Have you considered a trap listener, that would make a nice addition to the 
bundle.

Simon

-
Simon Elliston Ball
Product Solutions Architect
Hortonworks - Powering the future of data


On 18 Feb 2016, at 20:29, Pierre Villard 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

I created a JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1537). Will
work on it soon.

2016-02-18 21:07 GMT+01:00 Pierre Villard 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>:

Hi Joe,

I do see use cases where interactions with SNMP could be useful. I
preferred to ask because, to be honest, I am going to join the French team
at Hortonworks in about 2 months, and I am eager to collaborate in a useful
manner. Well... at least I'll do my best! So if there are improvements I
may be able to implement, I'd be happy to spend some of my spare time on it!

Pierre

2016-02-18 19:56 GMT+01:00 Joe Witt 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>:

Pierre,

In my view the best and first test of interest is your own.  If you
see that you could use it then there is a good shot others will as
well.  I think interaction with SNMP makes sense and look forward to
checking it out if you do find time to contribute that.

Thanks
Joe

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Pierre Villard
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi,

Would that be of any interest to have processors for SNMP exchanges
using
snmp4j?

I was thinking about something like:

GetSNMP
possibility to do a SNMP get or a SNMP walk, the flow file would not
have
any content, just attributes with key = requested oid and value =
requested
value.

SetSNMP
do a SNMP set according to flow file / processor properties. There are
multiple options there, don't know what sounds best.

If you think it could be useful, I will have a look developing that.

Pierre



Reply via email to