I created a JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1537). Will work on it soon.
2016-02-18 21:07 GMT+01:00 Pierre Villard <[email protected]>: > Hi Joe, > > I do see use cases where interactions with SNMP could be useful. I > preferred to ask because, to be honest, I am going to join the French team > at Hortonworks in about 2 months, and I am eager to collaborate in a useful > manner. Well... at least I'll do my best! So if there are improvements I > may be able to implement, I'd be happy to spend some of my spare time on it! > > Pierre > > 2016-02-18 19:56 GMT+01:00 Joe Witt <[email protected]>: > >> Pierre, >> >> In my view the best and first test of interest is your own. If you >> see that you could use it then there is a good shot others will as >> well. I think interaction with SNMP makes sense and look forward to >> checking it out if you do find time to contribute that. >> >> Thanks >> Joe >> >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Pierre Villard >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Would that be of any interest to have processors for SNMP exchanges >> using >> > snmp4j? >> > >> > I was thinking about something like: >> > >> > GetSNMP >> >> possibility to do a SNMP get or a SNMP walk, the flow file would not >> have >> > any content, just attributes with key = requested oid and value = >> requested >> > value. >> > >> > SetSNMP >> >> do a SNMP set according to flow file / processor properties. There are >> > multiple options there, don't know what sounds best. >> > >> > If you think it could be useful, I will have a look developing that. >> > >> > Pierre >> > >
