Maybe this is an exception to the single squashed commit guidance for the initial pull?
I assume the intent is to make incremental progress and not have a PR with a hundred files affected, but if the different module changes corresponded to a different commit, GH will make it easy enough to have a draft and review each commit in isolation. Would that be a reasonable approach? -joey > On Aug 25, 2021, at 9:36 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: > > Mike, > > Seeing a pretty stunning flood of JIRAs for 'Refactor nifi-bla to use > JUnit 5' and I'm guessing we'll see the same in terms of PRs. This is > a really high administrative overhead approach to this. > > Why not break this into one or maybe a few JIRAs/PRs total? > > Thanks
