On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 19:18, Pavel Jan�k wrote: > From: Daniel Carrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:44:21 -0500 > > > What I said was that the NLC would benefit much from regular IRC > > confs. The NLC has a large number of people, mostly volunteers, who > > have pretty much the same goals, and don't get to talk to each > > much. Hence, regular IRC confs would be an opportunity for different > > NLs to exchange ideas, and to talk more with each other. > > You have described the OOo project here, not NLC... To say the same using > different wording: Your description also applies to OOo, thus again: why > limit to NLC only?
Maybe he's thinking inclusion rather than exclusion? I should think most NLC projects include things of general interest as well as specific to their particular language. Anything that was applicable to all NLC would by definition be applicable to OOo as a whole. If you exclude things of general interest you really say the whole idea is useless and it seems that you then exclude English native speakers from NLC because they don't have a NL project and therefore they only have an interest in OOo. -- Ian Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ZMS Ltd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
