seems reasonable to me On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 10:14 PM, Joe Percivall < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hey Team, > > The big ticket elements of 1.0 look to be in a pretty good state. Lots of > things left to tighten up, primarily docs and bug fixes, but, it seems wise > for a major release like this to first kick out a Beta[1]. The relevant > section of the Apache.org link: > > Releases that are believed to be usable by testers and developers > outside the project, but perhaps not yet stable in terms of features or > functionality, are usually referred to as "beta" or "unstable". > > This will enable us to will open up to the broader base of users that > normally don't build from source to help test and give us a couple weeks of > feedback to work with before we do a formal 1.0 release vote. > > If no one has any objections, I will start an RC vote for it later this > week. > > [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#release-types > > Joe > - - - - - - > Joseph Percivall > linkedin.com/in/Percivall > e: [email protected] >
