I’d also add that I’ve seen a fair number of other people interested in this. Very willing to collaborate on any this if you need, and looking forward to seeing the contribution.
Simon > On 18 Feb 2016, at 18:56, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: > > Pierre, > > In my view the best and first test of interest is your own. If you > see that you could use it then there is a good shot others will as > well. I think interaction with SNMP makes sense and look forward to > checking it out if you do find time to contribute that. > > Thanks > Joe > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Pierre Villard > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Would that be of any interest to have processors for SNMP exchanges using >> snmp4j? >> >> I was thinking about something like: >> >> GetSNMP >>> possibility to do a SNMP get or a SNMP walk, the flow file would not have >> any content, just attributes with key = requested oid and value = requested >> value. >> >> SetSNMP >>> do a SNMP set according to flow file / processor properties. There are >> multiple options there, don't know what sounds best. >> >> If you think it could be useful, I will have a look developing that. >> >> Pierre >
