+1 -- very nice first report! Thanks, Aditi! Marvin Humphrey
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 11:57 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 looks good to me. > > Nice work on responding to and incorporating feedback into the report. > > -Taylor > >> On Nov 3, 2015, at 6:14 PM, aditi hilbert <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Marvin, >> >> Thanks for the explanation - I understand now. >> >> Here is the modified report. >> >> -------------------- >> Mynewt >> >> Mynewt is a real-time operating system for constrained embedded systems. >> >> Mynewt has been incubating since 2015-10-20. >> >> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: >> >> 1. Produce a first Apache release of downloadable RTOS image with >> support for multiple peripherals and network connectivity. >> 2. Develop a roadmap and release schedule for the Mynewt Operating System >> 3. Expand the community, increase dev list activity, and add new >> committers/pmc members. >> >> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be >> aware of? >> >> Just started incubation, nothing specific to report at this time. >> >> How has the community developed since the last report? >> >> We are approximately 2 weeks into the incubation process. >> >> 1. Core infrastructure has been set up. Core contributors have completed >> their ICLA’s. Apache accounts, mailing lists, JIRA, and website are in >> place. >> 2. First drop of documentation is linked to the incubator website on AFS. >> 3. Participation on the @dev mailing list was seen with installation >> queries >> and troubleshooting questions from mentors and 1 new subscriber. >> >> How has the project developed since the last report? >> >> Early activity: >> >> 1. Initial code drop on Apache git repository for Mynewt RTOS for M4 and M3 >> architectures in debug environment >> 2. Initial code drop on Apache git repository for newt tool to build basic >> RTOS images >> 3. Core infrastructure is set up >> >> Date of last release: >> >> No release yet. >> >> When were the last committers or PMC members elected? >> >> Initial list of committers have been on-boarded. >> No new members added on top of the initial committer list. >> >> Signed-off-by: >> >> [ ](mynewt) Sterling Hughes >> [ ](mynewt) Jim Jagielski >> [ ](mynewt) Justin Mclean >> [ ](mynewt) Greg Stein >> [ ](mynewt) P. Taylor Goetz >> >> Shepherd/Mentor notes: >> >> >> >>> On Nov 3, 2015, at 2:27 PM, Marvin Humphrey <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Aditi, >>> >>> I think what Justin is getting at is that graduation from the >>> Incubator is not related to the maturity of the technology, but rather >>> the maturity of the community. >>> >>> Apache is largely technology-agnostic -- the Foundation, and the Board >>> of Directors acting on the Foundation's behalf when they oversee our >>> projects, do not set technical direction for the projects, beyond >>> requiring that they adhere to various policies. And thus they >>> Incubator PMC, when evaluating whether a podling should graduate from >>> the Incubator and be recommended as a TLP, does not care about >>> project-specific technical milestones. >>> >>> Take a look at this "Apache Project Maturity Model" to see the kinds >>> of things that the are more relevant for graduation: >>> >>> https://community.apache.org/apache-way/apache-project-maturity-model.html >>> >>> The Maturity Model is relatively new, but some podlings have started >>> evaluating their progress against it as a step just prior to >>> graduation, and that seems to be working out well. >>> >>> Marvin Humphrey >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 9:19 AM, aditi hilbert <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> It’s a good point. I wondered about this esp. after the discussion we had >>>> yesterday about next steps. How about: >>>> >>>> “Add configuration subsystem and interface (API) to manage and monitor >>>> embedded devices” >>>> >>>> thanks, >>>> aditi >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Nov 3, 2015, at 3:24 AM, Justin Mclean <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Looks good to me. >>>>> >>>>>> 2. Add support for additional micro controller architectures. >>>>> >>>>> Very minor. It’s a nice to have, but that's not really a requirement for >>>>> graduation. Can we think of something else to replace it? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Justin >>>>> >>>> >> >
