"Before I kick out Apache NiFi 0.4.0 RC1 I propose we spend a day or so doing the same sort of items we would have and if it is quiet-ish then we proceed with putting out an RC. "
we would have if what? On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: > Team, > > As you can see here [1] we are 'done' as far as 0.4.0 known tickets > go. I am ready to create the RC and would love to do so. > > Before I kick out Apache NiFi 0.4.0 RC1 I propose we spend a day or so > doing the same sort of items we would have and if it is quiet-ish then > we proceed with putting out an RC. There are a tremendous amount of > tickets/items involved in this release [2] with a few that are rather > substantive changes/features such as [3] for example. > > [1] > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1237?jql=project%20%3D%20NIFI%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.4.0%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC > > [2] > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1122?jql=project%20%3D%20NIFI%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.4.0%20ORDER%20BY%20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-655 > > Thanks > Joe > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Tony Kurc <[email protected]> wrote: > > FWIW I submitted at patch for lineendings that I don't believe will > > conflict with NIFI-655 > > On Nov 20, 2015 8:57 AM, "Joe Witt" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Getting closer! > >> > >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1122?jql=project%20%3D%20NIFI%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.4.0%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC > >> > >> Key stuff left: > >> - Wrap up NIFI-655 uname/pword stuff > >> - Make the kafka client config a little more flexible > >> - Make the user experience better for processors requiring input > >> - Fix up the tail file stuff which we all now appreciate as being > >> extraordinarily edge case challenged > >> > >> Then > >> - Tony fixes line endings (except for tests which require specific > endings) > >> - I will do RM to kick out RC > >> - We all do focused testing > >> - We do the vote > >> > >> We're a little behind the ideal timeline but these are definitely > >> things worth waiting for and we're still finding bugs during testing. > >> Once the popcorn stops popping as much (so to speak) we can zero in on > >> a release. > >> > >> Thanks > >> Joe > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Joe Percivall > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Per NiFi-1165: a discussion is occurring on the ticket: > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1165 > >> > > >> > > >> > Overall, most of the issues are identified and pending a fix from > Mark, > >> Oleg and I. The issues were encountered on two different windows 8 > machines > >> by me and on windows 2012 R2 by Mark. My configuration is maven 3.3.3 > and > >> Java 1.8.0_45 (on the machine I have in front of me). > >> > > >> > Should have a patch resolving the issues in the next couple days. > >> > > >> > Joe > >> > > >> > - - - - - - Joseph Percivall > >> > linkedin.com/in/Percivall > >> > e: [email protected] > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Monday, November 16, 2015 10:42 AM, Sean Busbey < > [email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > re: NIFI-1165 I also have a windows 7 laptop I can test on. (though > it is > >> > low power) > >> > > >> > > >> > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Aldrin Piri <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> >> I have another set of eyes for NIFI-748. Will do so now. > >> >> > >> >> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Tony Kurc <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > For those not watching commits@nifi > >> >> > I need another set of eyes on the review for NIFI-748 > >> >> > > >> >> > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > > NIFI-1082 (this should move to next release unless a resolution > is > >> >> > > imminent) > >> >> > > > >> >> > > NIFI-1108 (move to next release) > >> >> > > > >> >> > > NIFI-1139 (recommend moving to 0.5.0) > >> >> > > > >> >> > > NIFI-1164 (this should get fixed now - it makes builds > unreliable) > >> >> > > > >> >> > > NIFI-1165 (should tackle now. have a windows laptop i can build > on) > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Thanks for pushing tony. > >> >> > > > >> >> > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Tony Kurc <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> >> > > > Update: > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > Presumably fixed by NIFI-1086 (Joe Percivall). Reviewed, > awaiting > >> >> > > revision > >> >> > > > NIFI-61 > >> >> > > > NIFI-812 > >> >> > > > NIFI-980 > >> >> > > > NIFI-1009 > >> >> > > > NIFI-1086 > >> >> > > > NIFI-1133 > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > Multiple Auths (Matt Gilman) no patch yet, making progress > >> >> > > > NIFI-655 > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > Provenance Search Improvement (Oleg Zhurakousky) PR in, being > >> >> reviewed > >> >> > by > >> >> > > > Tony Kurc > >> >> > > > NIFI-748 > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > Create a Getting Started Guide (Mark Payne) Review complete, > being > >> >> > merged > >> >> > > > in by Tony Kurc > >> >> > > > NIFI-973 > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > Line ending fix (Tony Kurc) Finger hovering over "go" button > >> >> > > > NIFI-1054 > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > ExecuteStreamCommand (Joe Percivall). Reviewed, awaiting > revision > >> >> > > > NIFI-1081 > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > Provenance repository search (Mark Payne) original patch > reverted, > >> >> new > >> >> > > > patch in development? Move to 0.5.0? > >> >> > > > NIFI-1082 > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > Scrub code looking for @InputRequirement consistency (Mark > Payne) > >> - > >> >> not > >> >> > > > sure how to attack this one > >> >> > > > NIFI-1108 > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > * NEW * > >> >> > > > LogAttribute processor fix (Oleg Zhurakousky) - trivial fix? > but > >> >> > breaking > >> >> > > > change? I recommend moving to 0.5.0 > >> >> > > > NIFI-1139 > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > * NEW * > >> >> > > > Race condition Fix (Oleg Zhurakousky) - assigned but no patch. > >> Move > >> >> to > >> >> > > > 0.5.0 or 0.4.1? > >> >> > > > NIFI-1164 > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > * NEW * > >> >> > > > Build on windows failing (Joe Percivall) - assigned but no > patch. > >> I > >> >> can > >> >> > > dig > >> >> > > > in. (I submitted a requst for MSDN, but can take 8 weeks) > >> >> > > > NIFI-1165 > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Aldrin Piri < > >> [email protected]> > >> >> > > wrote: > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > >> Scanned through and removed the 0.4.0 tagging for State > >> Management. > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> Thanks for the suggestion. > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Sean Busbey < > >> [email protected]> > >> >> > > wrote: > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > Has anyone had a chance to do a pass through Feature > Proposals > >> to > >> >> > move > >> >> > > >> out > >> >> > > >> > any that aren't going to make 0.4.0? > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/NiFi+Feature+Proposals > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Tony Kurc < > [email protected]> > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-61 - awaiting > an > >> >> > answer > >> >> > > >> > before > >> >> > > >> > > patch can be completed > >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-655 - Based on > >> >> feature > >> >> > > >> branch > >> >> > > >> > > activity, is close? > >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-696 - > awaiting a > >> >> patch > >> >> > > >> > marking > >> >> > > >> > > method as deprecated (assigned to me, but if someone else > >> wants > >> >> to > >> >> > > take > >> >> > > >> > it > >> >> > > >> > > and I review, thats cool too) > >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-812 - a bit > >> >> confused > >> >> > > about > >> >> > > >> > > this > >> >> > > >> > > one. patch in NIFI-1086 will close this? > >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-973 - awaiting > >> >> review? > >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-980 - (see 812 > >> >> > > confusion) > >> >> > > >> > > presumably closed when NIFI-1086 is closed > >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1009 (same!) > >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1054 I'm at > the > >> >> ready > >> >> > to > >> >> > > >> > submit > >> >> > > >> > > a patch at the 11th hour. .gitattributes may be a > candidate > >> for > >> >> > > 0.5.0 > >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1073 - some > bug > >> >> fixes > >> >> > > >> > awaiting > >> >> > > >> > > review. if we don't have review bandwidth can be pushed to > >> next > >> >> > > release > >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1081 - > reviewed, > >> >> > > probably > >> >> > > >> > needs > >> >> > > >> > > revision. Presuming the revisions can be done > >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1082 - Unclear > >> as to > >> >> > > >> status. > >> >> > > >> > Is > >> >> > > >> > > this awaiting review? > >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1086 - Seems > like > >> >> this > >> >> > > is > >> >> > > >> the > >> >> > > >> > > lynchpin for several tickets, probably should be a > priority > >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1097 - > Awaiting > >> >> > review? > >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1108 - > Awaiting > >> >> > comment > >> >> > > >> from > >> >> > > >> > > Mark Payne. > >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1109 - > awaiting a > >> >> > merge > >> >> > > to > >> >> > > >> > > master? > >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1127 - > awaiting > >> >> > review? > >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1132 - > awaiting > >> >> review > >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1133 - > awaiting > >> >> review > >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1153 - > awaiting > >> >> review > >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1155 - blocker > >> bug > >> >> > > awaiting > >> >> > > >> > > patch > >> >> > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > Seems like we're in good shape. I will have some review > >> >> bandwidth > >> >> > > this > >> >> > > >> > > evening, so if you start reviewing, please note that in > the > >> >> jiras. > >> >> > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > Can we get answers for 1108 and 61 and contemplate a slip > to > >> >> > 0.5.0? > >> >> > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > Tony > >> >> > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > -- > >> >> > > >> > Sean > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Sean > >> > -- Sean
