Matt What can I do now to help with maintaining v2 stuff? Do I edit the files in Git or the files in SVN? Don't want to mess with it yet because I don't understand it. But if you can give me a few pointers I can help.
Thanks Joe On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Matt Gilman <[email protected]> wrote: > I have an idea of how its going to work. However, once we reach out to > infrastructure regarding the external build (if necessary) we'll know for > sure [1]. After that discussion I will update nifi-site in our Git repo > accordingly. It says that the mailing list is infrastructure@, does that > mean [email protected]? > > Mark had an idea about an updated screenshot but higher priority things > have popped up. The image can be updated whenever its ready [2]. > > If you have any other ideas for media we should incorporate (other > screenshots, FAQs, videos, etc) let me know. > > [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.html#external > [2] > https://github.com/apache/incubator-nifi/blob/develop/nifi-site/src/images/flow.png > > On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Matt >> >> It looks good. Before we switch we should get the mechanics of update >> documented. Do you know that or is it TBD? >> >> Also do you need assistance with updating the screenshot? >> >> Joe >> On Feb 8, 2015 4:45 AM, "Matt Gilman" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Barring any objections, I'd like to more forward with the updated website >> > [1]. I've kept up with the changes with the exception of those from the >> > last few days. Assuming everyone is on board I will reach out to INFRA >> > about the possibilities for the website build. Based on that >> conservation I >> > will update the nifi-site in our Git repo [2] accordingly. I am assuming >> > that we'll be doing an external build and part of that build will be >> > deploying the site using SVN. >> > >> > [1] https://nifi.incubator.apache.org/v2/ >> > [2] https://github.com/apache/incubator-nifi/tree/develop/nifi-site >> > >> > On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 3:28 AM, Jennifer Barnabee < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > I think that's perfect! >> > > >> > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 10:08 PM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hello >> > > > >> > > > Made some of these suggested edits/simplifications to the current >> site. >> > > > New tagline >> > > > >> > > > "Apache NiFi is an easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to >> > process >> > > > and distribute data." >> > > > >> > > > Also removed the jumbotron block as it was causing some really >> strange >> > > text >> > > > sizing issues. >> > > > >> > > > Jenn - does this seem more like what you were thinking? >> > > > >> > > > Thanks >> > > > Joe >> > > > >> > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Matt Gilman < >> [email protected] >> > > >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Aldrin, >> > > > > >> > > > > What you've outline is exactly what I am looking to accomplish, I'm >> > > just >> > > > > trying to figure out all the pieces. I think I have a handle on >> > > > everything >> > > > > except actual publishing of the site. Though I believe the email >> you >> > > sent >> > > > > out earlier indicates that we just need to discuss the matter >> further >> > > > with >> > > > > infrastructure@ mailing list. I tried committing a change (outside >> > of >> > > > CMS) >> > > > > to the staging repository hoping it would kick off the publishing. >> It >> > > did >> > > > > not. >> > > > > >> > > > > I have prototyped the site artifacts which can be built into the >> > static >> > > > > site. I still need to copy over the existing content but I'm trying >> > to >> > > > > figure out where this is going to live first. Barring any >> objections >> > I >> > > am >> > > > > going to create (likely tomorrow) a nifi-site directory at the root >> > of >> > > > our >> > > > > Git repository and go from there. Currently everything is living >> in a >> > > > > repository that I forked from the work that Aldrin had started. >> > > Anyways, >> > > > I >> > > > > believe moving it to the project Git repository puts the site in a >> > more >> > > > > accessible place where others can contribute as necessary. >> > > > > >> > > > > As I mentioned to Dan earlier, I am hoping that we can utilize a >> > maven >> > > > > plugin [1] to deploy the relevant documentation (processor, guides, >> > > > > javadocs) from the application build to a predefined location. The >> > site >> > > > > would just reference it from there. This would keep the site and >> > > > > application builds independent which I think is desirable. >> > > > > >> > > > > [1] http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-scm-publish-plugin/ >> > > > > >> > > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Aldrin Piri < >> [email protected]> >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > All the comments have been good but are a bit beyond where the >> > > current >> > > > > > platform for them needs to be. Additionally, with a site more >> > > > accessible >> > > > > > and live, changes can be made via contributions. Trying to route >> > > things >> > > > > > back on topic a bit as there are external dependencies on some >> > > > > "finalized" >> > > > > > state of the site, I did some research into how other projects >> are >> > > > > > accomplishing this based off of Matt's notes. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Matt, looking at jclouds, it appears as though they also use the >> > ASF >> > > > > > infrastructure to manage their site, but perform a build through >> a >> > > > script >> > > > > > [1], invoking Jekyll to generate the static pages pushed to the >> > infra >> > > > > SVN; >> > > > > > it is a home-brewed git+svn of sorts, but the overall concept >> makes >> > > > > sense. >> > > > > > Given the technologies you listed, this seems like a fair >> approach >> > to >> > > > > > utilize the build tools right for the job while simultaneously >> not >> > > > > > requiring a special setup as outlined in the Apache CMS >> information >> > > > [2], >> > > > > > the community can freely pick the technologies they wish with the >> > > > notion >> > > > > > that the interface between site code and the actual view is >> static >> > > html >> > > > > > committed to the Infra SVN repo. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > The one area that I think is important to address though is the >> > > > > > incorporation of the material being generated in the git >> repository >> > > and >> > > > > as >> > > > > > a product of the build process. Quickly brainstorming a way to >> > > attack >> > > > > this >> > > > > > would be: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > 1. provide a top level folder in the NiFi git repository, 'site' >> > > > (Matt >> > > > > > posed this as a possibility to which no one had any objections, >> so >> > it >> > > > > seems >> > > > > > like a reasonable path forward) >> > > > > > 2. provide a script that compiles the site, making use of the >> > > desired >> > > > > > tools assuming the structure of the site >> > > > > > 3. provide orchestration of the core codebase and the site >> > > > > > a. through Maven and possibly the exec or similar plugin, >> > profile, >> > > > or >> > > > > > other avenue, build the codebase needed (mvn -pl -am may do the >> > job) >> > > > > > b. call the script to generate the static structure of the >> site >> > > > which >> > > > > > has a build target that is a copy of the svn checkout to make use >> > of >> > > > the >> > > > > > diff (maybe there is a way to use git+svn to make this work in a >> > less >> > > > > > cumbersome manner) >> > > > > > 4. commit to infra subversion >> > > > > > >> > > > > > The code for the site is easily accessible and allows submission >> of >> > > > > patches >> > > > > > via git while using the tools that make sense for accomplishing >> > what >> > > is >> > > > > > needed; Subversion just becomes the means for content delivery. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > There are certainly a number of details to iron out with the >> above >> > > > plan. >> > > > > > The biggest item is taking the disparate formats (asciidoc, >> > processor >> > > > > > documentation) and condensing them into the HTML/CSS template set >> > > > forth, >> > > > > > but both have provisions for specifying CSS, so it is certainly >> > > doable. >> > > > > > The above method allows for the avoidance of committing generated >> > > files >> > > > > to >> > > > > > the core codebase (obviously, all generated files compose the SVN >> > > > site), >> > > > > > and allows for a direct correlation between documentation and a >> > given >> > > > > > commit while simultaneously not binding the site explicitly to >> SVN >> > or >> > > > ASF >> > > > > > CMS. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > One item that seems problematic with the above plan is that it >> > would >> > > > > remove >> > > > > > the ease of submitting a patch via the provided bookmarklet that >> > > works >> > > > > with >> > > > > > the CMS. This becomes a manual process to find the source >> content >> > > and >> > > > > > apply the patch to it in Git. Although to some extent, this is >> > > already >> > > > > the >> > > > > > case given the use of Asciidoc and the Processor documentation. >> > Not >> > > > sure >> > > > > > if it is a deal breaker or not, but it is a point of >> consideration. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > [1] >> > > https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/blob/master/deploy-site.sh >> > > > > > [2] http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.html#external >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Jennifer Barnabee < >> > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > You guys are totally right. Ok, as a starting point, what >> about >> > > this >> > > > > or >> > > > > > > something like this? >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Apache NiFi is a highly configurable and intuitive dataflow >> > > > management >> > > > > > > system. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > -Jenn >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Donald Miner < >> > > > [email protected]> >> > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Same here, never heard of fbp. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I like the Accumulo blurb on the front page a lot: >> > > > > > > > The Apache Accumulo™ sorted, distributed key/value store is a >> > > > robust, >> > > > > > > > scalable, high performance data storage and retrieval system. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > (I think i based my suggestion on this). It just gets to the >> > > point >> > > > > and >> > > > > > as >> > > > > > > > a technologist that has a clue or two I know what it is >> trying >> > to >> > > > do. >> > > > > > > > Another example Kafka: "A high-throughput distributed >> messaging >> > > > > > system. " >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Jan 29, 2015, at 5:07 PM, Joey Echeverria < >> > [email protected] >> > > > >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Just to clarify, I wasn't advocating that it should be >> > removed >> > > > (I'm >> > > > > > not >> > > > > > > > > really advocating for anything). My point was meant to >> > > illustrate >> > > > > > that >> > > > > > > > it's >> > > > > > > > > not a draw, but it is potentially an educational reference. >> > So, >> > > > it >> > > > > > > > depends >> > > > > > > > > on how you want to use the real-estate in the tag line. >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Thu Jan 29 2015 at 11:19:38 AM Joe Witt < >> > [email protected] >> > > > >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> We can get rid of the FBP reference. I'll just be the >> > excited >> > > > > tech >> > > > > > > guy >> > > > > > > > in >> > > > > > > > >> the corner of the conference that keeps talking about it. >> > > > > > > > >>>> On Jan 29, 2015 1:00 PM, "Joey Echeverria" < >> > > [email protected]> >> > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > > >>> I understand that flow-based programming is very >> important >> > as >> > > > the >> > > > > > > model >> > > > > > > > >> of >> > > > > > > > >>> NiFi, but I don't think it's a widely understood term. >> > FWIW, >> > > I >> > > > > > hadn't >> > > > > > > > >> heard >> > > > > > > > >>> of it until I started working with NiFi. >> > > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > > >>> On Thu Jan 29 2015 at 9:56:10 AM Jennifer Barnabee < >> > > > > > > > >>> [email protected]> wrote: >> > > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > > >>>> Hi Donald, >> > > > > > > > >>>> I like your tagline sentence for the most part. Thanks >> so >> > > much >> > > > > for >> > > > > > > > >>> sending >> > > > > > > > >>>> it. Maybe it can get us to where we want to be... >> > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>> I have these thoughts to add... >> > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>> a) I think we want to honor that flow-based programming >> is >> > > the >> > > > > > basis >> > > > > > > > of >> > > > > > > > >>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>> software. So, that's important, and I think that's why >> it >> > > went >> > > > > > into >> > > > > > > > the >> > > > > > > > >>>> tagline. But I'm not sure whether it has to be >> > specifically >> > > > > there. >> > > > > > > > >>> Someone >> > > > > > > > >>>> else can weigh in on that. >> > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>> b) My only problem with your tagline is the last part: >> > > > > "transform >> > > > > > > and >> > > > > > > > >>> move >> > > > > > > > >>>> files". One thing is - we don't want to limit NiFi to >> > being >> > > > only >> > > > > > > > >>>> file-based. Secondly, moving and transforming data is >> not >> > > all >> > > > > that >> > > > > > > > NiFi >> > > > > > > > >>>> does. In truth, NiFi is not just a dataflow system. >> It's a >> > > > > > dataflow >> > > > > > > > >>>> management system. And that encompasses everything about >> > the >> > > > > > > dataflow, >> > > > > > > > >>> from >> > > > > > > > >>>> how the data moves and/or gets transformed and routed, >> to >> > > how >> > > > > you >> > > > > > > > >> monitor >> > > > > > > > >>>> that, how you track down the data, how you configure and >> > > > design >> > > > > > the >> > > > > > > > >>>> dataflow to be better, etc. The moving and transforming >> > > parts >> > > > > are >> > > > > > > > just >> > > > > > > > >>>> some of the extension points. It's the framework that >> > allows >> > > > you >> > > > > > to >> > > > > > > > >>> manage >> > > > > > > > >>>> *whatever* you do with the data. >> > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>> So, now that I've rambled on, it's clear that I can't >> come >> > > up >> > > > > with >> > > > > > > > >>>> something concise. I think I may be too close to >> > everything >> > > > :-) >> > > > > > > > >>>> But I think you are on the right track! I would be happy >> > to >> > > > know >> > > > > > > what >> > > > > > > > >>>> others think. It would be great if people could land on >> > the >> > > > page >> > > > > > and >> > > > > > > > >>>> quickly understand what NiFi is. So far, your sentence >> > would >> > > > get >> > > > > > > > people >> > > > > > > > >>>> closer to that than anything I have proposed. >> > > > > > > > >>>> Cheers, >> > > > > > > > >>>> Jenn >> > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Donald Miner < >> > > > > > > [email protected] >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>> On the subject of taglines, a minor nitpick (sorry). >> I'm >> > > > just a >> > > > > > fan >> > > > > > > > >> of >> > > > > > > > >>>>> concise and meaningful taglines. >> > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>> "is a dataflow system based on the concepts of >> flow-based >> > > > > > > > >> programming. >> > > > > > > > >>> It >> > > > > > > > >>>>> is currently a part of the Apache Incubator." is rather >> > > > wordy. >> > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>> "flow" and "based" are in this sentence twice, which >> > makes >> > > it >> > > > > > kind >> > > > > > > of >> > > > > > > > >>>>> awkward. Does flow-based programming really matter >> enough >> > > to >> > > > be >> > > > > > > part >> > > > > > > > >> of >> > > > > > > > >>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>> tagline? Maybe it should just be a bullet point below. >> > Same >> > > > > with >> > > > > > > > >>>> incubator >> > > > > > > > >>>>> status... I think that's readily available information >> > that >> > > > > > doesn't >> > > > > > > > >>>>> necessarily need to be in the tagline (and would >> > eventually >> > > > > > > change). >> > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>> Here's my stab: >> > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>> "The Apache NiFi dataflow system is an easy to use, >> > highly >> > > > > > > > >>> configurable, >> > > > > > > > >>>>> extendable, and reliable way to transform and move >> > files." >> > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>> I think the list of properties in the middle of my >> > sentence >> > > > > could >> > > > > > > be >> > > > > > > > >>>>> replaced by someone who has a better idea of what the >> > true >> > > > > > sticking >> > > > > > > > >>>> points >> > > > > > > > >>>>> for NiFi will be. >> > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>> -d >> > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Joe Witt < >> > > > [email protected]> >> > > > > > > > >> wrote: >> > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Jenn >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Apologies for the delayed feedback. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> I agree it could be more concise but feel like the >> > > proposed >> > > > is >> > > > > > too >> > > > > > > > >>>>> concise >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> to as have lost some important meaning. Many projects >> > > claim >> > > > > > > > >> they're >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> lightweight, scalable, and easy to use and almost >> always >> > > > that >> > > > > > just >> > > > > > > > >>>> isn't >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> true. We're arguably not 'lightweight' anymore. We >> > could >> > > > > have >> > > > > > > > >> said >> > > > > > > > >>>> that >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> when it was a 6 MB download perhaps but now that we're >> > > > > weighing >> > > > > > in >> > > > > > > > >> at >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> 100MB's we probably shouldn't claim that on its own. >> > > We're >> > > > > > > > >> certainly >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> 'lightweight' in many important aspects and arguably >> in >> > > all >> > > > > the >> > > > > > > > >> ways >> > > > > > > > >>>> that >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> truly matter but we should be at least somewhat >> > > specific. I >> > > > > > agree >> > > > > > > > >>>> we're >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> scalable but again without context that feels >> > > misleading. I >> > > > > > agree >> > > > > > > > >> we >> > > > > > > > >>>>> have >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> an extremely nice UI that is indeed highly >> configurable >> > > and >> > > > > > > > >> intuitive >> > > > > > > > >>>> but >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> the same thoughts apply which is we should provide >> some >> > > > > context >> > > > > > as >> > > > > > > > >> to >> > > > > > > > >>>>> what >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> we mean. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> This is the nice part of this as an open source thing. >> > We >> > > > can >> > > > > > > just >> > > > > > > > >>> be >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> straight up and precise about the features and what >> > > they're >> > > > > good >> > > > > > > > >> for >> > > > > > > > >>>> and >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> what they do. We can even be self deprecating and >> point >> > > out >> > > > > > what >> > > > > > > > >>> we're >> > > > > > > > >>>>> not >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> good at. If it were a commercial construct or we were >> > > > > marketing >> > > > > > > > >> then >> > > > > > > > >>>> we >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> might need to be less specific so as not to exclude >> some >> > > > > > potential >> > > > > > > > >>>>> business >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> area. But in this case, we're a tiny little open >> source >> > > > > project >> > > > > > > > >> that >> > > > > > > > >>>>> very >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> few people know about. We're only going to grow by >> > being >> > > > > > > > >>>> straightforward >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> about what it is and attracting those who buy in to >> that >> > > > > vision >> > > > > > > and >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> direction. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Just thoughts here - i am not asking you to avoid >> > changing >> > > > it >> > > > > > > > >> should >> > > > > > > > >>>> you >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> feel really strongly that you want to change it. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Joe >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 6:04 AM, Jennifer Barnabee < >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Hi Matt et al - >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> The new website design is looking great... I feel >> like >> > > the >> > > > > > text >> > > > > > > > >>>> needs >> > > > > > > > >>>>> to >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> be simpler and more to the point. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> For the tagline under the first Apache nifi heading, >> I >> > > > > suggest >> > > > > > > > >>> making >> > > > > > > > >>>>> it >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> bullet rather than including the verb "is". I'd also >> > like >> > > > to >> > > > > > make >> > > > > > > > >>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> features into simpler bullets. See my suggested text >> > > > below. I >> > > > > > > > >> hope >> > > > > > > > >>> it >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> still >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> captures the essence of what we want to convey, but >> > > others >> > > > > may >> > > > > > > > >> have >> > > > > > > > >>>>> good >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> suggestions as well... For example, in the last >> > bullet, >> > > I >> > > > > > don't >> > > > > > > > >>> know >> > > > > > > > >>>>> if >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> "client" would be better than "user" or if >> > > "authentication" >> > > > > > would >> > > > > > > > >>> be >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> better >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> than "authorization". You guys probably have a better >> > > > handle >> > > > > on >> > > > > > > > >>> that >> > > > > > > > >>>>> type >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> of stuff. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> *Apache nifi * >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> - A dataflow system based on the concepts of >> flow-based >> > > > > > > > >>> programming. >> > > > > > > > >>>> It >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> is >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> currently a part of the Apache Incubator. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Apache NiFi supports powerful and scalable directed >> > > graphs >> > > > of >> > > > > > > > >> data >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> routing, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> transformation, and system mediation logic. >> High-level >> > > > > features >> > > > > > > > >>>>> include: >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> - Lightweight >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> - Scalable >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> - Highly Configurable >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> - Intuitive User Interface >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> - Component-based Extension Model >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> - Fine Grained Data Provenance >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> - Enterprise & Inter-system Security >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> - Content Encryption/Decryption >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> - Pluggable SSL & PKI User Authorization >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> *I kinda don't like that you have to scroll down to >> see >> > > all >> > > > > the >> > > > > > > > >>>>> features. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> But I realize it wouldn't bother me if I was looking >> at >> > > it >> > > > on >> > > > > > my >> > > > > > > > >>>> phone, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> so >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> I don't know why I'm complaining about that... * >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Cheers, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Jenn >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 11:43 PM, Matt Gilman < >> > > > > > > > >>>> [email protected] >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I went ahead and started implementing the website >> > based >> > > on >> > > > > the >> > > > > > > > >>> most >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> recent >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> feedback and mock ups. I've done just the main page >> > and >> > > > put >> > > > > it >> > > > > > > > >>>> here: >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> http://nifi.incubator.apache.org/v2/ >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Please let me know if there's a more appropriate >> place >> > > to >> > > > > host >> > > > > > > > >>>> that. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Anyways, I am going to continue working to port over >> > the >> > > > > > > > >>> remaining >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> pages >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> and figure out a good way to integrate the >> > documentation >> > > > > that >> > > > > > > > >> is >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> generated >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> from building NiFi. Part of that is likely going to >> > > depend >> > > > > on >> > > > > > > > >>> what >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> repository the site is kept in. What I've done uses >> a >> > > > number >> > > > > > of >> > > > > > > > >>>> tools >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> (grunt, assemble, bower, etc) to actually build the >> > > site. >> > > > I >> > > > > > > > >>> believe >> > > > > > > > >>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Apache CMS tool will be CMing the resulting site. >> > Where >> > > do >> > > > > > > > >> others >> > > > > > > > >>>> CM >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> actual development artifacts of their sites? I did >> > find >> > > > > > another >> > > > > > > > >>>>> Apache >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> project with a similar set up: >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> and they appear to have a separate repository for >> > there >> > > > > site. >> > > > > > > > >>>> Should >> > > > > > > > >>>>> I >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> be >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> requesting another repository for this? Or should I >> > just >> > > > add >> > > > > > it >> > > > > > > > >>> to >> > > > > > > > >>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> existing incubator-nifi and have a top level folder >> > for >> > > > the >> > > > > > > > >> site? >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Also, I also noticed that jclouds has a deployment >> > > script >> > > > > > which >> > > > > > > > >>>>> appears >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> to >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> automate that process as well. Is this how most >> > projects >> > > > > > handle >> > > > > > > > >>>> site >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> updates? >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Matt >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Aldrin Piri < >> > > > > > > > >>> [email protected] >> > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Seems like a fair list of points to resolve. Let >> me >> > > know >> > > > > how >> > > > > > > > >>> you >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> want >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> to tackle it and if you'd like me to investigate >> any >> > of >> > > > > them. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> AsciiDoc provides an HTML5 backend [1] that should >> > > > provide >> > > > > a >> > > > > > > > >>> hook >> > > > > > > > >>>>> to >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> help it be consistent in some form with the rest of >> > the >> > > > > site. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> [1] >> > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/asciidoc.css-embedded.html#X35 >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Matt Gilman < >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> [email protected]> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Agreed. Lets see give it a try and see how it >> > looks. I >> > > > > > > > >>> thought >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> about >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> possibly just putting the drop in the toolbar but >> > held >> > > > off >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> initially >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> but >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> your comment about being consistently visible >> across >> > > all >> > > > > > > > >>> pages >> > > > > > > > >>>> is >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> on >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> point. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> This brings up another issue that the current >> > > > > documentation >> > > > > > > > >>>> loads >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> in >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> page >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> without the toolbar so that'll have to be >> addressed. >> > > > > > > > >> Haven't >> > > > > > > > >>>>> messed >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> with >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> bootstrap so I'll have to see what's possible. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Outstanding issues... >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> - Better integrate documentation pages into >> website >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> - Get updated images (and properly scale them) >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> - Update website markup for production use (what I >> > did >> > > > was >> > > > > > > > >>>> quick >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> and >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> just >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> for the mockup so we continue this discussion) >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Anything else I'm forgetting? >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Aldrin Piri < >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> [email protected]> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Matt, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Looks good here. I think clean and simple is the >> > > right >> > > > > > > > >>>>> direction >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> and >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> this >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> is just another step in that evolution. I think >> it >> > > is a >> > > > > > > > >>> matter >> > > > > > > > >>>>> of >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> nit-picking at this point so the following >> comments >> > > > come >> > > > > > > > >>> with >> > > > > > > > >>>>> that >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> scope of >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> importance. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I would like to see the logo make it somewhere on >> > the >> > > > > page >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> consistently >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> for >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the sake of keeping it across all pages in the >> > > site. I >> > > > > > > > >>>> realize >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> logo in >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the navbar is rather redundant for the home page, >> > but >> > > > on >> > > > > > > > >> all >> > > > > > > > >>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> other >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> pages such as documentation and general project >> > > > > > > > >> information, >> > > > > > > > >>>>> there >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> will >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> be >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> no presence in the current state. One way to >> > > > compromise >> > > > > > > > >>> might >> > > > > > > > >>>>> be >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> to >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> make >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> use of the commonplace technique where the logo >> on >> > > the >> > > > > > > > >> main >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> content >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> area >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> gets placed into the navbar when scrolling would >> > > > obscure >> > > > > > > > >> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>> logo; >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> all >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> other pages would then just have it in the >> header. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Maybe a slightly heavier weight on the navbar for >> > the >> > > > > menu >> > > > > > > > >>>>> items. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 22:51 Matt Gilman < >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> [email protected]> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Aldrin, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I like what you did here and it sounds like most >> > > > people >> > > > > > > > >> do >> > > > > > > > >>>>> too. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> I >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> wanted >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> to >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> provide some feedback and minor suggestions but >> > > > thought >> > > > > > > > >> it >> > > > > > > > >>>>> would >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> just >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> be >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> easier to mock it up myself rather than trying >> to >> > > ask >> > > > > > > > >> you >> > > > > > > > >>> to >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> move >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> this >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> here >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and that there. Anyways, take a peek and lets >> > > continue >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> iterating. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> I >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> think >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> we're on the right track. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://raw.githubusercontent. >> > > > > > > > >>>> com/mcgilman/apache-nifi-site/ >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> screenshots/index.html.lite.v1.2.png >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Matt >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:05 PM, Joe Witt < >> > > > > > > > >>>>> [email protected]> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Dan, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> No real thought behind it. But I personally >> > agree >> > > > > > > > >> with >> > > > > > > > >>>> your >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> statement: >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the logos look good as "nifi" and the text >> looks >> > > good >> > > > > > > > >> as >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> "NiFi" >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Daniel Bress >> < >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aldrin, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think this looks good. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> All, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this is a little off topic, but I >> > noticed >> > > > > > > > >>> that >> > > > > > > > >>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> logos >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistently use "nifi" whereas in text its >> > > > > > > > >>> consistently >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> written >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> as >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "NiFi". Any reason for the difference? >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I kind of thing the logos look good as >> "nifi" >> > > and >> > > > > > > > >>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> text >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> looks >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> good >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> as "NiFi" so I might be questioning something >> > > that I >> > > > > > > > >>> am >> > > > > > > > >>>> OK >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> with. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> But I >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> noticed they are different and was wondering >> if >> > > this >> > > > > > > > >>>> was a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> conscious >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> decision or not. Thoughts? >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dan Bress >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Software Engineer >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ONYX Consulting Services >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________________ >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Joe Witt <[email protected]> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 6:40 PM >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Website Theme >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Solid design and agree with all your comments >> > > > > > > > >> aldrin. >> > > > > > > > >>>>> Very >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> nice >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 20, 2015 6:27 PM, "Aldrin Piri" < >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> [email protected]> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mark, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the comments. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I actuality tried it without the logo on the >> > main >> > > > > > > > >>> page >> > > > > > > > >>>>> and >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> it >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> felt >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bit empty. I don't know that we necessarily >> > need >> > > > > > > > >>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>> logo >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> there, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> but >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something is needed. Additionally, I viewed >> it >> > > as >> > > > > > > > >>>> being >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> just >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> "front >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page" inclusion, as other pages would just >> have >> > > > > > > > >> the >> > > > > > > > >>>> top >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> navbar. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You caught me. I was lazy and I recycled the >> > > > > > > > >>>> screenshot >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> from >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first iteration. It would definitely need >> > > > > > > > >> updating, >> > > > > > > > >>>> but >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> is >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> largely >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a placeholder for the concept. I would >> > > > > > > > >>>> definitely >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> like >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> something >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a bit more engaging. (faux edit) I >> rearranged >> > > > > > > > >>> things >> > > > > > > > >>>> a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> bit, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> removing >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the second instance of the logo and placing >> > more >> > > > > > > > >>>>> emphasis >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> on >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> one >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the corner of the application. Not sure >> if >> > I >> > > > > > > > >>> like >> > > > > > > > >>>> it >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> better, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> but >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've provided the results [1] with all three >> of >> > > > > > > > >> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> submissions >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> shown >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in chronological order [2]. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The news section is a toss-up for me at this >> > > > > > > > >>> juncture. >> > > > > > > > >>>>> I >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> could >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> see >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the need one for eventually, but I'm not sure >> > if >> > > > > > > > >> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> project >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> is >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> quite >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there yet. It seemed a common thread among >> > > > > > > > >>> incubating >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> sites >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> that >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> such >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a section was omitted whereas those top-level >> > > > > > > > >>> projects >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> typically >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> included one. Given that the project is on >> the >> > > > > > > > >>> verge >> > > > > > > > >>>> on >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> first >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> of >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the regular releases, perhaps this is >> > > increasingly >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> pertinent >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> in >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> near future. At minimum, one of the screen >> > grabs >> > > > > > > > >>> from >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> your >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> blog >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> posts >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be a good candidate. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >> > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apiri/apache-nifi-site/scr >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> eenshots/index.html.lite.v1.1.png >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] >> > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > > https://github.com/apiri/apache-nifi-site/blob/screenshots/README.md >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Mark Payne >> < >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> [email protected] >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aldrin, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm liking it! Definitely looks nice. >> Though I >> > > > > > > > >>> would >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> provide a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> bit >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> of >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback: >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure that I would include the NiFi >> > logo >> > > > > > > > >> on >> > > > > > > > >>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> right-hand >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> side, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since it's already in the top-left. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From a NiFi 'brand' perspective, I would >> > update >> > > > > > > > >>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> screenshot a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> bit. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This screenshot is using the old logo in the >> > > > > > > > >>> top-left >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> corner, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> and >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> graph >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shows all of the data disappearing before the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> RouteOnAttribute >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Processor. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd recommend we construct a dataflow that's >> > more >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> appealing >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> to >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> target >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> audience, perhaps integrating with other >> Apache >> > > > > > > > >>>> projects >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> (HDFS, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Kafka >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> are >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible, for instance) or using (S)FTP >> > > processor. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does it make sense to have maybe like a >> > 'Latest >> > > > > > > > >>>> News' >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> section >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> or >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something where we could post things like >> > > "Version >> > > > > > > > >>>> 0.0.1 >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> just >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> released!" >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.? >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm really liking the concept - nice job! >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks-Mark >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 07:00:52 -0800 >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Website Theme >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: [email protected] >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I like it. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Aldrin >> Piri >> > < >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I found some time today to provide another >> > > > > > > > >> look >> > > > > > > > >>>> for >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> site. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> There >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were very minor changes to the core HTML >> as >> > > > > > > > >> is >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> currently >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> served >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> at >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nidi homepage and it is largely just a >> > > > > > > > >>>> stylesheet. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> This >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> one >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> is >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> highly >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minimal and clean, still driven by >> Bootstrap >> > > > > > > > >>> and >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> directly >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> makes >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> use >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the colors from the UI itself. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A screenshot can be seen at >> > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apiri/apache-nifi-site/scr >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> eenshots/index.html.lite.png >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the associated code under the "lite" >> > > > > > > > >>> branch >> > > > > > > > >>>> at >> > > > > > > > >>>>> https://github.com/apiri/apache-nifi-site/tree/lite >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts are appreciated. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Aldrin >> Piri >> > < >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry if this somehow gets sent twice. >> My >> > > > > > > > >>>> first >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> submission >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> seemed >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bounce as it exceeded the spam threshold >> > > > > > > > >>> when I >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> sent >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> it a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> couple >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hours ago and it has yet to appear, so >> I'm >> > > > > > > > >>>>> sending >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> again. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> First and foremost, good feedback. I >> think >> > > > > > > > >>>> UI/UX >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> stuff >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> is >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> tricky >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am happy to find my livelihood in the >> > > > > > > > >>>> plumbing >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> and >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> behind >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scenes >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's my attempt to try and tackle all >> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> comments >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> in >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> one >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> fell >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> swoop: >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree that Bootstrap is everywhere, >> but I >> > > > > > > > >>>> don't >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> necessarily >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> think >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is a bad thing. One could argue >> that >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> interfaces >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> of >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> all >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> forms >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> converging and users have the instant >> > > > > > > > >>>> familiarity >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> of >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> known >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quantity. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that I am totally unaware of what >> it >> > > > > > > > >>>> takes >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> to >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> make a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> site >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> functional and maintain its feel across >> > > > > > > > >>>>> devices. I >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> think >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> that >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> last >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> part is important. Personally, as a user >> > > > > > > > >> on >> > > > > > > > >>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> other >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> side >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> of >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> screen, I don't really understand why >> sites >> > > > > > > > >>> do >> > > > > > > > >>>>> not >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> work >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> or >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> jive >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my mobile device du jour these days; it >> > > > > > > > >>> should >> > > > > > > > >>>>> just >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> work. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> With >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> what >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> little I've learned about UX and "Not >> > > > > > > > >> Making >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> [Anyone] >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Think,"[1] I >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want an effortless experience; no pinch >> > > > > > > > >>>> zooming, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> tap >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> panning, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> etc. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is a way to take bits and pieces of >> > > > > > > > >>>>> bootstrap >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> to >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> this >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> end >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> support that aspect without the cookie >> > > > > > > > >> cutter >> > > > > > > > >>>>> air, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> I >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> would >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> be >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> quite >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thankful for some guidance on that front >> > > > > > > > >> and >> > > > > > > > >>> do >> > > > > > > > >>>>> my >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> best >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> to >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> provide >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Out of the box though, the sample looked >> > > > > > > > >>> pretty >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> decent >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> across >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> all >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> devices to which I had access, and used >> > > > > > > > >>>>> constructs >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> everyone >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> who >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> views >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content through a tiny screen is >> > > > > > > > >> accustomed. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do agree on the front of the >> possibility >> > > > > > > > >> of >> > > > > > > > >>>>> brand >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> dilution, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> and >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think it is an excellent point for >> > > > > > > > >>>> consideration. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> As >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> mentioned >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> in >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> original mailing, consideration was given >> > > > > > > > >> to >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> integrating >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> application's aesthetics into the core >> > > > > > > > >> site. >> > > > > > > > >>>> Not >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> sure >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> if >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> this >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> will >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pan out in an appreciable way as I can >> see >> > > > > > > > >> it >> > > > > > > > >>>> in >> > > > > > > > >>>>> my >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> mind, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> but >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> do >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feel it is an avenue worth exploring. It >> > > > > > > > >> may >> > > > > > > > >>>>> also >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> completely >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> miss >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mark, but with my new found web dev >> > > > > > > > >> prowess, >> > > > > > > > >>> it >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> should >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> be a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> much >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quicker iteration than the first draft. >> > > > > > > > >>> You'll >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> see a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> slight >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> homage >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this via the graph wallpaper that is >> > > > > > > > >> featured >> > > > > > > > >>>> in >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> application >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itself. This was muted a bit by a CSS >> > > > > > > > >>> overlay >> > > > > > > > >>>>> to a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> level >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> that >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seemed >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> okay, but I definitely hedged as to >> whether >> > > > > > > > >>> or >> > > > > > > > >>>>> not >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> to >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> include >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> it. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ultimately, I wanted to get something out >> > > > > > > > >> to >> > > > > > > > >>>>> start >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> ball >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rolling, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> establishing a base for successive >> > > > > > > > >>>> iterations. I >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> know >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> that >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> with >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> all >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the hard work everyone is putting in, the >> > > > > > > > >>>> project >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> is >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> closely >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reaching >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its first milestone for release, and >> > > > > > > > >> thought >> > > > > > > > >>> it >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> important to >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> chip >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> where possible to give a face to the >> > > > > > > > >> project. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Additionally, I think this particular >> > > > > > > > >> project >> > > > > > > > >>>>> needs >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> pictures >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> demonstrate what it's capabilities. One >> of >> > > > > > > > >>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> facets >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> that >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> makes >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believer about NiFi as a whole is that >> the >> > > > > > > > >>> end >> > > > > > > > >>>>> user >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> is >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> not >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> just >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> developers. Citing the previous example >> of >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Accumulo, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> its >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> intended >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> audience is very technical in nature and, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> accordingly, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> lot >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> can >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expressed via the simple phrase of >> > > > > > > > >> "key-value >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> store." >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> would >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contend >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that NiFi's reach is far broader and >> can't >> > > > > > > > >> be >> > > > > > > > >>>>> done >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> justice >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> with >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simple phrase. For the casual potential >> > > > > > > > >> user >> > > > > > > > >>>> who >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> has >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> strung >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> together >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> n-many processes of taking a file, >> manually >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> transforming >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> it, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moving it elsewhere, they need to see at >> > > > > > > > >>> quick >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> glance >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> that >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> there >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something that can automate this tedium >> and >> > > > > > > > >>>> make >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> them >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> more >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> effective. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Succinctly, the value proposition needs >> to >> > > > > > > > >> be >> > > > > > > > >>>>> there >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> not >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> only >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> for >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> technical folks who will use this as a >> > > > > > > > >>>> framework, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> but >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> additionally >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> end users. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The background for the header isn't >> > > > > > > > >> awesome, >> > > > > > > > >>>> but >> > > > > > > > >>>>> I >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> knew I >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wasn't >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> violating any licenses if I generated it >> > > > > > > > >>>>> myself. I >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> viewed >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> it >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> more >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a placeholder than anything else. >> > > > > > > > >> Definitely >> > > > > > > > >>>>> not a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> front >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> end >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> web >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> developer, even more definitively not a >> > > > > > > > >>> graphic >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> artist. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> The >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> colors >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> came from starting with the logo dark >> blue >> > > > > > > > >>> and >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> running >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> whole >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bunch >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of filters and plugins via GIMP to get >> > > > > > > > >>>> something. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Additionally, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a CSS gradient applied over top of it >> as >> > > > > > > > >>>> well >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> when >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> it >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> seemed >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bit >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too loud. It could definitely deal with >> > > > > > > > >>> being >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> muted >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> bit >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> more. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://www.sensible.com/dmmt.html >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Tony >> Kurc >> > > > > > > > >> < >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey! It looks awesome! The existing site >> > > > > > > > >> was >> > > > > > > > >>>> put >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> together a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> placeholder >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we went with a very generic layout that >> > > > > > > > >>> worked >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> well >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> with >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Apache >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CMS and >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contained all the information expected >> of >> > > > > > > > >> an >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> apache >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> process. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is a big improvement! For people >> new >> > > > > > > > >> to >> > > > > > > > >>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> project, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> it >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> gives >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nice >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> upfront screenshot, with big fat links >> for >> > > > > > > > >>>>> things >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> I >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> care >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> about >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seeing! >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some things I didn't like about the >> > > > > > > > >> existing >> > > > > > > > >>>>> site >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> are >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> glyphicon >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> links >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to "external" sites on the menu. I used >> > > > > > > > >>>> "link", >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> but >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> I >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> think >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> it >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meant to >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be used for "permalink". Also, we kind >> of >> > > > > > > > >>>> took a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> best >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> guess >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> about >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should go in each dropdown in the menu. >> > > > > > > > >> I'm >> > > > > > > > >>>>> pretty >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> sure >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> it >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> could >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> organized. I'd also like to see the >> > > > > > > > >> awesome >> > > > > > > > >>>>> guides >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> that >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> people >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent theme with the website and >> > > > > > > > >> maybe >> > > > > > > > >>>> have >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> pdfs >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> so >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> old-school >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folks >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can print them out (which may be a dumb >> > > > > > > > >> idea >> > > > > > > > >>>> ;) >> > > > > > > > >>>>> ) >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> A >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> pet >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> peeve >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> of >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mine of >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects is having a hard time finding >> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> documentation I >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> need, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> javadocs or specifications - and keeping >> > > > > > > > >>>> around >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> older >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation. I think we're still >> working >> > > > > > > > >>> on >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> these >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> - >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> since >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> you >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> retained >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the menu up top it should be >> > > > > > > > >> straightforward >> > > > > > > > >>>> to >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> have a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> robust >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dropdown. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The blue you used is more of a reddish >> or >> > > > > > > > >>>>> purplish >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> blue >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> - >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> blue >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the app is more of a greenish blue. I'm >> > > > > > > > >> kind >> > > > > > > > >>>> of >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> curious >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> what >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> greener >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blue >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would look like ... did you mock one up >> > > > > > > > >> and >> > > > > > > > >>> it >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> looked >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> bad? >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Or >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maybe a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fundamental question, should the website >> > > > > > > > >>> evoke >> > > > > > > > >>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> theme of >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> app? I >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't know how I feel. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tony >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Joe >> Witt >> > > > > > > > >> < >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd say the two sides of the spectrum >> as >> > > > > > > > >>>>> examples >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> are: >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://kafka.apache.org/ [super >> > > > > > > > >>> minimalist] >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://aurora.incubator.apache.org/ [ >> > > > > > > > >>> quite >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> fancy >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> looking ] >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both in my opinion are beautifully done >> > > > > > > > >> and >> > > > > > > > >>>>> make >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> it >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> easy >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> to >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> get >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> needed. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think these (and others) provide >> great >> > > > > > > > >>>>> examples >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> that >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> both >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sides >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spectrum have merit. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What is most important to me is that we >> > > > > > > > >> as >> > > > > > > > >>> a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> community >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> rally >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> behind >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the expertise and willingness to >> > > > > > > > >>>>> contribute >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> in >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> this >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> space. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Joe >> > > > > > > > >> Witt < >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both are bootstrap based. Each is an >> > > > > > > > >>>>> iterative >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> improvement. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And we >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep iterating as folks have time, >> > > > > > > > >>>>> willingness, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> and >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> expertise >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to do >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree that this new look does not >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> distinguish a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> brand. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> But >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we're >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mature enough to worry about that yet. >> > > > > > > > >>> We >> > > > > > > > >>>>> just >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> need >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> enough >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> of >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> info laid out enough to help grow a >> > > > > > > > >>>> community >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> and >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> get >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> folks >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> info >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need. We need it laid out in a way >> > > > > > > > >> that >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> multiple >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> folks >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> can >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contribute. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Once we have a release, recruit some >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> committers, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> demonstrate >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> progress on >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Apache Way and grow then perhaps >> > > > > > > > >>>> branding >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> becomes a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> bigger >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deal. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ..this motivates me to spawn another >> > > > > > > > >>> thread >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> about >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> type >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> of >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> community >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want to be... >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Adam >> > > > > > > > >>> Taft >> > > > > > > > >>>> < >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This isn't a downvote -- I think it >> > > > > > > > >>> indeed >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> looks >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> good. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> But >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> terms of >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> constructive criticism... >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think the mockup looks like a very >> > > > > > > > >>>> generic >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> "bootstrap" >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> site, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> similar >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> million other bootstrap based sites. >> > > > > > > > >>> I'd >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> personally >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> almost >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prefer >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> existing utilitarian website over a >> > > > > > > > >>>>> bootstrap >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> theme, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> simply >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't try to be anything more than >> > > > > > > > >>> what >> > > > > > > > >>>> it >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> is. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This approach might be an acceptable >> > > > > > > > >>>>> tradeoff >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> for >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> project; >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> having >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bootstrap look & feel is obviously a >> > > > > > > > >>>>> resource >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> savings >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> and >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right price point. But the site >> > > > > > > > >> mockup >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> definitely >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distinguish >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache NiFi "brand" in anyway. In >> fact >> > > > > > > > >>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> opposite, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> brand >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gets >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> watered >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down with this look. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As a funny side note, humorously for >> > > > > > > > >> me, >> > > > > > > > >>>>> this >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> was >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> first >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thought >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> head when I saw the site: >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/2010-04-01/ >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Adam >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 7:39 PM, >> Aldrin >> > > > > > > > >>>> Piri >> > > > > > > > >>>>> < >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In partial fulfillment of the goals >> > > > > > > > >> of >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> NIFI-162, I >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> set >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> some >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aside >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> put together something a bit more >> > > > > > > > >>>> visually >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> appealing >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> as a >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> face >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My work can be found at: >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apiri/apache-nifi-site >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Currently, work focused around the >> > > > > > > > >>>>> homepage, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> but >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> similar >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> styles >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> applied to more content driven pages >> > > > > > > > >>>> minus >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> large >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> headlining >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sections. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The relevant technology colophon is >> > > > > > > > >>>>> provided >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> in >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> README >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> on >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Github >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but is >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> primarily driven by Bootstrap, >> > > > > > > > >>> existing >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> image >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> resources >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> included >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project and current site, and other >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> "artwork" >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> which I >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> created >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> myself. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am neither a UX expert nor am I a >> > > > > > > > >>>>> renowned >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> front >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> end >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> designer, >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> input is welcome. As a "version >> > > > > > > > >> 1.1" >> > > > > > > > >>> I >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> would >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> like to >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> adjust >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> site >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> converge more with the application. >> > > > > > > > >>>> Ideas >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> for >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> this >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> are >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inclusive >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> points >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> such as bringing the toolbar styling >> > > > > > > > >>> and >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> color >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> scheme >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> from >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> application >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the site. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If this seems like a reasonable path >> > > > > > > > >>>>> forward >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> and >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> there >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> is >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sufficient >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> support, I can look at the next >> > > > > > > > >> steps >> > > > > > > > >>> to >> > > > > > > > >>>>> get >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> this >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> integrated >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project, optimization, and >> > > > > > > > >> integration >> > > > > > > > >>>>> with >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> application >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itself. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To aid in showing the intangibles >> > > > > > > > >> that >> > > > > > > > >>>>> can't >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> be >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> seen >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> from >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> an >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> image, I >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a copy of this design hosted at >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://aldrinpiri.com/apache-nifi/. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> links are currently nonfunctional as >> > > > > > > > >>>> they >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> were >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> taken >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> from >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> site. >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --Aldrin >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >>
