Since it is not a requirement for Apache ("Test data for which the addition
of a source header would cause the tests to fail"), it should not be a
requirement for Apache NetBeans. Indeed, let's at the very least waive this
for 11.Gj On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 11:50 AM Matthias Bläsing <mblaes...@doppel-helix.eu> wrote: > Hi, > > Am Samstag, den 09.03.2019, 08:44 +0100 schrieb Jan Lahoda: > > > NETBEANS-2126 Ant Web Application project - missing reference > > > javaee-endorsed-api-7.0 > > > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2126) > > > > > > I do not know how much this counts as a blocker, I hope there is an > easy > > > way to fix it. > > > > > > > Seems Matthias is looking at this. > > Correct, Laszlo already marked it as 11.0-vc3, so the backport should > have happened. > > > > > > NETBEANS-1819 Incorrect License Headers in Test Sources > > > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-1819) > > > > > > The NETBEANS-1819 could be an easy pick for anyone to take just > requires > > > insert header into test files and make sure that the test still works > > > with the header. > > > > > > > Frankly, I think this may be the most laborious part. Inserting the > license > > headers will almost surely trigger changes in the tests (but even if it > did > > not, it will be necessary to *run* the tests and evaluate). Of course, > > someone can imagine some trick to do this without breaking all the tests, > > but still does not feel so easy. > > > > Frankly, I wonder why we are expected to do something like that, given: > > http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-exceptions > > > > > Test data for which the addition of a source header would cause the > tests > > to fail. > > > It was our decision to treat license related issues as blockers. If > possible we should see, that also the test sources contain correct > license headers. It would be great if the unittests for java.editor > could be fixed, then the addition of license headers to the data files > is a chore, but doable. > > This would be great if some people with deeper knowledge of the java > support could look into this. I gladly take over, after the unittests > work. > > If we can do it before 11, great, if not, I would consider this issue > as waivable for 11. > > Greetings > > Matthias > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > >
