Hi Łukasz,
Am actually sending it to the Group Address.
In main.c :- Line 27
void button_cb(struct os_event *ev)
{
mesh_msg_send(MODEL_ID_CBOR_ACTION, GROUP_ADDR, "HELLO WORLD", 12);
}
And its relevant method :-
In mesh_init.c :- Line 138.
void mesh_msg_send(uint16_t model_id, uint16_t target_address, char *tmsg,
uint16_t tlen)
{
struct os_mbuf *msg = NET_BUF_SIMPLE(10 + tlen);
struct bt_mesh_msg_ctx ctx = {
.net_idx = net_idx,
.app_idx = app_idx,
// .addr = node_address,
// .addr = GROUP_ADDR,
.addr = target_address,
.send_ttl = BT_MESH_TTL_MAX,
};
Which I registered here :-
In mesh_init.c :- Line 129.
* Add model subscription */
bt_mesh_cfg_mod_sub_add_vnd(net_idx, node_address, node_address, GROUP_ADDR,
MOD_LF, CID_VENDOR, NULL);
Also, I believe the mesh_msg_send is correctly because it works correctly when
I switch off the following flags.
BLE_ROLE_BROADCASTER: 1
BLE_ROLE_PERIPHERAL: 1
BLE_EXT_ADV: 1
Please do correct me if am wrong.
Thanks,
Aditya Xavier.
> On 18-May-2018, at 2:53 PM, Łukasz Rymanowski <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Aditya,
>
> Sending to destination with same address as source will result in sending
> msg to source. It will not go into the air.
>
> Best
> Łukasz
>
> On Thu, 17 May 2018 at 12:21, Aditya Xavier <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Łukasz,
>>
>> Sorry for the late reply.
>>
>> I created a test application for BLE + MESH co-existence, to test the
>> functionality and your patch.
>>
>> The following are my observations.
>>
>> 1. On enabling any of the following flags, MESH is unable to send /
>> receive messages don’t work. (Using mesh_model_send)
>>
>> BLE_ROLE_BROADCASTER: 1
>> BLE_ROLE_PERIPHERAL: 1
>> BLE_EXT_ADV: 1
>>
>> 2. Incase using the same Node_Address on two devices, send/ receive
>> messages don't work. ( This might be as per protocol specifications, am not
>> aware)
>>
>> You can try the application to verify the same.
>> 1. Do remember the node_address value should be unique. You can
>> change the same in mesh_init.c
>> 2. You can enable BLE / mesh by changing the relevant value in
>> headers.h ( ble_enable and mesh_enable )
>>
>>
>> Please let me know your findings and in case of any mistake on my part,
>> please let me know.
>>
>> Thanks for looking into it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Aditya Xavier.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 15-May-2018, at 7:59 PM, Łukasz Rymanowski <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Aditya,
>>>
>>> On Sat, 12 May 2018 at 08:23, Aditya Xavier <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Łukasz,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for looking into it.
>>>>
>>>> As per the documentation,
>>>>
>>>> To make use of it application needs to set BLE_EXT_ADV and
>>>> BLE_MULTI_ADV_INSTANCES at least to 1. Mesh will use last available
>>>> advertising instance for PB-ADV and second to last for PB-GATT and
>>>> PROXY
>>>>
>>>> What would happen when the Application is not utilizing PB-ADV /
>> PB-GATT ?
>>>> i.e. provisioned Mesh Instance co-existing with a BLE instance ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ah this is error in the documentation. Instead of PB_ADV/GATT It should
>> be
>>> ADV bearer and GATT bearer. Actually also name of #defines
>>> BLE_ADV_PB_ADV/GATT_IDX is not good. Thanks for pointing it out. Would
>> you
>>> mind to send PR for this?
>>>
>>> In general, when BLE_EXT_ADV is enabled and application wants to use BLE
>>> instance and Mesh, then
>>> a) BLE_MULTI_ADV_INSTANCES shall be set at least to 1 if ADV bearer is
>> used
>>> b) BLE_MULTI_ADV_INSTANCES shall be set at least to 2 if ADV and GATT
>>> bearer is used
>>>
>>>
>>>> Trying to understand whether this would require me to enable PB-ADV /
>>>> PB-GATT because my application uses neither.
>>>>
>>>
>>> There should be no need for this.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Similarly, please correct me if am wrong but I would need to set
>>>> BLE_MULTI_ADV_INSTANCES to 2 to have MESH and BLE coexist.
>>>>
>>>
>>> No, 1 is enough. It is because BLE_MULTI_ADV_INSTANCES stays for an
>>> additional instances. There is always one available.
>>> Actually I understand that name 'BLE_MULTI_ADV_INSTANCES' might be
>>> confusing. Hopefully decryption of this flag in nimble/syscfg.yml makes
>> it
>>> clear.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Aditya Xavier.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Best
>>> Łukasz
>>>
>>>
>>>>> On 10-May-2018, at 1:16 PM, Łukasz Rymanowski <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> We found the issue which was related to latest controller changes.
>>>>> Basically controller does not allow now to mix legacy HCI with ext adv
>>>> HCI
>>>>> which of course is good. The PR
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/pull/8 is fixed now.
>>>>> I removed RFC and I plan to merge it soon.
>>>>>
>>>>> @Aditya - feedback very welcome.
>>>>>
>>>>> \Łukasz
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 7 May 2018 at 13:41, Łukasz Rymanowski <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Aditya,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry for late answer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could you please provide btmon logs along with console logs so we can
>>>> help
>>>>>> you to analyze what is going on?
>>>>>> Here is instruction how to get btmon logs:
>>>>>> https://www.codecoup.pl/blog/support-for-btmon-in-mynewt/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks and best regards
>>>>>> Łukasz
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 at 11:48, Aditya Xavier <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Łukasz,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any update on it? Were you able to check this ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bt_mesh_model_send does not work after enabling BLE_EXT_ADV..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Or, can you give me a sample code where it works so that I can check
>> if
>>>>>>> there is something am doing wrong.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Aditya Xavier.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 20-Apr-2018, at 3:56 PM, Aditya Xavier <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Łukasz,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks, was able to build btshell + blemesh into nrf52832.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think I found an issue with regards to bt_mesh_model_send method.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It seems bt_mesh_model_send is no longer working.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In my test app, I have remove all ble code, and using only blemesh (
>>>>>>> auto provisioning ) and send a message to another device over mesh
>> on a
>>>>>>> press of a button.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When I disable BLE_EXT_ADV and BLE_MULTI_ADV_INSTANCES, it works.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can you try and confirm it works ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Aditya Xavier
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 19-Apr-2018, at 2:00 PM, Łukasz Rymanowski <
>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]
>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Aditya,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I suggest to hack around flash map instead of removing code.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I would do something like this (hopefully calculations are OK).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/hw/bsp/nrf52dk/bsp.yml
>>>>>>>>> @@ -41,11 +41,11 @@ bsp.flash_map:
>>>>>>>>> FLASH_AREA_IMAGE_0:
>>>>>>>>> device: 0
>>>>>>>>> offset: 0x00008000
>>>>>>>>> - size: 232kB
>>>>>>>>> + size: 462kB
>>>>>>>>> FLASH_AREA_IMAGE_1:
>>>>>>>>> device: 0
>>>>>>>>> - offset: 0x00042000
>>>>>>>>> - size: 232kB
>>>>>>>>> + offset: 0x0007B800
>>>>>>>>> + size: 2kB
>>>>>>>>> FLASH_AREA_IMAGE_SCRATCH:
>>>>>>>>> device: 0
>>>>>>>>> offset: 0x0007c000
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/hw/bsp/nrf52dk/nrf52xxaa.ld
>>>> b/hw/bsp/nrf52dk/nrf52xxaa.ld
>>>>>>>>> index 9433e37fd..55e293da1 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/hw/bsp/nrf52dk/nrf52xxaa.ld
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/hw/bsp/nrf52dk/nrf52xxaa.ld
>>>>>>>>> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
>>>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>>>> MEMORY
>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>> - FLASH (rx) : ORIGIN = 0x00008000, LENGTH = 0x3a000
>>>>>>>>> + FLASH (rx) : ORIGIN = 0x00008000, LENGTH = 0x73800
>>>>>>>>> RAM (rwx) : ORIGIN = 0x20000000, LENGTH = 0x10000
>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Make sure to rebuild boot and app and then try.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>>> Łukasz
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 19 April 2018 at 07:30, Aditya Xavier <[email protected]
>>>> <mailto:
>>>>>>> [email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:
>>>>>>> [email protected]>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Łukasz,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> PFA the app I used to test Mesh using multi advertising instances.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I get the following error.
>>>>>>>>>> [ts=275343728ssb, mod=4 level=3] adv_send: Advertising failed:
>> err 3
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I had to comment out a lot of code to get it in a flash-able size.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Aditya Xavier.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 18-Apr-2018, at 1:13 PM, Aditya Xavier <[email protected]
>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Łukasz,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Am using nrf52832, hence the problem of flash overflow.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Would create a test app, using btshell + blemesh + the flags which
>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>> recommended, and test again.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Aditya Xavier.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 18-Apr-2018, at 12:29 PM, Łukasz Rymanowski <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:
>> [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Aditya,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If there is flash overflow consider removing some features from
>> the
>>>>>>>>>> configuration.
>>>>>>>>>> What HW are you using? We are running on nrf52840
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> BTW There is no special application. It is btshell plus those 4
>>>> flags
>>>>>>> (
>>>>>>>>>> BLE_EXT_ADV, BLE_MULTI_ADV_INSTANCES, BLE_MESH, BLE_MESH_SHELL) .
>>>> Of
>>>>>>>>>> course you need my PR. I did not test it personally, but I know
>> it
>>>>>>> worked
>>>>>>>>>> for Michal.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please share your target configuration,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>>>> Łukasz
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 17 April 2018 at 12:04, Aditya Xavier <[email protected]
>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:
>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> <
>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:
>>>>>>> [email protected]>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Łukasz,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Been trying to join both blemesh_shell and bt_shell, but there is
>> a
>>>>>>>>>> problem of flash overflow.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Created another app, which basically is btshell and some portions
>> of
>>>>>>>>>> blemesh, but that didn’t work.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Is it possible for you to share a sample / test app ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Aditya Xavier.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 10-Apr-2018, at 1:09 PM, Łukasz Rymanowski <
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:
>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:
>>>>>>> [email protected]>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Michał, Aditya,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I just upload a new version of PR:
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/pull/8 <
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/pull/8> <
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/pull/8 <
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/pull/8>>
>>>>>>>>>> It contains fixes for the problem mentioned above, however
>> solution
>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> bit
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> different from what Michał suggested.
>>>>>>>>>> @MIchał, could you take a look?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> @Aditya, Could you be able to test it and give us a feedback on
>>>> this?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>>>> Łukasz
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 6 April 2018 at 14:08, Michał Narajowski <
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:
>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:
>>>>>>> [email protected]>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Aditya,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Mesh is using Adv extensions under the hood if you have Łukasz's
>>>> patch
>>>>>>>>>> and enable BLE_EXT_ADV and set BLE_MULTI_ADV_INSTANCES to at least
>>>> 1.
>>>>>>>>>> Blemesh_shell has a command "init" which initializes mesh stack
>> and
>>>>>>>>>> starts advertising Unprovisioned Mesh Beacon.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I tested this now and I noticed a bug. Here is a patch for that
>> bug:
>>>>>>>>>> https://pastebin.com/gbyX8H56 <https://pastebin.com/gbyX8H56> <
>>>>>>> https://pastebin.com/gbyX8H56 <https://pastebin.com/gbyX8H56>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please apply it on top of Łukasz's branch.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hope that helps. Let us know how it works for you.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> BR,
>>>>>>>>>> Michał
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2018-04-06 11:09 GMT+02:00 Aditya Xavier <[email protected]
>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:
>>>>>>> [email protected]>>>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Michał / Łukasz,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have been trying to understand the blemesh_shell, and I fail to
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> understand how / where it is using the Advertisement extensions.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Basically, could you point me towards the difference if I need to
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> implement, in order to use blemesh instead.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> From what I gathered / understood after going through the code is
>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> blemesh_shell basically allows various functions to be triggered
>>>>>>> through
>>>>>>>>>> shell commands.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Aditya Xavier.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 03-Apr-2018, at 3:54 PM, Michał Narajowski <
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:
>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:
>>>>>>> [email protected]>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Aditya,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please set BLE_MESH: 1 and BLE_MESH_SHELL: 1 and you should be
>> able
>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> use both btshell and mesh shell. Let us know how that works for
>> you.
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:
>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> <[email protected]
>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>>>>>> Michał
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2018-04-03 7:56 GMT+02:00 Aditya Xavier <[email protected]
>>>> <mailto:
>>>>>>> [email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:
>>>>>>> [email protected]>> <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:
>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> <
>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:
>>>>>>> [email protected]>>>>>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Łukasz,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Any pointers, as to what needs to be implemented from the
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> blemesh_shell app ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Aditya Xavier.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 02-Apr-2018, at 11:34 PM, Łukasz Rymanowski <
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:
>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:
>>>>>>> [email protected]>> <mailto:
>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:
>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:
>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:
>>>>>>> [email protected]>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Second thought
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:
>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> <[email protected]
>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Aditya,
>>>>>>>>>> Since I did not test it a lot, would it be possible to give us
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> feedback how
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> it works for you?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>>>> Lukasz
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018, 20:01 Łukasz Rymanowski <
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Aditya.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018, 19:14 Aditya Xavier <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Łukasz,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Is there anything special required to get this working along with
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> BLE ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> For e.g. would the btshell app code for ADV_EXT work along with
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> mesh with
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> the provided patches ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In addition to configuration mentioned in PR commit message, the
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> btshell
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> app would have to enable ble mesh and ble mesh shell (check
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> blemesh_shell
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> app for that)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Mesh and BLE seems to compile however, am currently unable to get
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Mesh
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> working.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Also, any reason why this was not accepted yet ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> People are busy with other stuff I guess. I think it will be
>> merged
>>>>>>>>>> eventually.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Aditya Xavier.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>>>> Lukasz
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 20-Mar-2018, at 12:57 AM, Sterling Hughes <
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1 - this is great, thanks Lukasz!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 19 Mar 2018, at 6:36, Łukasz Rymanowski wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I saw people asking around about possibility to advertise with
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> non-mesh
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> data while mesh is running on Mynewt. Well this is possible to
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> do but
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> course it brings a lot of risk for mesh operations and
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> especially
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> friendship scenario. However I went ahead and added support for
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> this in
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Mynewt and I'm interested in how it works for you.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So here is a PR which makes use of multi instances from BT5
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Advertising
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> extensions and basically allows you to create additional
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> instances
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> contains non-mesh data.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/pull/8
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Instructions on how to enable it you can find in the commit
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> message.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Comments are welcome
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>>>> Łukasz
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
