Charles Schulz wrote:
Hello Andre,
yes, you're right. Alexandro, do you focus on QA yourself or does
somebody else (like Richard) do it?
Hello Charles, Alexandro,
The main problem is finding people willing to test all the pieces.
The process isn't very intuitive. Or maybe I just haven't read it
closely enough.
I made an attempt several years ago but lost interest when couldn't drum
up or convince any helpers.
Nor divine what to do other than just declare it stable.
Alexandro, from what I have read, it requires applying all the stated
tests and then declaring it to be stable. Maybe a better approach would
be, "if many are using it and there are no real show-stopper complaints
then it should be moved to stable after about 3 months, Automatically."?
But that hasn't happened. I currently use the stable version, 2.0.3-6
from Debian. Which is very solid.
204rc1 (in Debian and elsewhere) is broken for any serious work --trying
to apply paragraphs styles results in 98% of CPU resources being tied
up. Returning to 203-6 fixes this problem.
The new process of building only rpms is a flawed decision in the eyes
of the Debian world.
Alien works OK but I get more stable results using a build built by
experienced deb builders.
saludos,
Richard.
Best,
Charles.
Andre Schnabel a écrit :
Hi,
Charles Schulz schrieb:
Alexandro,
this is for sure troublesome. Andre, what do you think about this?
well, if someone would answer to issue 69626 and pride the missing
information, we could go on with the process and move the files to the
mirrors.
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69626
André
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
