+1 looks good to me. Nice work on responding to and incorporating feedback into the report.
-Taylor > On Nov 3, 2015, at 6:14 PM, aditi hilbert <[email protected]> wrote: > > Marvin, > > Thanks for the explanation - I understand now. > > Here is the modified report. > > -------------------- > Mynewt > > Mynewt is a real-time operating system for constrained embedded systems. > > Mynewt has been incubating since 2015-10-20. > > Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: > > 1. Produce a first Apache release of downloadable RTOS image with > support for multiple peripherals and network connectivity. > 2. Develop a roadmap and release schedule for the Mynewt Operating System > 3. Expand the community, increase dev list activity, and add new > committers/pmc members. > > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be > aware of? > > Just started incubation, nothing specific to report at this time. > > How has the community developed since the last report? > > We are approximately 2 weeks into the incubation process. > > 1. Core infrastructure has been set up. Core contributors have completed > their ICLA’s. Apache accounts, mailing lists, JIRA, and website are in > place. > 2. First drop of documentation is linked to the incubator website on AFS. > 3. Participation on the @dev mailing list was seen with installation > queries > and troubleshooting questions from mentors and 1 new subscriber. > > How has the project developed since the last report? > > Early activity: > > 1. Initial code drop on Apache git repository for Mynewt RTOS for M4 and M3 > architectures in debug environment > 2. Initial code drop on Apache git repository for newt tool to build basic > RTOS images > 3. Core infrastructure is set up > > Date of last release: > > No release yet. > > When were the last committers or PMC members elected? > > Initial list of committers have been on-boarded. > No new members added on top of the initial committer list. > > Signed-off-by: > > [ ](mynewt) Sterling Hughes > [ ](mynewt) Jim Jagielski > [ ](mynewt) Justin Mclean > [ ](mynewt) Greg Stein > [ ](mynewt) P. Taylor Goetz > > Shepherd/Mentor notes: > > > >> On Nov 3, 2015, at 2:27 PM, Marvin Humphrey <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Aditi, >> >> I think what Justin is getting at is that graduation from the >> Incubator is not related to the maturity of the technology, but rather >> the maturity of the community. >> >> Apache is largely technology-agnostic -- the Foundation, and the Board >> of Directors acting on the Foundation's behalf when they oversee our >> projects, do not set technical direction for the projects, beyond >> requiring that they adhere to various policies. And thus they >> Incubator PMC, when evaluating whether a podling should graduate from >> the Incubator and be recommended as a TLP, does not care about >> project-specific technical milestones. >> >> Take a look at this "Apache Project Maturity Model" to see the kinds >> of things that the are more relevant for graduation: >> >> https://community.apache.org/apache-way/apache-project-maturity-model.html >> >> The Maturity Model is relatively new, but some podlings have started >> evaluating their progress against it as a step just prior to >> graduation, and that seems to be working out well. >> >> Marvin Humphrey >> >> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 9:19 AM, aditi hilbert <[email protected]> wrote: >>> It’s a good point. I wondered about this esp. after the discussion we had >>> yesterday about next steps. How about: >>> >>> “Add configuration subsystem and interface (API) to manage and monitor >>> embedded devices” >>> >>> thanks, >>> aditi >>> >>> >>>> On Nov 3, 2015, at 3:24 AM, Justin Mclean <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Looks good to me. >>>> >>>>> 2. Add support for additional micro controller architectures. >>>> >>>> Very minor. It’s a nice to have, but that's not really a requirement for >>>> graduation. Can we think of something else to replace it? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Justin >>>> >>> >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
