Then something has changed because I have heard Mark Reinhold say multiple
times that Jigsaw is not intended to be like OSGi etc because runtime
updates are not intended to be supported.

Gj



On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 at 09:32, Miguel Cardoso Martins <
miguelcardosomart...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> The Java module system does permit adding/removing (root) modules, and thus
> modifying the module graph at runtime.
> This is done through the layer API of the JPMS.
> A layer would needed to be created (by netbeans under the hood) for each
> module (and possible dependencies) at the time it is requested to be added
> to netbeans.
>
> I for once think that moving longterm to the new java module system would
> be great to modernise netbeans
>
> Regards
> M
>
>
> Am Sa., 14. Juli 2018 um 08:40 Uhr schrieb Geertjan Wielenga
> <geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com.invalid>:
>
> > Jigsaw does not permit updates at runtime. So if we were to use Jigsaw,
> > that would be the end of being able to install plugins into Apache
> NetBeans
> > while it is running.
> >
> > Gj
> >
> > On Saturday, July 14, 2018, Laszlo Kishalmi <laszlo.kisha...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Well this question is to Jaroslav Tulach mostly.
> > >
> > > From Java 9 there are three modularization system in Java. OSGI,
> NetBeans
> > > and Java's JigSaw.
> > >
> > > My question is could NetBeans be ported on JigSaw? What would we gain
> > form
> > > that movement (if any), and what would be the pain points.
> > >
> > > I'd even would like to see a deep analysis on this topic on Jarda's
> blog.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thank you in advance!
> > >
> > > Laszlo Kishalmi
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to