+1 (binding)

Verified the keys & md5 hash. Was able to startup the node and verify things 
are behaving as expected.
Verified that the README, NOTICE, and LICENSE files exist and appear to be 
correct.

Thanks for pulling this together, Joe P!

> On Aug 26, 2016, at 12:25 PM, Joe Percivall <joeperciv...@yahoo.com.INVALID> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hello Apache NiFi Community,
> 
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache NiFi,
> nifi-1.0.0.
> 
> The source zip, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachenifi-1090/
> 
> Note: There is a second binary being distributed now, the NiFi Toolkit. It
> can be used to facilitate securing a NiFi instance.
> 
> The Git tag is nifi-1.0.0-RC1
> The Git commit hash is 74d5224783dfdc513f6b3ad5ed96671d3c581707
> * 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi.git;a=commit;h=74d5224783dfdc513f6b3ad5ed96671d3c581707
> * 
> https://github.com/apache/nifi/commit/74d5224783dfdc513f6b3ad5ed96671d3c581707
> 
> Checksums of nifi-1.0.0-source-release.zip:
> MD5: 8bdba49a73b94d036fad6c63b0ebe39d
> SHA1: 504c58f9b2fb305c41598a17f5b78f68f2b2fa3d
> SHA256: 22167ede5127683ca8de6dbd2fb9112cb1de650b7cfff7e640c905521447af92
> 
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/jpercivall
> 
> KEYS file available here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/nifi/KEYS
> 
> 595 issues were closed/resolved for this release:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316020&version=12332640
> 
> Release note highlights can be found here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/Release+Notes#ReleaseNotes-Version1.0.0
> 
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test. Then
> please vote:
> 
> [ ] +1 Release this package as nifi-1.0.0
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> 
> Thanks!

Reply via email to