Many thanks Bertrand. The vote result thread is here (just as I finished working on it, your +1 arrived, great timing!):
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/278b3bd85eaeec8718dee95f9b2b2c2c7656544fb5b504f6b8e2632c@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E Thanks, Gj On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:01 PM, Geertjan Wielenga > <[email protected]> wrote: > > ...Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)... > > +1 on the release of this archive: > > SHA1(incubating-netbeans-platform-9.0-alpha-source.zip)= > 1189b293cecfd5236cf18df2c2bd0f6b414dab75 > which is found under > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/netbeans/ > incubating-netbeans-platform/incubating-9.0-alpha/ > > Signature is ok using the key found in > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/netbeans/KEYS > > Digests are ok > > LICENSE NOTICE DISCLAIMER look good to me. > > In my opinion, DEPENDENCIES does not provide enoughj information as to > why some GPL dependencies are considered compile time only. I > understand https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/278 will > improve that, so not a blocker for this release. > > The 9.0-alpha-rc2 Git tag has been added as well, that's good and > please add that to the netbeans release process documentation - a Git > tag is required to allow people to verify that the release matches a > specific state of the Git repository. > > The <patternset id="non.rat"> in nbbuild/build.xml defines a LOT of > rat exclusions, I think they are ok at this point but it would be good > to streamline that if possible and maybe move to a separate file for > clarity. > > I have not reviewed the convenience binaries, just the Apache source > release. > > -Bertrand >
