+1 as well, should ease the contribution workflow.
Thanks for volunteering Aldrin.

Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 16:41, Laszlo Horvath <[email protected]> a
écrit :

> +1
>
> On 10/12/2018, 15:22, "Michael Moser" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>     +1 from me, sounds great.
>
>
>     On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 4:07 AM Arpad Boda <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>     > +1 (for being the guinea pig __ )
>     >
>     > On 09/12/2018, 04:01, "Aldrin Piri" <[email protected]> wrote:
>     >
>     >     Thanks to those of you that responded.
>     >
>     >     I think my tentative plan is to give this a few more days to see
> if
>     > there
>     >     are any strong objections.  Otherwise, I'll look to file the
> ticket
>     > around
>     >     midweek and then look to begin the process toward the end of
> next week
>     > to
>     >     hopefully minimize disruptions.  Thanks again!
>     >
>     >     On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 12:09 PM Tony Kurc <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>     >
>     >     > +1, sounds like a great idea
>     >     >
>     >     > On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 7:44 AM Mike Thomsen <
> [email protected]>
>     >     > wrote:
>     >     >
>     >     > > +1
>     >     > >
>     >     > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:08 PM Sivaprasanna <
>     > [email protected]>
>     >     > > wrote:
>     >     > >
>     >     > > > +1 (non-binding)
>     >     > > >
>     >     > > > I’m in. Thanks for doing it, Aldrin.
>     >     > > >
>     >     > > >
>     >     > > > On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 7:32 AM, James Wing <
> [email protected]>
>     > wrote:
>     >     > > >
>     >     > > > > +1, thanks for volunteering.
>     >     > > > >
>     >     > > > > > On Dec 7, 2018, at 13:39, Kevin Doran <
>     > [email protected]>
>     >     > > wrote:
>     >     > > > > >
>     >     > > > > > +1
>     >     > > > > >
>     >     > > > > > On 12/7/18, 15:17, "Andy LoPresto" <
> [email protected]>
>     > wrote:
>     >     > > > > >
>     >     > > > > >    +1.
>     >     > > > > >
>     >     > > > > >    Andy LoPresto
>     >     > > > > >    [email protected]
>     >     > > > > >    [email protected]
>     >     > > > > >    PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4  BACE
> 3C6E F65B
>     > 2F7D
>     >     > > EF69
>     >     > > > > >
>     >     > > > > >> On Dec 7, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Aldrin Piri <
>     > [email protected]>
>     >     > > > wrote:
>     >     > > > > >>
>     >     > > > > >> Hey folks,
>     >     > > > > >>
>     >     > > > > >> Daniel Gruno sent an email to the dev list about the
>     > deprecation
>     >     > of
>     >     > > > our
>     >     > > > > >> git-wip repositories [1] (these are the canonical
> repos that
>     >     > > > committers
>     >     > > > > >> push changes to and are currently mirrored to GitHub)
> and
>     >     > > > transitioning
>     >     > > > > to
>     >     > > > > >> GitBox [2].
>     >     > > > > >>
>     >     > > > > >> As highlighted in that email, this will not be an
> optional
>     > change,
>     >     > > > only
>     >     > > > > in
>     >     > > > > >> when and how it happens.  There was a previous
> discussion
>     > over
>     >     > this
>     >     > > > > topic
>     >     > > > > >> [3] where it was generally well received but I think
> some
>     > of the
>     >     > > > > logistics
>     >     > > > > >> were never mapped out and thus the actual request to
> do so
>     > was
>     >     > never
>     >     > > > > >> executed.
>     >     > > > > >>
>     >     > > > > >> I am proposing we volunteer for the early
> relocation.  The
>     > process
>     >     > > > > looks to
>     >     > > > > >> be fairly straightforward and should ultimately only
> result
>     > in
>     >     > > > requiring
>     >     > > > > >> our contributors to add/replace their original
> git-wip based
>     >     > > remotes.
>     >     > > > > >>
>     >     > > > > >> If folks are in favor, I am happy to file the
> requisite
>     > INFRA
>     >     > ticket
>     >     > > > and
>     >     > > > > >> provide the associated communication/docs to the
> community
>     > to make
>     >     > > > this
>     >     > > > > >> happen.  Again, this is only about making the choice
> to
>     > perform
>     >     > this
>     >     > > > > >> migration now, in a coordinated manner, in lieu of
> the mass
>     >     > > migration
>     >     > > > > that
>     >     > > > > >> would happen later.
>     >     > > > > >>
>     >     > > > > >> From a project management standpoint, I think it is a
> nice
>     > bit of
>     >     > > > > >> functionality that lets us better curate our open PRs
> and,
>     > given
>     >     > my
>     >     > > > > prior
>     >     > > > > >> interest in the subject, would like to see it happen.
>     >     > > > > >>
>     >     > > > > >> --aldrin
>     >     > > > > >>
>     >     > > > > >> [1]
>     >     > > > > >>
>     >     > > > >
>     >     > > >
>     >     > >
>     >     >
>     >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8247bb17671d6131b1d7a646b4c018b21aac390c4f627d8fb1f421b2@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
>     >     > > > > >> [2] https://gitbox.apache.org/
>     >     > > > > >> [3]
>     >     > > > > >>
>     >     > > > >
>     >     > > >
>     >     > >
>     >     >
>     >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de5e103994f356b1b8a572410938eef44af8cb352210e35305c04bc9@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
>     >     > > > > >
>     >     > > > > >
>     >     > > > >
>     >     > > >
>     >     > >
>     >     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>
>
>

Reply via email to