That was my intuition as well. On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Aldrin Piri <[email protected]> wrote:
> Under the scope of it being a bug or being an improvement depending on > perspective, I would say it should be included as it is low risk and > certainly provides functionality that corrects/enhances expected > transformation. > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Tony Kurc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > So where do tickets like NIFI-1234 belong? A bug with a ready patch? > > > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Sorry it was late :-) > > > > > > I simply mean the RC is totally available to be kicked out. But I'd > > > like to see folks test the master a bit more before then. We just got > > > all the tickets closed so I'd like to see us slow it a bit to ensure > > > folks are really able to spend good time testing. > > > > > > Thanks > > > Joe > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > "Before I kick out Apache NiFi 0.4.0 RC1 I propose we spend a day or > so > > > > doing the same sort of items we would have and if it is quiet-ish > then > > > > we proceed with putting out an RC. " > > > > > > > > we would have if what? > > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Team, > > > >> > > > >> As you can see here [1] we are 'done' as far as 0.4.0 known tickets > > > >> go. I am ready to create the RC and would love to do so. > > > >> > > > >> Before I kick out Apache NiFi 0.4.0 RC1 I propose we spend a day or > so > > > >> doing the same sort of items we would have and if it is quiet-ish > then > > > >> we proceed with putting out an RC. There are a tremendous amount of > > > >> tickets/items involved in this release [2] with a few that are > rather > > > >> substantive changes/features such as [3] for example. > > > >> > > > >> [1] > > > >> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1237?jql=project%20%3D%20NIFI%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.4.0%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC > > > >> > > > >> [2] > > > >> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1122?jql=project%20%3D%20NIFI%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.4.0%20ORDER%20BY%20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC > > > >> > > > >> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-655 > > > >> > > > >> Thanks > > > >> Joe > > > >> > > > >> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Tony Kurc <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> > FWIW I submitted at patch for lineendings that I don't believe > will > > > >> > conflict with NIFI-655 > > > >> > On Nov 20, 2015 8:57 AM, "Joe Witt" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> >> Getting closer! > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1122?jql=project%20%3D%20NIFI%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.4.0%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Key stuff left: > > > >> >> - Wrap up NIFI-655 uname/pword stuff > > > >> >> - Make the kafka client config a little more flexible > > > >> >> - Make the user experience better for processors requiring input > > > >> >> - Fix up the tail file stuff which we all now appreciate as being > > > >> >> extraordinarily edge case challenged > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Then > > > >> >> - Tony fixes line endings (except for tests which require > specific > > > >> endings) > > > >> >> - I will do RM to kick out RC > > > >> >> - We all do focused testing > > > >> >> - We do the vote > > > >> >> > > > >> >> We're a little behind the ideal timeline but these are definitely > > > >> >> things worth waiting for and we're still finding bugs during > > testing. > > > >> >> Once the popcorn stops popping as much (so to speak) we can zero > in > > > on > > > >> >> a release. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Thanks > > > >> >> Joe > > > >> >> > > > >> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Joe Percivall > > > >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> >> > Per NiFi-1165: a discussion is occurring on the ticket: > > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1165 > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > Overall, most of the issues are identified and pending a fix > from > > > >> Mark, > > > >> >> Oleg and I. The issues were encountered on two different windows > 8 > > > >> machines > > > >> >> by me and on windows 2012 R2 by Mark. My configuration is maven > > 3.3.3 > > > >> and > > > >> >> Java 1.8.0_45 (on the machine I have in front of me). > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > Should have a patch resolving the issues in the next couple > days. > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > Joe > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > - - - - - - Joseph Percivall > > > >> >> > linkedin.com/in/Percivall > > > >> >> > e: [email protected] > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > On Monday, November 16, 2015 10:42 AM, Sean Busbey < > > > >> [email protected]> > > > >> >> wrote: > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > re: NIFI-1165 I also have a windows 7 laptop I can test on. > > (though > > > >> it is > > > >> >> > low power) > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Aldrin Piri < > > > [email protected]> > > > >> >> wrote: > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> >> I have another set of eyes for NIFI-748. Will do so now. > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Tony Kurc <[email protected] > > > > > >> wrote: > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > For those not watching commits@nifi > > > >> >> >> > I need another set of eyes on the review for NIFI-748 > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Joe Witt < > [email protected] > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > NIFI-1082 (this should move to next release unless a > > > resolution > > > >> is > > > >> >> >> > > imminent) > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > NIFI-1108 (move to next release) > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > NIFI-1139 (recommend moving to 0.5.0) > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > NIFI-1164 (this should get fixed now - it makes builds > > > >> unreliable) > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > NIFI-1165 (should tackle now. have a windows laptop i can > > > build > > > >> on) > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > Thanks for pushing tony. > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Tony Kurc < > > [email protected]> > > > >> >> wrote: > > > >> >> >> > > > Update: > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > Presumably fixed by NIFI-1086 (Joe Percivall). Reviewed, > > > >> awaiting > > > >> >> >> > > revision > > > >> >> >> > > > NIFI-61 > > > >> >> >> > > > NIFI-812 > > > >> >> >> > > > NIFI-980 > > > >> >> >> > > > NIFI-1009 > > > >> >> >> > > > NIFI-1086 > > > >> >> >> > > > NIFI-1133 > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > Multiple Auths (Matt Gilman) no patch yet, making > progress > > > >> >> >> > > > NIFI-655 > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > Provenance Search Improvement (Oleg Zhurakousky) PR in, > > > being > > > >> >> >> reviewed > > > >> >> >> > by > > > >> >> >> > > > Tony Kurc > > > >> >> >> > > > NIFI-748 > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > Create a Getting Started Guide (Mark Payne) Review > > complete, > > > >> being > > > >> >> >> > merged > > > >> >> >> > > > in by Tony Kurc > > > >> >> >> > > > NIFI-973 > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > Line ending fix (Tony Kurc) Finger hovering over "go" > > button > > > >> >> >> > > > NIFI-1054 > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > ExecuteStreamCommand (Joe Percivall). Reviewed, awaiting > > > >> revision > > > >> >> >> > > > NIFI-1081 > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > Provenance repository search (Mark Payne) original patch > > > >> reverted, > > > >> >> >> new > > > >> >> >> > > > patch in development? Move to 0.5.0? > > > >> >> >> > > > NIFI-1082 > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > Scrub code looking for @InputRequirement consistency > (Mark > > > >> Payne) > > > >> >> - > > > >> >> >> not > > > >> >> >> > > > sure how to attack this one > > > >> >> >> > > > NIFI-1108 > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > * NEW * > > > >> >> >> > > > LogAttribute processor fix (Oleg Zhurakousky) - trivial > > fix? > > > >> but > > > >> >> >> > breaking > > > >> >> >> > > > change? I recommend moving to 0.5.0 > > > >> >> >> > > > NIFI-1139 > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > * NEW * > > > >> >> >> > > > Race condition Fix (Oleg Zhurakousky) - assigned but no > > > patch. > > > >> >> Move > > > >> >> >> to > > > >> >> >> > > > 0.5.0 or 0.4.1? > > > >> >> >> > > > NIFI-1164 > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > * NEW * > > > >> >> >> > > > Build on windows failing (Joe Percivall) - assigned but > no > > > >> patch. > > > >> >> I > > > >> >> >> can > > > >> >> >> > > dig > > > >> >> >> > > > in. (I submitted a requst for MSDN, but can take 8 > weeks) > > > >> >> >> > > > NIFI-1165 > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Aldrin Piri < > > > >> >> [email protected]> > > > >> >> >> > > wrote: > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > >> Scanned through and removed the 0.4.0 tagging for State > > > >> >> Management. > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > > >> >> >> > > >> Thanks for the suggestion. > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > > >> >> >> > > >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Sean Busbey < > > > >> >> [email protected]> > > > >> >> >> > > wrote: > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > > >> >> >> > > >> > Has anyone had a chance to do a pass through Feature > > > >> Proposals > > > >> >> to > > > >> >> >> > move > > > >> >> >> > > >> out > > > >> >> >> > > >> > any that aren't going to make 0.4.0? > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/NiFi+Feature+Proposals > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> > > >> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Tony Kurc < > > > >> [email protected]> > > > >> >> >> > wrote: > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-61 - > > > awaiting > > > >> an > > > >> >> >> > answer > > > >> >> >> > > >> > before > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > patch can be completed > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-655 - > > > Based on > > > >> >> >> feature > > > >> >> >> > > >> branch > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > activity, is close? > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-696 - > > > >> awaiting a > > > >> >> >> patch > > > >> >> >> > > >> > marking > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > method as deprecated (assigned to me, but if > someone > > > else > > > >> >> wants > > > >> >> >> to > > > >> >> >> > > take > > > >> >> >> > > >> > it > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > and I review, thats cool too) > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-812 - > a > > > bit > > > >> >> >> confused > > > >> >> >> > > about > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > this > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > one. patch in NIFI-1086 will close this? > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-973 - > > > awaiting > > > >> >> >> review? > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-980 - > > (see > > > 812 > > > >> >> >> > > confusion) > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > presumably closed when NIFI-1086 is closed > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1009 > > > (same!) > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1054 > I'm > > at > > > >> the > > > >> >> >> ready > > > >> >> >> > to > > > >> >> >> > > >> > submit > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > a patch at the 11th hour. .gitattributes may be a > > > >> candidate > > > >> >> for > > > >> >> >> > > 0.5.0 > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1073 - > > some > > > >> bug > > > >> >> >> fixes > > > >> >> >> > > >> > awaiting > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > review. if we don't have review bandwidth can be > > > pushed to > > > >> >> next > > > >> >> >> > > release > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1081 - > > > >> reviewed, > > > >> >> >> > > probably > > > >> >> >> > > >> > needs > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > revision. Presuming the revisions can be done > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1082 - > > > Unclear > > > >> >> as to > > > >> >> >> > > >> status. > > > >> >> >> > > >> > Is > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > this awaiting review? > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1086 - > > > Seems > > > >> like > > > >> >> >> this > > > >> >> >> > > is > > > >> >> >> > > >> the > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > lynchpin for several tickets, probably should be a > > > >> priority > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1097 - > > > >> Awaiting > > > >> >> >> > review? > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1108 - > > > >> Awaiting > > > >> >> >> > comment > > > >> >> >> > > >> from > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > Mark Payne. > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1109 - > > > >> awaiting a > > > >> >> >> > merge > > > >> >> >> > > to > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > master? > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1127 - > > > >> awaiting > > > >> >> >> > review? > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1132 - > > > >> awaiting > > > >> >> >> review > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1133 - > > > >> awaiting > > > >> >> >> review > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1153 - > > > >> awaiting > > > >> >> >> review > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1155 - > > > blocker > > > >> >> bug > > > >> >> >> > > awaiting > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > patch > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > Seems like we're in good shape. I will have some > > review > > > >> >> >> bandwidth > > > >> >> >> > > this > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > evening, so if you start reviewing, please note > that > > in > > > >> the > > > >> >> >> jiras. > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > Can we get answers for 1108 and 61 and contemplate > a > > > slip > > > >> to > > > >> >> >> > 0.5.0? > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > Tony > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> > > >> > -- > > > >> >> >> > > >> > Sean > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > -- > > > >> >> > Sean > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Sean > > > > > >
