Very nice, thanks very much. Gj
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Jan Lahoda <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok. The release files for platform are here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/netbeans/incubating-netbeans-platform/incubating-9.0-beta-rc2/ > and for the Java IDE are here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/netbeans/incubating-netbeans-java/incubating-9.0-beta-rc2/ > > Git tag is '9.0-beta-rc2'. > > Please let me know if there are any problems. > > Jan > > > On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 8:45 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I think producing them now or ASAP would be best. They’ll be the same as >> rc1, except no JARs and ZIPs. >> >> Gj >> >> On Sunday, January 14, 2018, Jan Lahoda <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 4:33 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > I have notes from Jan Lahoda for producing a release candidate: >> > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/ >> > > Apache+NetBeans+Release+README >> > > >> > > See the steps in 'Producing a Release Candidate' above, these are all >> > > his notes, very practical and step by step. >> > > >> > > I'm hoping he'll produce the 9.0 Beta rc2 release candidate -- and >> > > >> > >> > So, should I produce the zips now, or do we want to do something more? >> The >> > zips would be mostly like the zips here: >> > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/ >> > incubator-netbeans-release/173/artifact/dist/ >> > >> > So it is possible to check what would be the release. >> > >> > Jan >> > >> > >> > > after that, i.e., for subsequent releases, others (e.g., me or anyone >> > > else) should take over the task of putting the release candidate >> > > together, so that multiple people have experience doing this and so >> > > that we're not dependent on one person having the relevant knowledge >> > > for this task. >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > >> > > Gj >> > > >> > > On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Geertjan Wielenga >> > > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 3:04 PM, Neil C Smith <[email protected] >> > >> > > wrote: >> > > >> Hi Geertjan, >> > > >> >> > > >> On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 at 23:14 Geertjan Wielenga < >> > > >> [email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >>> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and >> you'll >> > > >>> see Apache NetBeans: >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/netbeans/ >> > > incubating-netbeans-java/incubating-9.0-beta/ >> > incubating-netbeans-java-9.0- >> > > beta-bin.zip >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >> As I was just re-reading the release policy I wondered whether we >> > > should be >> > > >> providing a convenience binary in a vote? Or at least caveating it >> > that >> > > >> you shouldn't (binding) vote based on it? >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > That's exactly what we're doing already. See the start of this thread >> > > > -- if you like we can add that caveat even more clearly. I.e., the >> > > > artifact that the vote is about is the source artifact and the >> > > > convenience binary is only there as a convenience. >> > > > >> > > > Gj >> > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]. >> apache.org >> > > >> > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
