I think producing them now or ASAP would be best. They’ll be the same as
rc1, except no JARs and ZIPs.

Gj

On Sunday, January 14, 2018, Jan Lahoda <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 4:33 PM, Geertjan Wielenga <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I have notes from Jan Lahoda for producing a release candidate:
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/
> > Apache+NetBeans+Release+README
> >
> > See the steps in 'Producing a Release Candidate' above, these are all
> > his notes, very practical and step by step.
> >
> > I'm hoping he'll produce the 9.0 Beta rc2 release candidate -- and
> >
>
> So, should I produce the zips now, or do we want to do something more? The
> zips would be mostly like the zips here:
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-release/173/artifact/dist/
>
> So it is possible to check what would be the release.
>
> Jan
>
>
> > after that, i.e., for subsequent releases, others (e.g., me or anyone
> > else) should take over the task of putting the release candidate
> > together, so that multiple people have experience doing this and so
> > that we're not dependent on one person having the relevant knowledge
> > for this task.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Gj
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 3:04 PM, Neil C Smith <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >> Hi Geertjan,
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 at 23:14 Geertjan Wielenga <
> > >> [email protected]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll
> > >>> see Apache NetBeans:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/netbeans/
> > incubating-netbeans-java/incubating-9.0-beta/
> incubating-netbeans-java-9.0-
> > beta-bin.zip
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >> As I was just re-reading the release policy I wondered whether we
> > should be
> > >> providing a convenience binary in a vote?  Or at least caveating it
> that
> > >> you shouldn't (binding) vote based on it?
> > >
> > >
> > > That's exactly what we're doing already. See the start of this thread
> > > -- if you like we can add that caveat even more clearly. I.e., the
> > > artifact that the vote is about is the source artifact and the
> > > convenience binary is only there as a convenience.
> > >
> > > Gj
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to