Paul, Fixed 'numUnapprovedLicenses' in master: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nlpcraft/commit/5c800be2013f78a693a36a60b13358092e7e4732
Thanks, -- Aaron Radzinski On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 9:49 PM Paul King <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 > > Checked hashes and signatures. > "maven clean verify" passes (fails on Windows JDK8 as per NLPCRAFT-76, > passes on Linux JDK11) > "maven apache-rat:rat" passes (but it is configured to ignore failures, you > can change numUnapprovedLicenses in the pom from 1000000 to 0 and it still > currently passes, this looks like a good idea) > incubating in name > DISCLAIMER exists > NOTICE seems okay > LICENSE seems okay > no unexpected binary files > licensing issues found by Justin last time seem sorted > > Cheers, Paul. > > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 8:43 AM Aaron Radzinski <[email protected] > > wrote: > > > NLPCraft-ers, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) version > > 0.6.2. As you may know, we've been working on refactoring the configuration > > for several of our subsystems due to CC BY 4.0 licensing that caused us > > trouble last time. We've worked with Apache Legal and run our solution by > > Justin McLean so we are confident in our resolution. > > > > In short, NLPCraft 0.6.2 ships with the default configuration that is fully > > ASL 2.0 licensed. Users have an option to manually download a separate > > pre-packaged configuration that includes content based on CC BY 4.0 > > license, if they desire so and accept CC BY 4.0 license restrictions. > > > > Release information: > > 1. Release location: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nlpcraft/nlpcraft/0.6.2/ > > 3. Git tag: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nlpcraft/tree/v0.6.2 > > 4. JIRA issues fixed in release: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NLPCRAFT/versions/12347775 > > 5. KEYS file: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/nlpcraft/KEYS > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number of > > votes are reached. > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > Thank you, > > -- > > Aaron Radzinski > >
