Mike, Michael, Both items noted seem fair for inclusion in whatever release vehicle follows them being merged but neither look like they'd impact release timing. Please advise if I'm misreading either of those.
Thanks Joe On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 5:42 PM, Michael Moser <[email protected]> wrote: > I would like to finish up NIFI-3599 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3599>, which just needs some > contributer / review agreement. > > -- Another Mike > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 1:28 PM, Mike Thomsen <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> If we could get this patch for HBase visibility labels merged before, I'd >> appreciate it. >> >> https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2518 >> >> If anyone else has patches they'd like to see merged, feel to ping me on >> GitHub, and I'll help out with a code review. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Mike >> >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Team, >> > >> > Looks like a ton of great work already in JIRA making a nifi 1.6.0 >> > release pretty easily justified. Lots of nice bug fixes/improvements >> > and notable we relaxed the http header corruption restrictions which >> > fixed a potential security risk but also created operations >> > challenges. >> > >> > Any glaring things to hold up on? Doing this soon doesn't preclude >> > doing another release soon but it feels like we need to get out a >> > release again. >> > >> > I'm happy to RM unless someone is really looking to do so. >> > >> > Thanks >> > >>
