Thanks a lot for this info.

Gj

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 12:10 AM, John McDonnell <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Jiri,
>
> A JIRA project exists for Netbeans: https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/NETBEANS <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS>
>
> But I don’t believe the products/components have been migrated over, as
> theres no components to select when I attempt to create a ticket.
>
>
> Also looking at [1], it seems when migrating over from Bugzilla to JIRA,
> the concept of Bugzilla products is the same as JIRA’s project, and then
> component = component.  What might be a limiting factor is the JIRA project
> is NETBEANS, so we can’t seemingly just create new projects in JIRA as they
> map to Apache projects as well.
>
> I assume you’d want to map each pairing as a component in JIRA, i.e. from
> your original attachment:
> 'apisupport - API Docs'
> 'apisupport - Harness'
> 'apisupport - Maven'
> 'apisupport - Project'
> 'cnd - Accessibility'
> etc…
>
> Does this make sense?
>
> Also I don’t have access to create components, but if needed I could find
> the time to help someone out how can...
>
>
> [1]: https://confluence.atlassian.com/adminjiraserver073/
> importing-data-from-bugzilla-861253706.html#ImportingdatafromBugzilla-
> jirafieldtipsTipsforimportingBugzilladataintoJIRAfields <
> https://confluence.atlassian.com/adminjiraserver073/
> importing-data-from-bugzilla-861253706.html#ImportingdatafromBugzilla-
> jirafieldtipsTipsforimportingBugzilladataintoJIRAfields>
>
> Regards
>
> John
>
>
>
> > On 7 Jun 2017, at 22:30, Jiří Kovalský <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Any update on this?
> >
> > Have JIRA been created for NetBeans already and products/components
> setup?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Jirka
> >
> > Dne 16.5.2017 v 10:28 Jiří Kovalský napsal(a):
> >> Dne 15.5.2017 v 10:42 Geertjan Wielenga napsal(a):
> >>> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Christian Lenz wrote:
> >>>
> >>> When I have a look in my tickets, there are a lot of tickets, where no
> one
> >>>> is working on. Sure there is a person who is responsible for it but I
> have
> >>>> a lot of tickets where there is no single communication at all. So
> those
> >>>> tickets seems dead but they arn't. Most of the time those tickets are
> >>>> feature requests. That should be handled by jira too and not gettings
> lost.
> >>>
> >>> Definitely yes.
> >> I also agree that it would be better if some volunteers take it over
> and migrate those Bugzilla bugs/enhancements that will have corresponding
> products/components in JIRA.
> >> -Jirka
> >>> Gj
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Christian Lenz <
> [email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> When I have a look in my tickets, there are a lot of tickets, where
> no one
> >>>> is working on. Sure there is a person who is responsible for it but I
> have
> >>>> a lot of tickets where there is no single communication at all. So
> those
> >>>> tickets seems dead but they arn't. Most of the time those tickets are
> >>>> feature requests. That should be handled by jira too and not gettings
> lost.
> >>>>
> >>>>> Gesendet: Sonntag, 14. Mai 2017 um 11:12 Uhr
> >>>>> Von: "Jiří Kovalský" <[email protected]>
> >>>>> An: [email protected]
> >>>>> Betreff: Re: Products/Components structure for JIRA
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I believe that those which will be worked on by somebody will be
> >>>>> manually duplicated in JIRA a linked back to original Bugzilla issue.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Jirka
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dne 13.5.2017 v 11:47 Cezariusz Marek napsal(a):
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> What about open issues? How are you going to track them if you won't
> >>>> migrate them?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Cezariusz Marek
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>> From: Jiří Kovalský [mailto:[email protected]]
> >>>>> Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2017 11:39 AM
> >>>>> To: [email protected]
> >>>>> Cc: Sean Carrick <[email protected]>
> >>>>> Subject: Re: Products/Components structure for JIRA
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I don't think we should have component for every plugin and as for
> >>>>> CakePHP there are only 18 CakePHP specific bugs in Bugzilla. The last
> >>>>> one #256685 [1] was resolved in November 2015.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1]
> >>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__
> >>>> netbeans.org_bugzilla_show-5Fbug.cgi-3Fid-3D256685&d=DwIFaQ&c=
> >>>> RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PQcxBKCX5YTpkKY057SbK10&r=
> >>>> lNbsjsPBIlkvLk3cCo-v9Cl8OCHz_BBqfpuXTKAlzb4&m=
> >>>> EUQOw7cbL6aSw6jsTvlkOLwKoHt0qQwyP9cozE3PK7o&s=Bl57Fy4-rph-
> >>>> 9F87uSknVK7mQf_i_sp3SlrN5-nEO6E&e=
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> And for the record I am against migrating any bugs from Bugzilla to
> >>>>> JIRA. We will just switch Bugzilla to read-only mode and start filing
> >>>>> bugs to JIRA from issue #0 after donation is complete.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Jirka
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dne 13.5.2017 v 01:40 Geertjan Wielenga napsal(a):
> >>>>>> If CakePHP isn't listed specifically in the current Bugzilla then it
> >>>>>> won't be in the reduced list either. And Bugzilla has never had a
> >>>>>> component for each plugin.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The point is to try and maintain a list of products/components as
> >>>>>> close to what there currently is, so that we can transfer issues
> over
> >>>>>> from the Oracle NetBeans bugtracker to the Apache NetBeans
> bugtracker.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I strongly recommend we don't start thinking up new
> >>>>>> products/components until we have a stable situation, i.e., until we
> >>>>>> have (1) set up the reduced list as categories in Apache NetBeans
> >>>>>> bugtracker and (2) moved the issues from the Oracle bugtracker to
> the
> >>>> Apache bugtracker.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Gj
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Sean Carrick <
> [email protected]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Emi,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> That's what I was wondering...I couldn't remember if CakePHP was in
> >>>>>>> the Bugzilla system or not, but could have sworn I'd seen plugins
> for
> >>>>>>> CakePHP in NB...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Sean Carrick
> >>>>>>> VP Information Systems
> >>>>>>> Integrity Solutions
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Sat, 2017-05-13 at 02:09 +0300, Emilian Bold wrote:
> >>>>>>> This is a "reduced list". I don't see CakePHP in the current
> Bugzilla
> >>>>>>> either. I assume it falls under PHP?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --emi
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 2:04 AM, Sean Carrick <
> [email protected]
> >>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> Jiri,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Looking through that list, I didn't see the CakePHP framework on
> the
> >>>>>>> list. Isn't CakePHP currently supported within NetBeans and
> shouldn't
> >>>>>>> there be a bug reporting combination on JIRA?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Sean Carrick
> >>>>>>> VP Information Systems
> >>>>>>> Integrity Solutions
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Fri, 2017-05-12 at 19:45 +0200, Jiří Kovalský wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Hello NetBeans Apache Incubator community,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>    in order to be prepared for switching NetBeans bug tracking
> from
> >>>>>>>> Bugzilla to JIRA we need to have appropriate products and
> categories
> >>>>>>>> created in JIRA.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>    At the moment there are almost 600 combinations of products and
> >>>>>>>> components in the NetBeans Bugzilla but plenty of them are no
> longer
> >>>>>>>> used and are obsolete. That's why we have prepared a reduced list
> of
> >>>>>>>> these with ~230 combinations which we consider valid. It is based
> on
> >>>>>>>> the following criteria: the product/component was used in the
> past 6
> >>>>>>>> months and has at least 10 opened bugs. We also removed Oracle
> >>>>>>>> hosting specific products like installers, qa, www etc. however
> any
> >>>>>>>> of these can be re-added in the future if needed of course.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Please review the list and comment if you have a strong opinion.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Since NetCAT 9.0 program is scheduled to start in early June
> please
> >>>>>>>> don't hesitate long with your feedback.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> And finally, who has the knowledge/access to JIRA to create these
> >>>>>>>> products/components there?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks and enjoy your weekends!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -Jirka
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
>
>

Reply via email to