OK. But, is there anything wrong with this location instead:

http://bits.netbeans.org/download/apache-donation/

I.e., does it have to be github.com/oracle/netbeans? If the above is listed
in Schedule B, is that OK?

Thanks,

Geertjan


On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 1:00 AM, Craig Russell <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Geertjan,
>
> With three separate code donations, probably three separate CCLAs.
>
> 1. Upload the code to a public repository. How about
> github.org/oracle/netbeans? Create a directory called drop1 or something
> meaningful. Make the repository read-only so no one thinks it's "live".
>
> 2. Create a CCLA with list of people and list https://github.org/oracle/
> netbeans/drop1 in Schedule B.
>
> 3. Sign, scan, and send the CCLA to [email protected].
>
> 4. Secretary will ack and copy the incubator and netbeans private email
> lists.
>
> 5. You announce on this list that the donation is complete and list
> https://github.org/oracle/netbeans/drop1 as the first code drop. Everyone
> can look at the code and you can import the code into the apache netbeans
> repository.
>
> 6. If the license header is the standard Oracle copyright/GPL, it will
> need to be changed for all the relevant files. You can change the license
> headers in github, or as you import the code into Apache, or immediately
> after import. The important thing is that changing the license headers is
> transparent (visible to the public).
>
> 7. When drop2 is ready, repeat from step 1.
>
> Regards,
>
> Craig
>
> > On Jun 13, 2017, at 3:20 PM, Geertjan Wielenga <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Craig,
> >
> > In the case of NetBeans, we'll be doing three separate code donations,
> > i.e., three separate CCLAs. Each CCLA will come with its own ZIP.
> >
> > There'd be a time difference of some months between them.
> >
> > So, the sequence would be, (1) send the CCLA to [email protected] and then
> (2)
> > wait? for response from [email protected].? Or what, exactly? and then (3)
> put
> > the ZIP referred to in the CCLA in GitHub, where, which one exactly?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Geertjan
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Craig Russell <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Geertjan,
> >>
> >> There are three kinds of contribution agreements. The individual one,
> >> ICLA, is required for all committers. You are all familiar with this
> one.
> >>
> >> The second is a software grant. This is specifically to grant rights to
> >> the code to Apache from the owner, which might be a corporation or an
> >> individual.
> >>
> >> The third is a combination software grant and contributor enumeration,
> >> called CCLA. It contains a grant and lists people from the corporation
> who
> >> are specifically authorized to contribute code that is owned by the
> >> corporation, including but not limited to the grant.
> >>
> >> Any of these documents should be scanned and sent to
> [email protected].
> >>
> >> The grant/ccla specifies the code/documentation/images to be
> contributed.
> >> Usually the code is already in a public repository and the grant simply
> >> provides the url to the code being granted. Can the ZIP file be
> uploaded to
> >> a donor-owned repository like github? This approach makes it extremely
> easy
> >> to trace what happens to the code as it is imported into an Apache
> >> repository.
> >>
> >> A separate agreement is usually executed to donate trademarks. That
> >> discussion should be directed to [email protected] .
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Craig
> >>
> >>> On Jun 13, 2017, at 2:58 PM, Geertjan Wielenga <
> >> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi all, especially our mentors, and others with Apache experience,
> >>>
> >>> How does Apache prefer to receive donations?
> >>>
> >>> Say hypothetically a donating organization has a ZIP file containing
> the
> >>> source code to be donated, and a grant document, and now the donating
> >>> organization is thinking exactly what to do with the ZIP file and grant
> >>> document -- can someone advise the precise next steps, with variations,
> >> and
> >>> their sequence?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Geertjan
> >>
> >> Craig L Russell
> >> Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
> >> [email protected] http://db.apache.org/jdo
> >>
> >>
>
> Craig L Russell
> Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
> [email protected] http://db.apache.org/jdo
>
>

Reply via email to