Ok, I was going off https://github.com/mesos/myriad/blob/phase1/docs/myriad-configuration.md
I will try it. John On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 3:40 PM, yuliya Feldman <[email protected] > wrote: > You actually do not need to rebuild even today - just keep this file in > hadoop config directory that is on the classpath: like .../etc/hadoop > From: John Omernik <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 1:35 PM > Subject: Re: Myriad 0.1 release scope > > On the release scope, will having the myriad configuration file exist > outside the jar (i.e. you can change configuration without rebuilding) be > part of the .1 release scope? > > > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Santosh Marella <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > > I've merged the FGS changes into phase1. Built and tested both coarse > > grained scaling and fine grained scaling, UI on a 4 node cluster. > > > > If anyone finds things are not working as expected, please let me know. > > > > Thanks, > > Santosh > > > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Santosh Marella <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hello guys, > > > > > > I propose merging FGS into phase1. As I said before, I think it's at a > > > point where the functionality works reasonably well. > > > Any future improvements/fixes/UI changes can be done via separate > JIRAs. > > > > > > Unless there are any major concerns, I'd like to merge FGS into phase1 > > > *EOD Monday* (PDT). > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Santosh > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Santosh Marella <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> I feel FGS is very close to making it into 0.1. PR 116 addresses > moving > > >> to hadoop 2.7 and making FGS and CGS coexist. This PR was recently > > reviewed > > >> by Yulia and Darin. Darin had also tried out FGS on hadoop 2.6.x and > > 2.7.x > > >> clusters and it seemed to have worked as expected. Unless there are > more > > >> reviews/feedback, it can be merged into issue_14. Once PR 116 is > merged > > >> into issue_14, issue_14 can be merged into phase1. > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Santosh > > >> > > >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Adam Bordelon <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> > > >>> We do have a JIRA 0.1.0 "fix version" field, but none of our issues > use > > >>> it > > >>> yet. > > >>> I think the goal was just to take what we have and make it work under > > >>> Apache infrastructure, then vote on that for 0.1.0. > > >>> Although other features like HA or FGS would be great, let's try to > get > > >>> our > > >>> first Apache release out ASAP. > > >>> We can create 0.1.1 or 0.2.0 fix versions for subsequent releases > with > > >>> other issues/features. Roadmap would be great. > > >>> (I'm just summarizing what we discussed a month or two ago. Feel free > > to > > >>> correct me or disagree with this approach.) > > >>> > > >>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Swapnil Daingade < > > >>> [email protected] > > >>> > wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > Hi all, > > >>> > > > >>> > Was wondering what would be the scope for the Myriad 0.1 release. > > >>> > It would be nice to have a roadmap page somewhere and target > > >>> > features to releases (JIRA 'fix version' field perhaps) > > >>> > > > >>> > Regards > > >>> > Swapnil > > >>> > > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
