Ok, so I tried the remote distribution of the Myriad per the docs, I guess,it could probably use some information related to "how" to run resource manager if it's in the tar.gz. Perhaps an example marathon json. I am playing with it now to figure it out.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 3:48 PM, yuliya Feldman <yufeld...@yahoo.com.invalid > wrote: > mesos/myriad is the right one so far > From: John Omernik <j...@omernik.com> > To: dev@myriad.incubator.apache.org; yuliya Feldman <yufeld...@yahoo.com> > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 1:44 PM > Subject: Re: Myriad 0.1 release scope > > (So if I clone that repo, am I cloning the right one?) > > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 3:43 PM, John Omernik <j...@omernik.com> wrote: > > > Ok, I was going off > > https://github.com/mesos/myriad/blob/phase1/docs/myriad-configuration.md > > > > I will try it. > > > > John > > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 3:40 PM, yuliya Feldman < > > yufeld...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > > > >> You actually do not need to rebuild even today - just keep this file in > >> hadoop config directory that is on the classpath: like .../etc/hadoop > >> From: John Omernik <j...@omernik.com> > >> To: dev@myriad.incubator.apache.org > >> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 1:35 PM > >> Subject: Re: Myriad 0.1 release scope > >> > >> On the release scope, will having the myriad configuration file exist > >> outside the jar (i.e. you can change configuration without rebuilding) > be > >> part of the .1 release scope? > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Santosh Marella < > smare...@maprtech.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Hello All, > >> > > >> > I've merged the FGS changes into phase1. Built and tested both coarse > >> > grained scaling and fine grained scaling, UI on a 4 node cluster. > >> > > >> > If anyone finds things are not working as expected, please let me > know. > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Santosh > >> > > >> > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Santosh Marella < > smare...@maprtech.com > >> > > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hello guys, > >> > > > >> > > I propose merging FGS into phase1. As I said before, I think it's > at a > >> > > point where the functionality works reasonably well. > >> > > Any future improvements/fixes/UI changes can be done via separate > >> JIRAs. > >> > > > >> > > Unless there are any major concerns, I'd like to merge FGS into > phase1 > >> > > *EOD Monday* (PDT). > >> > > > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > Santosh > >> > > > >> > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Santosh Marella < > >> smare...@maprtech.com> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> I feel FGS is very close to making it into 0.1. PR 116 addresses > >> moving > >> > >> to hadoop 2.7 and making FGS and CGS coexist. This PR was recently > >> > reviewed > >> > >> by Yulia and Darin. Darin had also tried out FGS on hadoop 2.6.x > and > >> > 2.7.x > >> > >> clusters and it seemed to have worked as expected. Unless there are > >> more > >> > >> reviews/feedback, it can be merged into issue_14. Once PR 116 is > >> merged > >> > >> into issue_14, issue_14 can be merged into phase1. > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Santosh > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Adam Bordelon <a...@mesosphere.io> > >> > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>> We do have a JIRA 0.1.0 "fix version" field, but none of our > issues > >> use > >> > >>> it > >> > >>> yet. > >> > >>> I think the goal was just to take what we have and make it work > >> under > >> > >>> Apache infrastructure, then vote on that for 0.1.0. > >> > >>> Although other features like HA or FGS would be great, let's try > to > >> get > >> > >>> our > >> > >>> first Apache release out ASAP. > >> > >>> We can create 0.1.1 or 0.2.0 fix versions for subsequent releases > >> with > >> > >>> other issues/features. Roadmap would be great. > >> > >>> (I'm just summarizing what we discussed a month or two ago. Feel > >> free > >> > to > >> > >>> correct me or disagree with this approach.) > >> > >>> > >> > >>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Swapnil Daingade < > >> > >>> swapnil.daing...@gmail.com > >> > >>> > wrote: > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > Hi all, > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > Was wondering what would be the scope for the Myriad 0.1 > release. > >> > >>> > It would be nice to have a roadmap page somewhere and target > >> > >>> > features to releases (JIRA 'fix version' field perhaps) > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > Regards > >> > >>> > Swapnil > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >
