On the release scope, will having the myriad configuration file exist outside the jar (i.e. you can change configuration without rebuilding) be part of the .1 release scope?
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Santosh Marella <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello All, > > I've merged the FGS changes into phase1. Built and tested both coarse > grained scaling and fine grained scaling, UI on a 4 node cluster. > > If anyone finds things are not working as expected, please let me know. > > Thanks, > Santosh > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Santosh Marella <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hello guys, > > > > I propose merging FGS into phase1. As I said before, I think it's at a > > point where the functionality works reasonably well. > > Any future improvements/fixes/UI changes can be done via separate JIRAs. > > > > Unless there are any major concerns, I'd like to merge FGS into phase1 > > *EOD Monday* (PDT). > > > > Thanks, > > Santosh > > > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Santosh Marella <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> I feel FGS is very close to making it into 0.1. PR 116 addresses moving > >> to hadoop 2.7 and making FGS and CGS coexist. This PR was recently > reviewed > >> by Yulia and Darin. Darin had also tried out FGS on hadoop 2.6.x and > 2.7.x > >> clusters and it seemed to have worked as expected. Unless there are more > >> reviews/feedback, it can be merged into issue_14. Once PR 116 is merged > >> into issue_14, issue_14 can be merged into phase1. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Santosh > >> > >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Adam Bordelon <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>> We do have a JIRA 0.1.0 "fix version" field, but none of our issues use > >>> it > >>> yet. > >>> I think the goal was just to take what we have and make it work under > >>> Apache infrastructure, then vote on that for 0.1.0. > >>> Although other features like HA or FGS would be great, let's try to get > >>> our > >>> first Apache release out ASAP. > >>> We can create 0.1.1 or 0.2.0 fix versions for subsequent releases with > >>> other issues/features. Roadmap would be great. > >>> (I'm just summarizing what we discussed a month or two ago. Feel free > to > >>> correct me or disagree with this approach.) > >>> > >>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Swapnil Daingade < > >>> [email protected] > >>> > wrote: > >>> > >>> > Hi all, > >>> > > >>> > Was wondering what would be the scope for the Myriad 0.1 release. > >>> > It would be nice to have a roadmap page somewhere and target > >>> > features to releases (JIRA 'fix version' field perhaps) > >>> > > >>> > Regards > >>> > Swapnil > >>> > > >>> > >> > >> > > >
