GlassFish 5+ is not currently supported under JDK 9+...that is in the
works.  I believe the target JDK is for Java SE 11 support.

See this issue in the tracker:
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/glassfish/issues/22130

Therefore, GlassFish 5 requires JDK 8.


On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 7:59 AM Geertjan Wielenga
<geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote:

> So, not specifically JDK 8, but greater than JDK 8, too? I.e., the modular
> JDK, from JDK 9 onwards, is supported by GlassFish?
>
> And what does GlassFish need the JDK for?
>
> Gj
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 2:57 PM Josh Juneau <juneau...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Geertjan,
> >
> > Java EE 8 requires JDK8+, and therefore GlassFish 5/5.1 require JDK 8+.
> >
> > Hope this helps.  Thanks
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 7:52 AM Geertjan Wielenga
> > <geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > There's quite some functionality in NetBeans related to Java/Jakarta EE
> > > that assumes that the project is making use of JDK 8.
> > >
> > > In particular, this results in these problems:
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2170
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2126
> > >
> > > So, the question is, which if any specific version of the JDK does the
> > > latest GlassFish releases require?
> > >
> > > If GlassFish requires JDK 8, then NetBeans is right and users should
> > simply
> > > be told to use JDK 8 with GlassFish. If not, then we need to change
> > > something in NetBeans to enable GlassFish to work with later JDKs.
> > >
> > > I'm assuming some tools or files in the JDK are needed by GlassFish or,
> > at
> > > least, are needed by GlassFish when run with/from NetBeans.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Gj
> > >
> > --
> > Josh Juneau
> > juneau...@gmail.com
> > http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
> > https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
> >
>
-- 
Josh Juneau
juneau...@gmail.com
http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866

Reply via email to