+1 Here as well. We desperately need it.
> On Feb 10, 2017, at 12:11 PM, Jeremy Dyer <jdy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 non-binding. I like the separation and I see a lot of need for this in
> the community.
>
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Matt Burgess <mattyb...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1 binding
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Bryan Bende <bbe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> Following a solid discussion for the past few days [1] regarding the
>>> establishment of Registry as a sub-project of Apache NiFi, I'd like to
>>> call a formal vote to record this important community decision and
>>> establish consensus.
>>>
>>> The scope of this project is to define APIs for interacting with
>>> resources that one or more NiFi instances may be interested in, such
>>> as a flow registry for versioned flows, an extension registry for
>>> extensions, and possibly other configuration resources in the future.
>>> In addition, this project will provide reference implementations of
>>> these registries, with the goal of allowing the community to build a
>>> diverse set of implementations, such as a Git provider for versioned
>>> flows, or a bintray provider for an extension registry.
>>>
>>> I am a +1 and looking forward to the future work in this area.
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours and be a majority rule vote.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Establish Registry, a subproject of Apache NiFi
>>> [ ] 0 Do not care
>>> [ ] -1 Do not establish Registry, a subproject of Apache NiFi
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Bryan
>>>
>>> [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/nifi-dev/201702.
>> mbox/%3CCALo_M19euo2LLy0PVWmE70FzeLhQRcCtX6TC%3DqoiBVfn4zFQMA%40mail.
>> gmail.com%3E
>>
