Ah, thanks for the explanation! -- Eirik On 7/14/18, 1:27 PM, "Jan Lahoda" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 1:00 PM, Eirik Bakke <[email protected]> wrote: > >> One of the great things about the NetBeans module system is that adding >>a >> dependency on module X does _not_ permit you to use classes from X's own >> dependencies (transitive dependencies). >> > >In Jigsaw, module X can for each of its dependencies decide if it should >be >transitive or not. If it says "requires foo", that users of "X" won't be >able to use stuff from "foo" without explicit dependency on "foo", if it >says "requires transitive foo;" then users of "X" will be able to use >stuff >"foo" without explicitly depending on "foo". > >Jan > > >> >> Is this also the case with Jigsaw? >> >> -- Eirik >> >> On 7/14/18, 1:35 AM, "Laszlo Kishalmi" >><[email protected]<mailto: >> [email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Well this question is to Jaroslav Tulach mostly. >> >> From Java 9 there are three modularization system in Java. OSGI, >> NetBeans and Java's JigSaw. >> >> My question is could NetBeans be ported on JigSaw? What would we gain >> form that movement (if any), and what would be the pain points. >> >> I'd even would like to see a deep analysis on this topic on Jarda's >>blog. >> >> >> Thank you in advance! >> >> Laszlo Kishalmi >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> >> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
