+1
On 10/12/2018, 15:22, "Michael Moser" <[email protected]> wrote:
+1 from me, sounds great.
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 4:07 AM Arpad Boda <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (for being the guinea pig __ )
>
> On 09/12/2018, 04:01, "Aldrin Piri" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thanks to those of you that responded.
>
> I think my tentative plan is to give this a few more days to see if
> there
> are any strong objections. Otherwise, I'll look to file the ticket
> around
> midweek and then look to begin the process toward the end of next week
> to
> hopefully minimize disruptions. Thanks again!
>
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 12:09 PM Tony Kurc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +1, sounds like a great idea
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 7:44 AM Mike Thomsen <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:08 PM Sivaprasanna <
> [email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > I’m in. Thanks for doing it, Aldrin.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 7:32 AM, James Wing <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1, thanks for volunteering.
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Dec 7, 2018, at 13:39, Kevin Doran <
> [email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 12/7/18, 15:17, "Andy LoPresto" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Andy LoPresto
> > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4 BACE 3C6E F65B
> 2F7D
> > > EF69
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> On Dec 7, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Aldrin Piri <
> [email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Hey folks,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Daniel Gruno sent an email to the dev list about the
> deprecation
> > of
> > > > our
> > > > > >> git-wip repositories [1] (these are the canonical repos
that
> > > > committers
> > > > > >> push changes to and are currently mirrored to GitHub) and
> > > > transitioning
> > > > > to
> > > > > >> GitBox [2].
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> As highlighted in that email, this will not be an optional
> change,
> > > > only
> > > > > in
> > > > > >> when and how it happens. There was a previous discussion
> over
> > this
> > > > > topic
> > > > > >> [3] where it was generally well received but I think some
> of the
> > > > > logistics
> > > > > >> were never mapped out and thus the actual request to do so
> was
> > never
> > > > > >> executed.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I am proposing we volunteer for the early relocation. The
> process
> > > > > looks to
> > > > > >> be fairly straightforward and should ultimately only result
> in
> > > > requiring
> > > > > >> our contributors to add/replace their original git-wip
based
> > > remotes.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> If folks are in favor, I am happy to file the requisite
> INFRA
> > ticket
> > > > and
> > > > > >> provide the associated communication/docs to the community
> to make
> > > > this
> > > > > >> happen. Again, this is only about making the choice to
> perform
> > this
> > > > > >> migration now, in a coordinated manner, in lieu of the mass
> > > migration
> > > > > that
> > > > > >> would happen later.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> From a project management standpoint, I think it is a nice
> bit of
> > > > > >> functionality that lets us better curate our open PRs and,
> given
> > my
> > > > > prior
> > > > > >> interest in the subject, would like to see it happen.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> --aldrin
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> [1]
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8247bb17671d6131b1d7a646b4c018b21aac390c4f627d8fb1f421b2@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
> > > > > >> [2] https://gitbox.apache.org/
> > > > > >> [3]
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de5e103994f356b1b8a572410938eef44af8cb352210e35305c04bc9@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>