+1 On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Jeff <jtsw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 9:17 AM Joe Skora <jsk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 10:49 PM, Tony Kurc <trk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > seems reasonable to me > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 10:14 PM, Joe Percivall < > > > joeperciv...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > > > > Hey Team, > > > > > > > > The big ticket elements of 1.0 look to be in a pretty good state. > Lots > > of > > > > things left to tighten up, primarily docs and bug fixes, but, it > seems > > > wise > > > > for a major release like this to first kick out a Beta[1]. The > relevant > > > > section of the Apache.org link: > > > > > > > > Releases that are believed to be usable by testers and developers > > > > outside the project, but perhaps not yet stable in terms of > > features > > > or > > > > functionality, are usually referred to as "beta" or "unstable". > > > > > > > > This will enable us to will open up to the broader base of users that > > > > normally don't build from source to help test and give us a couple > > weeks > > > of > > > > feedback to work with before we do a formal 1.0 release vote. > > > > > > > > If no one has any objections, I will start an RC vote for it later > this > > > > week. > > > > > > > > [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#release-types > > > > > > > > Joe > > > > - - - - - - > > > > Joseph Percivall > > > > linkedin.com/in/Percivall > > > > e: joeperciv...@yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > -- -- yolanda.m.da...@gmail.com @YolandaMDavis
