So where do tickets like NIFI-1234 belong? A bug with a ready patch? On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sorry it was late :-) > > I simply mean the RC is totally available to be kicked out. But I'd > like to see folks test the master a bit more before then. We just got > all the tickets closed so I'd like to see us slow it a bit to ensure > folks are really able to spend good time testing. > > Thanks > Joe > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote: > > "Before I kick out Apache NiFi 0.4.0 RC1 I propose we spend a day or so > > doing the same sort of items we would have and if it is quiet-ish then > > we proceed with putting out an RC. " > > > > we would have if what? > > > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Team, > >> > >> As you can see here [1] we are 'done' as far as 0.4.0 known tickets > >> go. I am ready to create the RC and would love to do so. > >> > >> Before I kick out Apache NiFi 0.4.0 RC1 I propose we spend a day or so > >> doing the same sort of items we would have and if it is quiet-ish then > >> we proceed with putting out an RC. There are a tremendous amount of > >> tickets/items involved in this release [2] with a few that are rather > >> substantive changes/features such as [3] for example. > >> > >> [1] > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1237?jql=project%20%3D%20NIFI%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.4.0%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC > >> > >> [2] > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1122?jql=project%20%3D%20NIFI%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.4.0%20ORDER%20BY%20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC > >> > >> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-655 > >> > >> Thanks > >> Joe > >> > >> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Tony Kurc <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > FWIW I submitted at patch for lineendings that I don't believe will > >> > conflict with NIFI-655 > >> > On Nov 20, 2015 8:57 AM, "Joe Witt" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Getting closer! > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1122?jql=project%20%3D%20NIFI%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.4.0%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC > >> >> > >> >> Key stuff left: > >> >> - Wrap up NIFI-655 uname/pword stuff > >> >> - Make the kafka client config a little more flexible > >> >> - Make the user experience better for processors requiring input > >> >> - Fix up the tail file stuff which we all now appreciate as being > >> >> extraordinarily edge case challenged > >> >> > >> >> Then > >> >> - Tony fixes line endings (except for tests which require specific > >> endings) > >> >> - I will do RM to kick out RC > >> >> - We all do focused testing > >> >> - We do the vote > >> >> > >> >> We're a little behind the ideal timeline but these are definitely > >> >> things worth waiting for and we're still finding bugs during testing. > >> >> Once the popcorn stops popping as much (so to speak) we can zero in > on > >> >> a release. > >> >> > >> >> Thanks > >> >> Joe > >> >> > >> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Joe Percivall > >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > Per NiFi-1165: a discussion is occurring on the ticket: > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1165 > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > Overall, most of the issues are identified and pending a fix from > >> Mark, > >> >> Oleg and I. The issues were encountered on two different windows 8 > >> machines > >> >> by me and on windows 2012 R2 by Mark. My configuration is maven 3.3.3 > >> and > >> >> Java 1.8.0_45 (on the machine I have in front of me). > >> >> > > >> >> > Should have a patch resolving the issues in the next couple days. > >> >> > > >> >> > Joe > >> >> > > >> >> > - - - - - - Joseph Percivall > >> >> > linkedin.com/in/Percivall > >> >> > e: [email protected] > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > On Monday, November 16, 2015 10:42 AM, Sean Busbey < > >> [email protected]> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > re: NIFI-1165 I also have a windows 7 laptop I can test on. (though > >> it is > >> >> > low power) > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Aldrin Piri < > [email protected]> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> I have another set of eyes for NIFI-748. Will do so now. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Tony Kurc <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > For those not watching commits@nifi > >> >> >> > I need another set of eyes on the review for NIFI-748 > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > NIFI-1082 (this should move to next release unless a > resolution > >> is > >> >> >> > > imminent) > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > NIFI-1108 (move to next release) > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > NIFI-1139 (recommend moving to 0.5.0) > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > NIFI-1164 (this should get fixed now - it makes builds > >> unreliable) > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > NIFI-1165 (should tackle now. have a windows laptop i can > build > >> on) > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > Thanks for pushing tony. > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Tony Kurc <[email protected]> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> > > > Update: > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > Presumably fixed by NIFI-1086 (Joe Percivall). Reviewed, > >> awaiting > >> >> >> > > revision > >> >> >> > > > NIFI-61 > >> >> >> > > > NIFI-812 > >> >> >> > > > NIFI-980 > >> >> >> > > > NIFI-1009 > >> >> >> > > > NIFI-1086 > >> >> >> > > > NIFI-1133 > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > Multiple Auths (Matt Gilman) no patch yet, making progress > >> >> >> > > > NIFI-655 > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > Provenance Search Improvement (Oleg Zhurakousky) PR in, > being > >> >> >> reviewed > >> >> >> > by > >> >> >> > > > Tony Kurc > >> >> >> > > > NIFI-748 > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > Create a Getting Started Guide (Mark Payne) Review complete, > >> being > >> >> >> > merged > >> >> >> > > > in by Tony Kurc > >> >> >> > > > NIFI-973 > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > Line ending fix (Tony Kurc) Finger hovering over "go" button > >> >> >> > > > NIFI-1054 > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > ExecuteStreamCommand (Joe Percivall). Reviewed, awaiting > >> revision > >> >> >> > > > NIFI-1081 > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > Provenance repository search (Mark Payne) original patch > >> reverted, > >> >> >> new > >> >> >> > > > patch in development? Move to 0.5.0? > >> >> >> > > > NIFI-1082 > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > Scrub code looking for @InputRequirement consistency (Mark > >> Payne) > >> >> - > >> >> >> not > >> >> >> > > > sure how to attack this one > >> >> >> > > > NIFI-1108 > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > * NEW * > >> >> >> > > > LogAttribute processor fix (Oleg Zhurakousky) - trivial fix? > >> but > >> >> >> > breaking > >> >> >> > > > change? I recommend moving to 0.5.0 > >> >> >> > > > NIFI-1139 > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > * NEW * > >> >> >> > > > Race condition Fix (Oleg Zhurakousky) - assigned but no > patch. > >> >> Move > >> >> >> to > >> >> >> > > > 0.5.0 or 0.4.1? > >> >> >> > > > NIFI-1164 > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > * NEW * > >> >> >> > > > Build on windows failing (Joe Percivall) - assigned but no > >> patch. > >> >> I > >> >> >> can > >> >> >> > > dig > >> >> >> > > > in. (I submitted a requst for MSDN, but can take 8 weeks) > >> >> >> > > > NIFI-1165 > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Aldrin Piri < > >> >> [email protected]> > >> >> >> > > wrote: > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > >> Scanned through and removed the 0.4.0 tagging for State > >> >> Management. > >> >> >> > > >> > >> >> >> > > >> Thanks for the suggestion. > >> >> >> > > >> > >> >> >> > > >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Sean Busbey < > >> >> [email protected]> > >> >> >> > > wrote: > >> >> >> > > >> > >> >> >> > > >> > Has anyone had a chance to do a pass through Feature > >> Proposals > >> >> to > >> >> >> > move > >> >> >> > > >> out > >> >> >> > > >> > any that aren't going to make 0.4.0? > >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/NiFi+Feature+Proposals > >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> > > >> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Tony Kurc < > >> [email protected]> > >> >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-61 - > awaiting > >> an > >> >> >> > answer > >> >> >> > > >> > before > >> >> >> > > >> > > patch can be completed > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-655 - > Based on > >> >> >> feature > >> >> >> > > >> branch > >> >> >> > > >> > > activity, is close? > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-696 - > >> awaiting a > >> >> >> patch > >> >> >> > > >> > marking > >> >> >> > > >> > > method as deprecated (assigned to me, but if someone > else > >> >> wants > >> >> >> to > >> >> >> > > take > >> >> >> > > >> > it > >> >> >> > > >> > > and I review, thats cool too) > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-812 - a > bit > >> >> >> confused > >> >> >> > > about > >> >> >> > > >> > > this > >> >> >> > > >> > > one. patch in NIFI-1086 will close this? > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-973 - > awaiting > >> >> >> review? > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-980 - (see > 812 > >> >> >> > > confusion) > >> >> >> > > >> > > presumably closed when NIFI-1086 is closed > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1009 > (same!) > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1054 I'm at > >> the > >> >> >> ready > >> >> >> > to > >> >> >> > > >> > submit > >> >> >> > > >> > > a patch at the 11th hour. .gitattributes may be a > >> candidate > >> >> for > >> >> >> > > 0.5.0 > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1073 - some > >> bug > >> >> >> fixes > >> >> >> > > >> > awaiting > >> >> >> > > >> > > review. if we don't have review bandwidth can be > pushed to > >> >> next > >> >> >> > > release > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1081 - > >> reviewed, > >> >> >> > > probably > >> >> >> > > >> > needs > >> >> >> > > >> > > revision. Presuming the revisions can be done > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1082 - > Unclear > >> >> as to > >> >> >> > > >> status. > >> >> >> > > >> > Is > >> >> >> > > >> > > this awaiting review? > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1086 - > Seems > >> like > >> >> >> this > >> >> >> > > is > >> >> >> > > >> the > >> >> >> > > >> > > lynchpin for several tickets, probably should be a > >> priority > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1097 - > >> Awaiting > >> >> >> > review? > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1108 - > >> Awaiting > >> >> >> > comment > >> >> >> > > >> from > >> >> >> > > >> > > Mark Payne. > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1109 - > >> awaiting a > >> >> >> > merge > >> >> >> > > to > >> >> >> > > >> > > master? > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1127 - > >> awaiting > >> >> >> > review? > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1132 - > >> awaiting > >> >> >> review > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1133 - > >> awaiting > >> >> >> review > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1153 - > >> awaiting > >> >> >> review > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1155 - > blocker > >> >> bug > >> >> >> > > awaiting > >> >> >> > > >> > > patch > >> >> >> > > >> > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > Seems like we're in good shape. I will have some review > >> >> >> bandwidth > >> >> >> > > this > >> >> >> > > >> > > evening, so if you start reviewing, please note that in > >> the > >> >> >> jiras. > >> >> >> > > >> > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > Can we get answers for 1108 and 61 and contemplate a > slip > >> to > >> >> >> > 0.5.0? > >> >> >> > > >> > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > Tony > >> >> >> > > >> > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> > > >> > -- > >> >> >> > > >> > Sean > >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> > > >> > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > -- > >> >> > Sean > >> >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Sean >
