally, but I
> >>> know
> >>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>>> worked
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for Michal.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please share your target configuration,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Łukasz
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17 April 2018 at 12:04, Aditya Xavier <
> adityaxav...@me.com
> >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:adityaxav...@me.com> <mailto:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> adityaxav...@me.com <mailto:adityaxav...@me.com> <mailto:
> >>>>>>>>>>> adityaxav...@me.com <mailto:adityaxav...@me.com>> <
> >>>>>> adityaxav...@me.com
> >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:adityaxav...@me.com> <mailto:adityaxav...@me.com
> <mailto:
> >>>>>>>>>>> adityaxav...@me.com>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Łukasz,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Been trying to join both blemesh_shell and bt_shell, but
> there
> >>> is
> >>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem of flash overflow.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Created another app, which basically is btshell and some
> >>> portions
> >>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> blemesh, but that didn’t work.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is it possible for you to share a sample / test app ?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aditya Xavier.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10-Apr-2018, at 1:09 PM, Łukasz Rymanowski <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl <mailto:
> >>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl <mailto:
> >>>>>>>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Michał, Aditya,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just upload a new version of PR:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/pull/8 <
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/pull/8> <
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/pull/8 <
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/pull/8>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It contains fixes for the problem mentioned above, however
> >>>>>> solution
> >>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> different from what Michał suggested.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> @MIchał, could you take a look?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Aditya, Could you be able to test it and give us a
> feedback on
> >>>>>>>> this?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Łukasz
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6 April 2018 at 14:08, Michał Narajowski <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> michal.narajow...@codecoup.pl <mailto:
> >>>>>> michal.narajow...@codecoup.pl
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:michal.narajow...@codecoup.pl <mailto:
> >>>>>>>>>>> michal.narajow...@codecoup.pl>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Aditya,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mesh is using Adv extensions under the hood if you have
> >>> Łukasz's
> >>>>>>>> patch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and enable BLE_EXT_ADV and set BLE_MULTI_ADV_INSTANCES to at
> >>> least
> >>>>>>>> 1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blemesh_shell has a command "init" which initializes mesh
> stack
> >>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> starts advertising Unprovisioned Mesh Beacon.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I tested this now and I noticed a bug. Here is a patch for
> that
> >>>>>> bug:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://pastebin.com/gbyX8H56 <
> https://pastebin.com/gbyX8H56>
> >>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://pastebin.com/gbyX8H56 <https://pastebin.com/gbyX8H56>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please apply it on top of Łukasz's branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hope that helps. Let us know how it works for you.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> BR,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Michał
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2018-04-06 11:09 GMT+02:00 Aditya Xavier <
> adityaxav...@me.com
> >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:adityaxav...@me.com> <mailto:adityaxav...@me.com
> <mailto:
> >>>>>>>>>>> adityaxav...@me.com>>>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Michał / Łukasz,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have been trying to understand the blemesh_shell, and I
> fail
> >>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> understand how / where it is using the Advertisement
> >>> extensions.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Basically, could you point me towards the difference if I
> need
> >>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> implement, in order to use blemesh instead.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From what I gathered / understood after going through the
> code
> >>> is
> >>>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> blemesh_shell basically allows various functions to be
> >>> triggered
> >>>>>>>>>>> through
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> shell commands.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aditya Xavier.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 03-Apr-2018, at 3:54 PM, Michał Narajowski <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> michal.narajow...@codecoup.pl <mailto:
> >>>>>> michal.narajow...@codecoup.pl
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:michal.narajow...@codecoup.pl <mailto:
> >>>>>>>>>>> michal.narajow...@codecoup.pl>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Aditya,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please set BLE_MESH: 1 and BLE_MESH_SHELL: 1 and you should
> be
> >>>>>> able
> >>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> use both btshell and mesh shell. Let us know how that works
> for
> >>>>>> you.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> av...@gmail.com <mailto:av...@gmail.com> <mailto:
> >>> av...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:av...@gmail.com>> <mailto:av...@gmail.com <mailto:
> >>>>>>>> av...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:av...@gmail.com <mailto:av...@gmail.com>> <
> >>> av...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:av...@gmail.com> <mailto:av...@gmail.com <mailto:
> >>>>>>>> av...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Michał
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2018-04-03 7:56 GMT+02:00 Aditya Xavier <
> adityaxav...@me.com
> >>>>>>>> <mailto:
> >>>>>>>>>>> adityaxav...@me.com> <mailto:adityaxav...@me.com <mailto:
> >>>>>>>>>>> adityaxav...@me.com>> <mailto:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> adityaxav...@me.com <mailto:adityaxav...@me.com> <mailto:
> >>>>>>>>>>> adityaxav...@me.com <mailto:adityaxav...@me.com>> <
> >>>>>> adityaxav...@me.com
> >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:adityaxav...@me.com> <mailto:adityaxav...@me.com
> <mailto:
> >>>>>>>>>>> adityaxav...@me.com>>>>>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Łukasz,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any pointers, as to what needs to be implemented from the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> blemesh_shell app ?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aditya Xavier.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 02-Apr-2018, at 11:34 PM, Łukasz Rymanowski <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl <mailto:
> >>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl <mailto:
> >>>>>>>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl>> <mailto:
> >>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl
> >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl> <mailto:
> >>>>>>>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl <mailto:
> >>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl <mailto:
> >>>>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl>
> >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl <mailto:
> >>>>>>>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Second thought
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> av...@gmail.com <mailto:av...@gmail.com> <mailto:
> >>> av...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:av...@gmail.com>> <mailto:av...@gmail.com <mailto:
> >>>>>>>> av...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:av...@gmail.com <mailto:av...@gmail.com>> <
> >>> av...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:av...@gmail.com> <mailto:av...@gmail.com <mailto:
> >>>>>>>> av...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aditya,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since I did not test it a lot, would it be possible to give
> us
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback how
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it works for you?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lukasz
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018, 20:01 Łukasz Rymanowski <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> lukasz.rymanow...@codecoup.pl>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Aditya.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018, 19:14 Aditya Xavier <
> adityaxav...@me.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Łukasz,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there anything special required to get this working along
> >>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> BLE ?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For e.g. would the btshell app code for ADV_EXT work along
> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> mesh with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the provided patches ?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In addition to configuration mentioned in PR commit message,
> >>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> btshell
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> app would have to enable ble mesh and ble mesh shell (check
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> blemesh_shell
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> app for that)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mesh and BLE seems to compile however, am currently unable
> to
> >>> get
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mesh
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> working.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, any reason why this was not accepted yet ?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> People are busy with other stuff I guess. I think it will be
> >>>>>> merged
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> eventually.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aditya Xavier.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lukasz
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20-Mar-2018, at 12:57 AM, Sterling Hughes <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sterling.hughes.pub...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 - this is great, thanks Lukasz!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19 Mar 2018, at 6:36, Łukasz Rymanowski wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I saw people asking around about possibility to advertise
> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-mesh
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> data while mesh is running on Mynewt. Well this is
> possible to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> do but
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> course it brings a lot of risk for mesh operations and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> especially
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> friendship scenario. However I went ahead and added support
> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> this in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mynewt and I'm interested in how it works for you.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So here is a PR which makes use of multi instances from BT5
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Advertising
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> extensions and basically allows you to create additional
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> instances
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> contains non-mesh data.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/pull/8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Instructions on how to enable it you can find in the commit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> message.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Comments are welcome
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Łukasz
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
>
>
