On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Christian Lenz wrote: When I have a look in my tickets, there are a lot of tickets, where no one > is working on. Sure there is a person who is responsible for it but I have > a lot of tickets where there is no single communication at all. So those > tickets seems dead but they arn't. Most of the time those tickets are > feature requests. That should be handled by jira too and not gettings lost.
Definitely yes. Gj On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Christian Lenz <[email protected]> wrote: > When I have a look in my tickets, there are a lot of tickets, where no one > is working on. Sure there is a person who is responsible for it but I have > a lot of tickets where there is no single communication at all. So those > tickets seems dead but they arn't. Most of the time those tickets are > feature requests. That should be handled by jira too and not gettings lost. > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 14. Mai 2017 um 11:12 Uhr > > Von: "Jiří Kovalský" <[email protected]> > > An: [email protected] > > Betreff: Re: Products/Components structure for JIRA > > > > I believe that those which will be worked on by somebody will be > > manually duplicated in JIRA a linked back to original Bugzilla issue. > > > > -Jirka > > > > Dne 13.5.2017 v 11:47 Cezariusz Marek napsal(a): > > > > > What about open issues? How are you going to track them if you won't > migrate them? > > > > -- > > Cezariusz Marek > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jiří Kovalský [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2017 11:39 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: Sean Carrick <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: Products/Components structure for JIRA > > > > I don't think we should have component for every plugin and as for > > CakePHP there are only 18 CakePHP specific bugs in Bugzilla. The last > > one #256685 [1] was resolved in November 2015. > > > > [1] > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__ > netbeans.org_bugzilla_show-5Fbug.cgi-3Fid-3D256685&d=DwIFaQ&c= > RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PQcxBKCX5YTpkKY057SbK10&r= > lNbsjsPBIlkvLk3cCo-v9Cl8OCHz_BBqfpuXTKAlzb4&m= > EUQOw7cbL6aSw6jsTvlkOLwKoHt0qQwyP9cozE3PK7o&s=Bl57Fy4-rph- > 9F87uSknVK7mQf_i_sp3SlrN5-nEO6E&e= > > > > > > And for the record I am against migrating any bugs from Bugzilla to > > JIRA. We will just switch Bugzilla to read-only mode and start filing > > bugs to JIRA from issue #0 after donation is complete. > > > > -Jirka > > > > Dne 13.5.2017 v 01:40 Geertjan Wielenga napsal(a): > > > If CakePHP isn't listed specifically in the current Bugzilla then it > > > won't be in the reduced list either. And Bugzilla has never had a > > > component for each plugin. > > > > > > The point is to try and maintain a list of products/components as > > > close to what there currently is, so that we can transfer issues over > > > from the Oracle NetBeans bugtracker to the Apache NetBeans bugtracker. > > > > > > I strongly recommend we don't start thinking up new > > > products/components until we have a stable situation, i.e., until we > > > have (1) set up the reduced list as categories in Apache NetBeans > > > bugtracker and (2) moved the issues from the Oracle bugtracker to the > Apache bugtracker. > > > > > > Gj > > > > > > On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Sean Carrick <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > >> Emi, > > >> > > >> That's what I was wondering...I couldn't remember if CakePHP was in > > >> the Bugzilla system or not, but could have sworn I'd seen plugins for > > >> CakePHP in NB... > > >> > > >> Sean Carrick > > >> VP Information Systems > > >> Integrity Solutions > > >> > > >> On Sat, 2017-05-13 at 02:09 +0300, Emilian Bold wrote: > > >> This is a "reduced list". I don't see CakePHP in the current Bugzilla > > >> either. I assume it falls under PHP? > > >> > > >> > > >> --emi > > >> > > >> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 2:04 AM, Sean Carrick <[email protected] > > >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > >> Jiri, > > >> > > >> Looking through that list, I didn't see the CakePHP framework on the > > >> list. Isn't CakePHP currently supported within NetBeans and shouldn't > > >> there be a bug reporting combination on JIRA? > > >> > > >> Sean Carrick > > >> VP Information Systems > > >> Integrity Solutions > > >> > > >> On Fri, 2017-05-12 at 19:45 +0200, Jiří Kovalský wrote: > > >>> Hello NetBeans Apache Incubator community, > > >>> > > >>> in order to be prepared for switching NetBeans bug tracking from > > >>> Bugzilla to JIRA we need to have appropriate products and categories > > >>> created in JIRA. > > >>> > > >>> At the moment there are almost 600 combinations of products and > > >>> components in the NetBeans Bugzilla but plenty of them are no longer > > >>> used and are obsolete. That's why we have prepared a reduced list of > > >>> these with ~230 combinations which we consider valid. It is based on > > >>> the following criteria: the product/component was used in the past 6 > > >>> months and has at least 10 opened bugs. We also removed Oracle > > >>> hosting specific products like installers, qa, www etc. however any > > >>> of these can be re-added in the future if needed of course. > > >>> > > >>> Please review the list and comment if you have a strong opinion. > > >>> > > >>> Since NetCAT 9.0 program is scheduled to start in early June please > > >>> don't hesitate long with your feedback. > > >>> > > >>> And finally, who has the knowledge/access to JIRA to create these > > >>> products/components there? > > >>> > > >>> Thanks and enjoy your weekends! > > >>> > > >>> -Jirka > > >
