Mentors (excl. Paul) - can we please get some of your attention to vote on
this release?

Thank you!
--
Nikita Ivanov



On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 9:49 PM Paul King <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1
>
> Checked hashes and signatures.
> "maven clean verify" passes (fails on Windows JDK8 as per NLPCRAFT-76,
> passes on Linux JDK11)
> "maven apache-rat:rat" passes (but it is configured to ignore failures, you
> can change numUnapprovedLicenses in the pom from 1000000 to 0 and it still
> currently passes, this looks like a good idea)
> incubating in name
> DISCLAIMER exists
> NOTICE seems okay
> LICENSE seems okay
> no unexpected binary files
> licensing issues found by Justin last time seem sorted
>
> Cheers, Paul.
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 8:43 AM Aaron Radzinski <[email protected]
> >
> wrote:
>
> > NLPCraft-ers,
> > This is a call for a vote to release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) version
> > 0.6.2. As you may know, we've been working on refactoring the
> configuration
> > for several of our subsystems due to CC BY 4.0 licensing that caused us
> > trouble last time. We've worked with Apache Legal and run our solution by
> > Justin McLean so we are confident in our resolution.
> >
> > In short, NLPCraft 0.6.2 ships with the default configuration that is
> fully
> > ASL 2.0 licensed. Users have an option to manually download a separate
> > pre-packaged configuration that includes content based on CC BY 4.0
> > license, if they desire so and accept CC BY 4.0 license restrictions.
> >
> > Release information:
> > 1. Release location:
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nlpcraft/nlpcraft/0.6.2/
> > 3. Git tag: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nlpcraft/tree/v0.6.2
> > 4. JIRA issues fixed in release:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NLPCRAFT/versions/12347775
> > 5. KEYS file:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/nlpcraft/KEYS
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number
> of
> > votes are reached.
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> > Thank you,
> > --
> > Aaron Radzinski
> >
>

Reply via email to