Why don't we build a version with nb-javac in it and distribute it ? If we don't distribute it under the ASF but outside then it is ok right ?
---------- Emmanuel Hugonnet http://www.ehsavoie.com http://twitter.com/ehsavoie On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:44 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > What we want, is not so relevant, unfortunately. And asking anyone anything > is a question of months, which we don’t have. Wider needs, great, let’s > work on those. > > In the meantime, what’s the best approach? Maybe putting these two nb-javac > JARs on bitbucket and explicitly informing the user during installation via > the installer wizard for agreement on their being downloaded and placed in > the correct locations locally? > > Gj > > On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 at 19:36, Neil C Smith <neilcsm...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, 14 Nov 2017, 18:54 Jan Lahoda, <lah...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Another aspect is from where to download the library: I assume we would > > > need a reasonably stable place to which we could point the users. > > > > > > Are there any opinions on this? > > > > > > > As before when this came up, as well as where it's downloaded from, I'd > be > > interested to know how it's going to be maintained there? It feels hard > to > > answer one question without the other? > > > > I also still wonder whether there's been further thought on asking the > > OpenJDK project to host it (as ide-javac)? The last time I suggested that > > there was a feeling that it was too NetBeans specific, and other projects > > were moving to things like Language Server Protocol. Just for the record > > (as I mentioned to Jaroslav a while back) of the two LSP plugins for > Java, > > one is Eclipse based, and the other is using nb-javac. There is > obviously a > > wider need for the features it brings! > > > > Best wishes, > > > > Neil > > > > > -- > > Neil C Smith > > Artist & Technologist > > www.neilcsmith.net > > > > Praxis LIVE - hybrid visual IDE for creative coding - www.praxislive.org > > >
