Dear Reshat, If I remember well, we agreed on tt-crh as being your project's domain name, and we did set up a page there. So for the moment you should work with this project. Do not mix locales and ISO code for the language. I know that Tatar has some very specific issues regarding the naming conventions of its language but, tt-crh was what we agreed on.
Best, Charles. Reshat Sabiq (Reşat) a écrit : > Charles-H. Schulz yazm1_: > > Dear Reshat, > > > How are you doing? Could you provide us with an update on the Tatar > > project and the tt-crh.openoffice.org web site? > > > Thank you, > > > Charles. > > > > I haven't started spending time on this yet, partially due to other > work, and partially because the URL doesn't match what we originally > agreed on. I posted 2 updates (one just now) in the original issue > entry, but i don't have the privileges to re-open the Issue: > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=71995 > > I'd like to make sure this is settled, and then plan on starting the work. > > P.S. I'd also appreciate any feedback if there is new information on > when variant support is expected (single variant in particular, but > would be nice to know whether accommodating RFC 4646 is being considered > as well). Last year there was a rough estimate of 3 years out or so. I'm > not planning on waiting for that to be in place, but would be nice to > keep that in perspective. > > Sincerely, > Re_at. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
