On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 at 10:07 Antonio <[email protected]> wrote: > We could reuse the colors in the logo to colorize a little bit the > website. Links and headers are the same color, and that is confusing, I > think. >
Well, I'm a -1 to using that coloured logo right now, because the only measure we currently have of community input shows clear preference for the blue one. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetBeans+Logo Now, if that vote happens to change in the near future ... ;-) On the links / header issue I agree though. And we also have an issue with links in asciidoc TOCs - I had to fix a few in my PR because they resulted in broken output. In fact, I noticed the broken output because the link and header colours seemed to be _slightly_ different? I'd be tempted to remove links from headers in most places as well as looking at an alternative header colour. If we end up sticking with the blue logo then an alternative source of secondary colour would be the hero image, or we just make headers match the standard text colour and look at an alternative way to make them stand out (eg. different header font). > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENWHISK/Compliance+Checklist+for+OpenWhisk.org+website > > I think we comply with most of the points there, so we should be ready > to merge to master by monday. > Really useful link, and yes agree with you on that assessment. I notice no tick against roadmap on their list - that's something I'd like to see us work on sometime soon! Best wishes, Neil -- Neil C Smith Artist & Technologist www.neilcsmith.net Praxis LIVE - hybrid visual IDE for creative coding - www.praxislive.org
