> We only supply src distributions... > Does this principle apply to Nutch 2 as well? Maybe, yes. The situation with the current binary package is uncomfortable: I had to copy/link gora-hbase and hbase jars into lib/ to get nutch running.
2012/6/13 Lewis John Mcgibbney <lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> > Hi Guys, > > Whilst updating the Nutch2Tutorial I got thinking that within Gora we > don't supply binary distributions of the code, this is because when using > Gora a user may wish/require to recompile the code to accomodate config > changes etc. We only supply src distributions... > > Does this principle apply to Nutch 2 as well? I mean, what if your using > the gora-sql dependency, then you wish to switch to HBase and recompile, is > this possible within the binary distribution? > > Best > > Lewis > > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Julien Nioche < > lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Ferdy >> >>> >>> The Nutch job jar is not present in the binary archive. This means >>> distributed running of jobs is not supported. I'm not sure if this is a >>> problem (since users can always build one themselves), merely pointing it >>> out. The recently released 1.5 also lacks this job jar, so at least no >>> difference there. >>> >> >> The binary distrib corresponds to runtime/local and as such should NOT >> have the job file there. This is now the norm since 1.5 >> >> Will try and do some testing of the RC >> >> Thanks >> >> Julien >> >> >> >> -- >> * >> *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering >> >> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ >> http://www.digitalpebble.com >> http://twitter.com/digitalpebble >> >> > > > -- > *Lewis* > >
